BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to evaluate, to prove their reliability, the different surgical landmarks previously proposed as a mean to locate the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN). METHODS: The necks of 143 (68 male and 76 female) human adult embalmed cadavers were examined. RLN origin and length and its relationship to different landmarks were recorded and results compared with those previously reported. Statistical comparisons were performed using the chi-square test (significance, p ≤ .05). RESULTS: Mostly, RLN is located anterior to the tracheoesophageal sulcus (41.6%), posterior to the inferior thyroid artery (35.8%), lateral to Berry's ligament (88.1%), below the inferior rim of the inferior constrictor muscle (90.4%), and entering the larynx before its terminal division (54.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The position of the RLN in relation to those structures classically considered as landmarks is highly variable. The most reliable relationships are those with Berry's ligament or the inferior constrictor muscle.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to evaluate, to prove their reliability, the different surgical landmarks previously proposed as a mean to locate the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN). METHODS: The necks of 143 (68 male and 76 female) human adult embalmed cadavers were examined. RLN origin and length and its relationship to different landmarks were recorded and results compared with those previously reported. Statistical comparisons were performed using the chi-square test (significance, p ≤ .05). RESULTS: Mostly, RLN is located anterior to the tracheoesophageal sulcus (41.6%), posterior to the inferior thyroid artery (35.8%), lateral to Berry's ligament (88.1%), below the inferior rim of the inferior constrictor muscle (90.4%), and entering the larynx before its terminal division (54.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The position of the RLN in relation to those structures classically considered as landmarks is highly variable. The most reliable relationships are those with Berry's ligament or the inferior constrictor muscle.
Authors: J M Prades; M D Dubois; J M Dumollard; L Tordella; J Rigail; A P Timoshenko; M Peoc'h Journal: Surg Radiol Anat Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 1.246
Authors: Brandon Michael Henry; Silvia Sanna; Matthew J Graves; Jens Vikse; Beatrice Sanna; Iwona M Tomaszewska; R Shane Tubbs; Jerzy A Walocha; Krzysztof A Tomaszewski Journal: PeerJ Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Beata Wojtczak; Krzysztof Kaliszewski; Krzysztof Sutkowski; Marek Bolanowski; Marcin Barczyński Journal: Endocrine Date: 2017-11-08 Impact factor: 3.633