Literature DB >> 22075328

The importance of physicians' risk perception in osteoporosis treatment decision making.

Joan M Neuner1, Marilyn M Schapira.   

Abstract

Recent physicians' guidelines for postmenopausal osteoporosis emphasize the use of fracture-risk scores. To determine whether adherence to the guidelines has potential to improve targeting of care, we examined survey results from a random sample of US primary care physicians prior to the new guidelines. Survey measures included physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers to care. Physicians' estimates of 5-yr and lifetime absolute hip fracture risks and their treatment decisions were examined for patient vignettes depicting postmenopausal women of varying ages, weights, and bone mineral density (BMD) results. The 360 US physician respondents were accurate in their estimates of lifetime fracture risk for all 4 vignettes, but overestimated 5-yr hip fracture risk by a factor of 10 or more; 36-45% of the physicians recommended treatment for patients whose history and BMD placed them below guideline-recommended treatment thresholds, and 5-yr risk estimates were strongly associated with prescription treatment decisions for 2 of 3 such vignettes (both p<0.01). Other potential barriers to care include medication costs and adverse effects. Our findings suggest efforts to improve targeting of osteoporosis care are appropriately addressing physicians' risk estimation. Evidence from other conditions suggests these efforts must be intensive and available at the point of care.
Copyright © 2012 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22075328     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  7 in total

1.  Patient perceptions of osteoporosis treatment thresholds.

Authors:  Joan M Neuner; Marilyn M Schapira
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.666

2.  A Prospective Evaluation of the Awareness, Knowledge, and Management of Osteoporosis in a Cohort of Medical Staff.

Authors:  Xiaoling Zhou; Xin Li; Tingting Wei; Ying Xu; Yuanyuan Mao; Chen Lei
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 2.809

3.  Medical specialty-related adherence to anti-osteoporotic regimens in fragility hip fracture patients.

Authors:  Chung-Yuan Hsu; Wen-Chan Chiu; Jia-Feng Chen; Ching-Lan Chou; Yu-Jih Su; Shan-Fu Yu; Tien-Tsai Cheng
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  At Odds About the Odds: Women's Choices to Accept Osteoporosis Medications Do Not Closely Agree with Physician-Set Treatment Thresholds.

Authors:  Emma O Billington; A Lynn Feasel; Gregory A Kline
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Managing Osteoporosis: A Survey of Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices among Primary Care Physicians in Israel.

Authors:  Yacov Fogelman; Inbal Goldshtein; Elena Segal; Sofia Ish-Shalom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Management of Fracture Risk in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Building a UK Consensus Through Healthcare Professional and Patient Engagement.

Authors:  Ayushman Gupta; Leah R Jayes; Steve Holmes; Opinder Sahota; Melissa Canavan; Sarah L Elkin; Kelvin Lim; Anna C Murphy; Sally Singh; Elizabeth A Towlson; Helen Ward; Jane Scullion; Tricia M McKeever; Charlotte E Bolton
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2020-06-15

7.  Treatment thresholds and minimal clinically important effect sizes of antiosteoporotic medication-Survey among physicians and lay persons in Germany.

Authors:  Piet van der Keylen; Nikoletta Zeschick; Anna Ruth Schlenz; Thomas Kühlein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.