| Literature DB >> 22073175 |
Ruben Hummelen1, Jean M Macklaim, Jordan E Bisanz, Jo-Anne Hammond, Amy McMillan, Rebecca Vongsa, David Koenig, Gregory B Gloor, Gregor Reid.
Abstract
After menopause, many women experience vaginal dryness and atrophy of tissue, often attributed to the loss of estrogen. An understudied aspect of vaginal health in women who experience dryness due to atrophy is the role of the resident microbes. It is known that the microbiota has an important role in healthy vaginal homeostasis, including maintaining the pH balance and excluding pathogens. The objectives of this study were twofold: first to identify the microbiome of post-menopausal women with and without vaginal dryness and symptoms of atrophy; and secondly to examine any differences in epithelial gene expression associated with atrophy. The vaginal microbiome of 32 post-menopausal women was profiled using Illumina sequencing of the V6 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Sixteen subjects were selected for follow-up sampling every two weeks for 10 weeks. In addition, 10 epithelial RNA samples (6 healthy and 4 experiencing vaginal dryness) were acquired for gene expression analysis by Affymetrix Human Gene array. The microbiota abundance profiles were relatively stable over 10 weeks compared to previously published data on premenopausal women. There was an inverse correlation between Lactobacillus ratio and dryness and an increased bacterial diversity in women experiencing moderate to severe vaginal dryness. In healthy participants, Lactobacillus iners and L. crispatus were generally the most abundant, countering the long-held view that lactobacilli are absent or depleted in menopause. Vaginal dryness and atrophy were associated with down-regulation of human genes involved in maintenance of epithelial structure and barrier function, while those associated with inflammation were up-regulated consistent with the adverse clinical presentation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22073175 PMCID: PMC3206802 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026602
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Microbiota profiles for 32 post-menopausal women clustered by biota similarity.
Each bar represents a single vaginal sample, and the colored segments represent the relative fraction of each bacterial taxon detected at 1% relative abundance or greater in any one sample. Sequences at less than 1% abundance have been included in the “remainder” fraction at the top of the bar (see color legend of bacterial taxa). The microbiota are clustered by similarity as represented in the dendogram above. The sample name (participant ID-time point) is labeled in the dendogram and corresponds to the bar below. The dryness score as observed by the examining nurse is represented below each microbiota bar.
Figure 2Time-series microbiota profiles for 16 post-menopausal sampled every 2 weeks.
Each bar represents a single vaginal sample, and each cluster of bars is a single participant (starting at time 0 and sampled every 2 weeks for up to 10 weeks total). The colored segments represent the relative fraction of each bacterial taxon detected at 1% relative abundance or greater. Sequences at less than 1% abundance have been included in the “remainder” fraction at the top of the bar (see color legend of bacterial taxa). The dryness score as observed by the examining nurse is represented below each microbiota bar. Sample time points that were included in the microarray analysis are marked with an arrowhead: the first six green arrows are controls (no or mild dryness), and the last four red arrows are women experiencing moderate to severe dryness.
Figure 3Heatmap of vaginal epithelial gene expression of 10 samples.
A clustered heatmap of differential gene expression (>2-fold change, p<0.05) between the control and dryness groups. Samples are labeled as participant number-time point (week). Samples assigned to the dryness or control groups based on physiological examination of the vagina are well separated by gene expression differences with exception of 4–8 which has an intermediate gene expression profile and clusters closer to the dryness group.
The top 20 genes up- and down- regulated genes (p<0.05) in the vaginal dryness group compared to controls.
| Gene Symbol | Gene Assignment | RefSeq ID |
| Fold Change |
| MMP7 | matrix metallopeptidase 7 (matrilysin, uterine) | NM_002423 | 7.73E-03 | 13.75 |
| SLC44A4 | solute carrier family 44, member 4 | NM_025257 | 2.23E-02 | 9.19 |
| SLC44A4 | solute carrier family 44, member 4 | NM_025257 | 2.23E-02 | 9.19 |
| SLC44A4 | solute carrier family 44, member 4 | NM_025257 | 2.23E-02 | 9.19 |
| CFH | complement factor H | NM_000186 | 4.79E-03 | 8.72 |
| PIGR | polymeric immunoglobulin receptor | NM_002644 | 2.01E-02 | 8.64 |
| IL19 | interleukin 19 | NM_153758 | 3.25E-02 | 8.31 |
| Transcript ID: 8158684 | 9.50E-03 | 8.28 | ||
| Transcript ID: 8180303 | 2.26E-02 | 7.73 | ||
| CFB | complement factor B | NM_001710 | 4.69E-02 | 7.33 |
| PLAT | plasminogen activator, tissue | NM_000930 | 2.23E-02 | 7.19 |
| Transcript ID: 8138487 | 2.08E-03 | 7.10 | ||
| CFB | complement factor B | NM_001710 | 4.78E-02 | 6.93 |
| WFDC2 | WAP four-disulfide core domain 2 | NM_006103 | 8.32E-03 | 6.61 |
| CXCL6 | chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 6 | NM_002993 | 1.81E-02 | 6.50 |
| TSPAN1 | tetraspanin 1 | NM_005727 | 2.46E-02 | 6.30 |
| AGR2 | anterior gradient homolog 2 (Xenopus laevis) | NM_006408 | 1.50E-02 | 6.18 |
| TRIM31 | tripartite motif-containing 31 | NM_007028 | 4.77E-02 | 5.85 |
| ASS1 | argininosuccinate synthetase 1 | NM_000050 | 3.05E-03 | 5.70 |
| PLAC8 | placenta-specific 8 | NM_016619 | 2.03E-02 | 5.51 |
| SPINK7 | serine peptidase inhibitor, Kazal type 7 (putative) | NM_032566 | 4.81E-04 | −38.65 |
| TGM3 | transglutaminase 3 | NM_003245 | 4.24E-05 | −21.86 |
| SBSN | Suprabasin, part of a gene complex including dermokine | NM_198538 | 3.28E-05 | −20.93 |
| ALOX12 | arachidonate 12-lipoxygenase | NM_000697 | 4.43E-04 | −19.61 |
| KPRP | keratinocyte proline-rich protein | NM_001025231 | 2.30E-04 | −17.43 |
| GYS2 | glycogen synthase 2 (liver) | NM_021957 | 1.66E-03 | −16.78 |
| DSG1 | desmoglein 1 | NM_001942 | 5.02E-03 | −16.61 |
| LCE3E | late cornified envelope 3E | NM_178435 | 6.78E-04 | −15.35 |
| LCE3D | late cornified envelope 3D | NM_032563 | 3.27E-03 | −14.61 |
| SERPINB12 | serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B | NM_080474 | 1.42E-03 | −14.11 |
| PNLIPRP3 | pancreatic lipase-related protein 3 | NM_001011709 | 3.06E-04 | −13.69 |
| KRTDAP | keratinocyte differentiation-associated protein | NM_207392 | 2.16E-03 | −13.08 |
| CLDN17 | claudin 17 | NM_012131 | 1.99E-03 | −12.88 |
| KRT1 | keratin 1 | NM_006121 | 1.16E-03 | −11.99 |
| LOC441178 | hypothetical LOC441178 | AL832737 | 4.66E-03 | −10.89 |
| LOC441178 | hypothetical LOC441178 | AL832737 | 4.66E-03 | −10.89 |
| ME1 | malic enzyme 1, NADP(+)-dependent, cytosolic | NM_002395 | 1.32E-03 | −10.57 |
| Transcript ID: 8020347 | 1.70E-03 | −10.26 | ||
| CRCT1 | cysteine-rich C-terminal 1 | NM_019060 | 3.86E-03 | −9.80 |
| CRISP3 | cysteine-rich secretory protein 3 | NM_006061 | 8.76E-03 | −9.75 |
Enrichment of GO terms in the filtered gene list (n = 960).
| Function | GO ID | Enrichment Score | Enrichment | No. of Genes | % of total genes in GO term group differentially expressed |
| Cornified envelope | 1533 | 21.81 | 3.37E-10 | 10 | 62.50 |
| Keratinocyte differentiation | 30216 | 20.01 | 2.04E-09 | 11 | 47.83 |
| Immune response | 6955 | 19.20 | 4.60E-09 | 38 | 13.52 |
| Cell differentiation | 30154 | 17.96 | 1.59E-08 | 24 | 17.91 |
| Epidermis development | 8544 | 17.55 | 2.38E-08 | 17 | 23.94 |
| Tissue development | 9888 | 17.48 | 2.55E-08 | 23 | 18.11 |
| Cellular developmental process | 48869 | 15.29 | 2.28E-07 | 30 | 13.45 |
| Extracellular region | 5576 | 13.99 | 8.37E-07 | 37 | 11.28 |
| Epithelial cell differentiation | 30855 | 13.12 | 2.01E-06 | 6 | 60.00 |
| Innate immune response | 45087 | 13.03 | 2.18E-06 | 11 | 26.83 |