Literature DB >> 22075122

Effects of structural properties of electrospun TiO2 nanofiber meshes on their osteogenic potential.

Xiaokun Wang1, Rolando A Gittens, Rosemary Song, Rina Tannenbaum, Rene Olivares-Navarrete, Zvi Schwartz, Haifeng Chen, Barbara D Boyan.   

Abstract

Ideal outcomes in the field of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine involve biomaterials that can enhance cell differentiation and production of local factors for natural tissue regeneration without the use of systemic drugs. Biomaterials typically used in tissue engineering applications include polymeric scaffolds that mimic the three-dimensional structural environment of the native tissue, but these are often functionalized with proteins or small peptides to improve their biological performance. For bone applications, titanium implants, or more appropriately the TiO2 passive oxide layer formed on their surface, have been shown to enhance osteoblast differentiation in vitro and to promote osseointegration in vivo. In this study we evaluated the effect on osteoblast differentiation of pure TiO2 nanofiber meshes with different surface microroughness and nanofiber diameters, prepared by the electrospinning method. MG63 cells were seeded on TiO2 meshes, and cell number, differentiation markers and local factor production were analyzed. The results showed that cells grew throughout the entire surfaces and with similar morphology in all groups. Cell number was sensitive to surface microroughness, whereas cell differentiation and local factor production was regulated by both surface roughness and nanofiber diameter. These results indicate that scaffold structural cues alone can be used to drive cell differentiation and create an osteogenic environment without the use of exogenous factors.
Copyright © 2011 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22075122      PMCID: PMC3309709          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  51 in total

1.  Cells react to nanoscale order and symmetry in their surroundings.

Authors:  A S G Curtis; N Gadegaard; M J Dalby; M O Riehle; C D W Wilkinson; G Aitchison
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nanobioscience       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.935

2.  The interaction of osteoblasts with bone-implant materials: 1. The effect of physicochemical surface properties of implant materials.

Authors:  D Kubies; L Himmlová; T Riedel; E Chánová; K Balík; M Douděrová; J Bártová; V Pešáková
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 1.881

3.  Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces.

Authors:  F Rupp; L Scheideler; N Olshanska; M de Wild; M Wieland; J Geis-Gerstorfer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 4.  Electrospinning: applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering.

Authors:  Travis J Sill; Horst A von Recum
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Modified titanium surfaces promote accelerated osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells in vitro.

Authors:  Ivan Wall; Nikos Donos; Karin Carlqvist; Francis Jones; Peter Brett
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  1 alpha, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 specific regulation of growth, morphology, and fibronectin in a human osteosarcoma cell line.

Authors:  R T Franceschi; W M James; G Zerlauth
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 6.384

7.  Cell infiltration and growth in a low density, uncompressed three-dimensional electrospun nanofibrous scaffold.

Authors:  Bryan A Blakeney; Ajay Tambralli; Joel M Anderson; Adinarayana Andukuri; Dong-Jin Lim; Derrick R Dean; Ho-Wook Jun
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Mechanical properties and in vivo behavior of a biodegradable synthetic polymer microfiber-extracellular matrix hydrogel biohybrid scaffold.

Authors:  Yi Hong; Alexander Huber; Keisuke Takanari; Nicholas J Amoroso; Ryotaro Hashizume; Stephen F Badylak; William R Wagner
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Optimization strategies for electrospun silk fibroin tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Anne J Meinel; Kristopher E Kubow; Enrico Klotzsch; Marcos Garcia-Fuentes; Michael L Smith; Viola Vogel; Hans P Merkle; Lorenz Meinel
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  3-D Nanofibrous electrospun multilayered construct is an alternative ECM mimicking scaffold.

Authors:  S Srouji; T Kizhner; E Suss-Tobi; E Livne; E Zussman
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.896

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Implant Surface Design Regulates Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation and Maturation.

Authors:  B D Boyan; A Cheng; R Olivares-Navarrete; Z Schwartz
Journal:  Adv Dent Res       Date:  2016-03

2.  Role of Region-Specific Brain Decellularized Extracellular Matrix on In Vitro Neuronal Maturation.

Authors:  Diego Reginensi; Didio Ortiz; Andrea Pravia; Andrea Burillo; Félix Morales; Carly Morgan; Lindsay Jimenez; Kunjan R Dave; Miguel A Perez-Pinzon; Rolando A Gittens
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Role of integrin α2 β1 in mediating osteoblastic differentiation on three-dimensional titanium scaffolds with submicron-scale texture.

Authors:  Xiaokun Wang; Zvi Schwartz; Rolando A Gittens; Alice Cheng; Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Haifeng Chen; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Enantiomeric helical TiO2 nanofibers modulate different peptide assemblies and subsequent cellular behaviors.

Authors:  Xu Jie; Deng Xu; Weili Wei
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 4.036

5.  Novel Osteogenic Ti-6Al-4V Device For Restoration Of Dental Function In Patients With Large Bone Deficiencies: Design, Development And Implementation.

Authors:  D J Cohen; A Cheng; A Kahn; M Aviram; A J Whitehead; S L Hyzy; R M Clohessy; B D Boyan; Z Schwartz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Shape and surface properties of titanate nanomaterials influence differential cellular uptake behavior and biological responses in THP-1 cells.

Authors:  Suwimon Boonrungsiman; Wongsakorn Suchaoin; Paninee Chetprayoon; Nawin Viriya-Empikul; Sasitorn Aueviriyavit; Rawiwan Maniratanachote
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2017-01-05

Review 7.  How Can Nanotechnology Help to Repair the Body? Advances in Cardiac, Skin, Bone, Cartilage and Nerve Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Macarena Perán; María Angel García; Elena Lopez-Ruiz; Gema Jiménez; Juan Antonio Marchal
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Proliferation of osteoblast precursor cells on the surface of TiO2 nanowires anodically grown on a β-type biomedical titanium alloy.

Authors:  Leonardo Fanton; Frida Loria; Mario Amores; M Ruth Pazos; Cristina Adán; Rafael A García-Muñoz; Javier Marugán
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Size-controlled conformal nanofabrication of biotemplated three-dimensional TiO₂ and ZnO nanonetworks.

Authors:  Hakan Ceylan; Cagla Ozgit-Akgun; Turan S Erkal; Inci Donmez; Ruslan Garifullin; Ayse B Tekinay; Hakan Usta; Necmi Biyikli; Mustafa O Guler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The synergistic effect of TiO2 nanoporous modification and platelet-rich plasma treatment on titanium-implant stability in ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  Nan Jiang; Pinggong Du; Weidong Qu; Lin Li; Zhonghao Liu; Songsong Zhu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2016-09-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.