| Literature DB >> 22072893 |
Uchechukwu U Nwodo1, Grace E Obiiyeke, Vincent N Chigor, Anthony I Okoh.
Abstract
Ethanolic and aqueous (hot and cold) extracts of the fruit pulp, stem bark and leaves of Tamarindus indica were evaluated for antibacterial activity, in vitro, against 13 Gram negative and 5 Gram positive bacterial strains using agar well diffusion and macro broth dilution techniques, simultaneously. The fruit pulp extracts exhibited a wide spectrum of activity; the cold water extract against 95.5% of the test bacterial strains; and the hot water and ethanolic extracts against 90.9% and 86.4%, respectively. In contrast the cold water extract of the leaves and stem bark, each was active against 16.7%; while the ethanolic extract of each was active against 75% of the test strains. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) ranged from 7.81 mg/mL against Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6051 to 31.25 mg/mL against Escherichia coli ATCC 11775; and the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) ranged from 125 mg/mL against Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 10145 to 250 mg/mL against Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6051.Entities:
Keywords: Tamarind; Tamarindus indica; antibacterial activity; extracts
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22072893 PMCID: PMC3210984 DOI: 10.3390/ijms12106385
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
The yield and pH of the various crude extracts of Tamarindus indica.
| Extract | Yield (%) | pH |
|---|---|---|
| Leaves (L) | ||
| Cold Water (LCW) | 5.76 (11.5) | 5.45 |
| Hot Water (LHW) | 5.21 (10.4) | 4.99 |
| Ethanol (LET) | 4.38 (8.8) | 4.71 |
| Stem bark (S) | ||
| Cold water (SCW) | 4.85 (9.7) | 4.81 |
| Hot water (SHW) | 4.65 (9.3) | 4.70 |
| Ethanol (SET) | 4.58 (9.2) | 4.62 |
| Fruit pulp (F) | ||
| Cold water (FCW) | 7.21 (14.4) | 2.00 |
| Hot Water (FHW) | 6.54 (13.1) | 2.91 |
| Ethanol (FET) | 4.82 (9.6) | 3.18 |
Phyto-chemical Constituents of Extracts of Tamarindus indica.
| Constituents tested | Presence of constituent in plant Extract | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaves | Stem bark | Fruit pulp | |||||||
| LCW | LHW | LET | SCW | SHW | SET | FCW | FHW | FET | |
| Carbohydrate | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | +++ | + |
| Reducing sugar | ++ | + | + | ++ | + | + | + | ++ | + |
| Tannins | + | + | ++ | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Flavonoids | ND | ND | + | + | + | +++ | ++ | + | +++ |
| Anthroquinone | ND | ND | + | ND | ND | ++ | + | ND | ++ |
| Saponins | + | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
| Alkaloids | ND | ND | + | ND | ND | +++ | ++ | +++ | +++ |
| Cyanogenic glycosides | ND | ND | + | + | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| Terpenes | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | + |
| Sterols | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
Present in high mount (+++); present in moderate amount (++); present in low amount (+); not detected (ND); LCW = leaves cold water extract, LHW = leaves hot water extract, LET = leaves ethanol extract; SCW = stem cold water extract, SHW = stem hot water extract, SET = stem ethanol extract; FCW = fruit pulp cold water extract, FHW = fruit pulp hot water extract, FET = fruit pulp ethanol extract.
Antibacterial activity of the various parts of Tamarindus indica against test bacterial isolates.
| Bacterial Strain | Mean Inhibition Zone Diameter (250 mg/mL) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaves | Stem bark | Fruit pulp | Control | |||||||
| LCW | LHW | LET | SCW | SHW | SET | FCW | FHW | FET | Ciproflox | |
| 10.50 ± 0.25 | 0.00 | 8.0 ± 0.25 | 8.0 ± 0.0 | 13.0 ± 0.0 | 20.0 ± 1.41 | 20.0 ± 0.0 | 23.0 ± 0.0 | 18.0 ± 0.0 | 24.0 ± 0.45 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 10.0 ± 0.75 | 7.0 ± 0.0 | 7.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 20.0 ± 0.0 | 19.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 31.85 ± 0.25 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 20.5 ± 0.71 | 20.0 ± 0.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 19.0 ± 0.25 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 19.0 ± 0.0 | 19.0 ± 0.0 | 21.0 ± 0.0 | 24.8 ± 0.50 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 8.50 ± 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 19.5± 0.71 | 24.5 ± 0.71 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 23.0 ± 0.0 | 25.85 ± 0.25 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 18.0 ± 0.0 | 19.0 ± 0.0 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 23.25 ± 0.25 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 11.50 ± 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 23.0 ± 0.0 | 21.5 ± 0.71 | 17.0 ± 0.0 | 21.5 ± 0.71 | 23.25 ± 0.50 | |
| 9.5 ± 0.25 | 0.00 | 11.50 ± 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 19.0 ± 0.0 | 21.5 ± 0.71 | 21.0 ± 0.0 | 23.0 ± 0.41 | 26.0 ± 0.71 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 10.50 ± 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 16.0 ± 0.0 | 20.5 ± 0.71 | 24.0 ± 0.0 | 18.5 ± 4.95 | 31.0 ± 0.25 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 10.50 ± 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 16.0± 1.41 | 20.5 ± 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 22.5 ± 0.71 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 9.5 ± 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 18.0 ± 0.0 | 21.5 ± 0.71 | 17.0 ± 0.0 | 21.50 ± 0.71 | 24.25 ± 0.50 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 12.50 ± 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 10.5±0.71 | 18.5 ± 0.71 | 15.0 ± 0.0 | 20.50 ± 0.71 | 26.0 ± 0.71 | |
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration and MIC-minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) index on the test isolates.
| Bacterial Strain | SET | FCW | FHW | FET | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC | MBC | MBC-MIC INDEX | MIC | MBC | MBC-MIC INDEX | MIC | MBC | MBC-MIC INDEX | MIC | MBC | MBC-MIC INDEX | |
| 15.63 | 125 | 0.125 | 31.25 | 125 | 0.25 | 31.25 | 125 | 0.25 | 62.50 | 125 | 0.50 | |
| 31.25 | 125 | 0.25 | 31.25 | 125 | 0.25 | 62.50 | 125 | 0.50 | 125 | 125 | 1 | |
| 0 | ND | ND | 0 | ND | ND | 62.50 | 125 | 0.50 | 125 | 125 | 1 | |
| 0 | ND | ND | 31.25 | 0 | ND | 31.25 | 125 | 0.25 | 62.50 | 125 | 0.50 | |
| 15.63 | 125 | 0.125 | 31.25 | 125 | 0.25 | 125 | 125 | 1 | 62.50 | 125 | 0.50 | |
| 0 | ND | ND | 31.25 | 125 | 0.25 | 62.50 | 125 | 0.50 | 62.50 | 125 | 0.50 | |
| 15.63 | 250 | 0.125 | 7.81 | 250 | 0.0312 | 31.25 | 125 | 0.25 | 62.50 | 125 | 0.50 | |
| 7.81 | 125 | 0.063 | 31.25 | 125 | 0.25 | 31.25 | 125 | 0.25 | 62.50 | 125 | 0.50 | |
| 7.81 | 250 | 0.0312 | 62.50 | 250 | 0.25 | 31.25 | 125 | 0.25 | 62.50 | 125 | 0.50 | |
| 7.81 | 0 | ND | 62.50 | 0 | ND | 0 | 0 | ND | 0 | 0 | ND | |
| 15.63 | 125 | 0.125 | 62.50 | 125 | 0.50 | 62.50 | 125 | 0.50 | 62.50 | 250 | 0.25 | |
| 62.50 | 125 | 0.50 | 62.50 | 125 | 0.50 | 62.50 | 250 | 0.25 | 62.50 | 125 | 0.50 | |
ND = Not determined; 0 = absence of activity.
Effects of Tamarindus indica crude extracts On E. coli isolates from infantile diarrhea, Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates and its multi-drug resistant strain (Pseudomonas aeruginosa MDR).
| Bacterial Strain | Mean Inhibition Zone Diameter (250 mg/mL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stem bark | Fruit pulp | Control | |||
| SET | FCW | FHW | FET | Ciproflox (20 μg/mL) | |
| 20.0 ± 0.0 | 21.0 ± 0.0 | 19.0 ± 0.0 | 20.50 ± 0.71 | 23.25 ± 0.25 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 11.0 ± 0.50 | |
| 10.50 ± 0.0 | 25.0 ± 0.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 24.50 ± 0.71 | 13.50 ± 0.50 | |
| 13.50 ± 0.71 | 23.0 ± 0.0 | 22.0 ± 0.0 | 0.00 | 23.85 ± 0.45 | |
| 17.50 ± 0.71 | 26.0 ± 0.0 | 23.0 ± 0.0 | 27.0 ± 0.0 | 25.85 ± 0.25 | |
| 21.50 ± 0.71 | 17.0 ± 0.0 | 19.50 ± 0.71 | 18.0 ± 0.0 | 28.0 ± 0.40 | |
| 16.50 ± 0.71 | 28.0 ± 0.0 | 19.50 ± 0.71 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 19.50 ± 0.0 | |
| 20.50 ± 0.71 | 24.0 ± 0.0 | 20.0 ± 0.0 | 18.0 ± 1.41 | 24.85 ± 0.71 | |
| 17.50 ± 0.71 | 19.0 ± 0.0 | 19.0 ± 0.0 | 26.0 ± 0.0 | 26.0 ± 0.45 | |
| 19.0 ± 0.0 | 21.0 ± 0.71 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 19.0 ± 0.0 | 17.50 ± 0.60 | |
Figure 1Concentration dependent assay of T. indica fruit pulp on Ps. aeruginosa ATCC 10145.
Figure 2Concentration dependent assay of T. indica fruit pulp on Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6051.