BACKGROUND: Supporting the family-as-a-whole presents challenges in palliative care, although family meetings are increasingly used in routine practice. The Family Focused Grief Therapy (FFGT) Model guides clinicians in using a range of intervention strategies. AIM: To examine the therapists' techniques used in assessing 'at risk' families in palliative care to better illuminate what helps and what remains challenging. METHOD: Recorded sessions 1 and 2 were coded using the FFGT fidelity coding measure, with its glossary of definitions. Inter-rater reliability between three coders was satisfactory at 88%. Frequencies of strategy utilization were computed, with extraction of examples of both successful and problematic approaches. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: From within a larger study of family therapy during palliative care at a comprehensive cancer center, the first two sessions (n = 144) delivered to 74 families (299 individuals) by 32 therapists were coded and analyzed. RESULTS: Therapists readily explored the story of illness and families' ways of coping (97%) and assessed communication and cohesiveness in the majority. Exploration of relational patterns occurred in 89% of sessions, use of a genogram in 80%, understanding members' roles in 65% and family values and beliefs in 62%. Less use was made of summaries (39%), family mottos (34%), exploration of family conflict (35%) and the formalization of a comprehensive family treatment plan (20%). CONCLUSIONS: Challenges exist in therapy with difficult families. Therapy in the home brings special issues. Therapists can apply most of the interventions prescribed by the FFGT model.
BACKGROUND: Supporting the family-as-a-whole presents challenges in palliative care, although family meetings are increasingly used in routine practice. The Family Focused Grief Therapy (FFGT) Model guides clinicians in using a range of intervention strategies. AIM: To examine the therapists' techniques used in assessing 'at risk' families in palliative care to better illuminate what helps and what remains challenging. METHOD: Recorded sessions 1 and 2 were coded using the FFGT fidelity coding measure, with its glossary of definitions. Inter-rater reliability between three coders was satisfactory at 88%. Frequencies of strategy utilization were computed, with extraction of examples of both successful and problematic approaches. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: From within a larger study of family therapy during palliative care at a comprehensive cancer center, the first two sessions (n = 144) delivered to 74 families (299 individuals) by 32 therapists were coded and analyzed. RESULTS: Therapists readily explored the story of illness and families' ways of coping (97%) and assessed communication and cohesiveness in the majority. Exploration of relational patterns occurred in 89% of sessions, use of a genogram in 80%, understanding members' roles in 65% and family values and beliefs in 62%. Less use was made of summaries (39%), family mottos (34%), exploration of family conflict (35%) and the formalization of a comprehensive family treatment plan (20%). CONCLUSIONS: Challenges exist in therapy with difficult families. Therapy in the home brings special issues. Therapists can apply most of the interventions prescribed by the FFGT model.
Authors: Eunice K H Chan; Imogen O'Neill; Maria McKenzie; Anthony Love; David W Kissane Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 3.612