OBJECTIVE: Factors contributing to postoperative complications include blood loss and a heightened inflammatory response. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that aprotinin would decrease perioperative blood product use, reduce biomarkers of inflammation, and result in improved clinical outcome parameters in neonates undergoing cardiac operations. METHODS: This was a secondary retrospective analysis of a clinical trial whereby neonates undergoing cardiac surgery received either aprotinin (n = 34; before May 2008) or tranexamic acid (n = 42; after May 2008). Perioperative blood product use, clinical course, and measurements of cytokines were compared. RESULTS: Use of perioperative red blood cells, cryoprecipitate, and platelets was reduced in neonates receiving aprotinin compared with tranexamic acid (P < .05). Recombinant activated factor VII use (2/34 [6%] vs 18/42 [43%]; P < .001), delayed sternal closure (12/34 [35%] vs 26/42 [62%]; P = .02), and inotropic requirements at 24 and 36 hours (P < .05) were also reduced in the aprotinin group. Median duration of mechanical ventilation was reduced compared with tranexamic acid: 2.9 days (interquartile range: 1.7-5.1 days) versus 4.2 days (2.9-5.2 days), P = .04. Production of tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-2 activation were attenuated in the aprotinin group at 24 hours postoperatively. No differential effects on renal function were seen between agents. CONCLUSIONS: Aprotinin, compared with tranexamic acid, was associated with reduced perioperative blood product use, improved early indices of postoperative recovery, and attenuated indices of cytokine activation, without early adverse effects. These findings suggest that aprotinin may have unique effects in the context of neonatal cardiac surgery and challenge contentions that antifibrinolytics are equivalent with respect to early postoperative outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: Factors contributing to postoperative complications include blood loss and a heightened inflammatory response. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that aprotinin would decrease perioperative blood product use, reduce biomarkers of inflammation, and result in improved clinical outcome parameters in neonates undergoing cardiac operations. METHODS: This was a secondary retrospective analysis of a clinical trial whereby neonates undergoing cardiac surgery received either aprotinin (n = 34; before May 2008) or tranexamic acid (n = 42; after May 2008). Perioperative blood product use, clinical course, and measurements of cytokines were compared. RESULTS: Use of perioperative red blood cells, cryoprecipitate, and platelets was reduced in neonates receiving aprotinin compared with tranexamic acid (P < .05). Recombinant activated factor VII use (2/34 [6%] vs 18/42 [43%]; P < .001), delayed sternal closure (12/34 [35%] vs 26/42 [62%]; P = .02), and inotropic requirements at 24 and 36 hours (P < .05) were also reduced in the aprotinin group. Median duration of mechanical ventilation was reduced compared with tranexamic acid: 2.9 days (interquartile range: 1.7-5.1 days) versus 4.2 days (2.9-5.2 days), P = .04. Production of tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-2 activation were attenuated in the aprotinin group at 24 hours postoperatively. No differential effects on renal function were seen between agents. CONCLUSIONS: Aprotinin, compared with tranexamic acid, was associated with reduced perioperative blood product use, improved early indices of postoperative recovery, and attenuated indices of cytokine activation, without early adverse effects. These findings suggest that aprotinin may have unique effects in the context of neonatal cardiac surgery and challenge contentions that antifibrinolytics are equivalent with respect to early postoperative outcomes.
Authors: Carl L Backer; Angela M Kelle; Robert D Stewart; Sunitha C Suresh; Farah N Ali; Richard A Cohn; Roopa Seshadri; Constantine Mavroudis Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2007-10-22 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Tamás Breuer; Klaus Martin; Markus Wilhelm; Gunther Wiesner; Christian Schreiber; John Hess; Rüdiger Lange; Peter Tassani Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2008-11-21 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Dean A Fergusson; Paul C Hébert; C David Mazer; Stephen Fremes; Charles MacAdams; John M Murkin; Kevin Teoh; Peter C Duke; Ramiro Arellano; Morris A Blajchman; Jean S Bussières; Dany Côté; Jacek Karski; Raymond Martineau; James A Robblee; Marc Rodger; George Wells; Jennifer Clinch; Roanda Pretorius Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-05-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Timothy M Hoffman; Gil Wernovsky; Andrew M Atz; Thomas J Kulik; David P Nelson; Anthony C Chang; James M Bailey; Akbar Akbary; John F Kocsis; Raymond Kaczmarek; Thomas L Spray; David L Wessel Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-02-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Nina A Guzzetta; Faye M Evans; Eli S Rosenberg; Tom M Fazlollah; Michael J Baker; Elizabeth C Wilson; Anna M Kaiser; Steven R Tosone; Bruce E Miller Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Ravindra L Mehta; John A Kellum; Sudhir V Shah; Bruce A Molitoris; Claudio Ronco; David G Warnock; Adeera Levin Journal: Crit Care Date: 2007 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Eric M Graham; Andrew M Atz; Kimberly E McHugh; Ryan J Butts; Nathaniel L Baker; Robert E Stroud; Scott T Reeves; Scott M Bradley; Francis X McGowan; Francis G Spinale Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2013-07-16 Impact factor: 5.209