MOTIVATION: Accurate knowledge of the genome-wide binding of transcription factors in a particular cell type or under a particular condition is necessary for understanding transcriptional regulation. Using epigenetic data such as histone modification and DNase I, accessibility data has been shown to improve motif-based in silico methods for predicting such binding, but this approach has not yet been fully explored. RESULTS: We describe a probabilistic method for combining one or more tracks of epigenetic data with a standard DNA sequence motif model to improve our ability to identify active transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs). We convert each data type into a position-specific probabilistic prior and combine these priors with a traditional probabilistic motif model to compute a log-posterior odds score. Our experiments, using histone modifications H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K9ac and H3K27ac, as well as DNase I sensitivity, show conclusively that the log-posterior odds score consistently outperforms a simple binary filter based on the same data. We also show that our approach performs competitively with a more complex method, CENTIPEDE, and suggest that the relative simplicity of the log-posterior odds scoring method makes it an appealing and very general method for identifying functional TFBSs on the basis of DNA and epigenetic evidence. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: FIMO, part of the MEME Suite software toolkit, now supports log-posterior odds scoring using position-specific priors for motif search. A web server and source code are available at http://meme.nbcr.net. Utilities for creating priors are at http://research.imb.uq.edu.au/t.bailey/SD/Cuellar2011. CONTACT: t.bailey@uq.edu.au SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
MOTIVATION: Accurate knowledge of the genome-wide binding of transcription factors in a particular cell type or under a particular condition is necessary for understanding transcriptional regulation. Using epigenetic data such as histone modification and DNase I, accessibility data has been shown to improve motif-based in silico methods for predicting such binding, but this approach has not yet been fully explored. RESULTS: We describe a probabilistic method for combining one or more tracks of epigenetic data with a standard DNA sequence motif model to improve our ability to identify active transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs). We convert each data type into a position-specific probabilistic prior and combine these priors with a traditional probabilistic motif model to compute a log-posterior odds score. Our experiments, using histone modifications H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K9ac and H3K27ac, as well as DNase I sensitivity, show conclusively that the log-posterior odds score consistently outperforms a simple binary filter based on the same data. We also show that our approach performs competitively with a more complex method, CENTIPEDE, and suggest that the relative simplicity of the log-posterior odds scoring method makes it an appealing and very general method for identifying functional TFBSs on the basis of DNA and epigenetic evidence. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: FIMO, part of the MEME Suite software toolkit, now supports log-posterior odds scoring using position-specific priors for motif search. A web server and source code are available at http://meme.nbcr.net. Utilities for creating priors are at http://research.imb.uq.edu.au/t.bailey/SD/Cuellar2011. CONTACT: t.bailey@uq.edu.au SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: Gregory E Crawford; Sean Davis; Peter C Scacheri; Gabriel Renaud; Mohamad J Halawi; Michael R Erdos; Roland Green; Paul S Meltzer; Tyra G Wolfsberg; Francis S Collins Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: John A Bernat; Gregory E Crawford; Aleksey Y Ogurtsov; Francis S Collins; David Ginsburg; Alexey S Kondrashov Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2006-05-24 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Nathaniel D Heintzman; Rhona K Stuart; Gary Hon; Yutao Fu; Christina W Ching; R David Hawkins; Leah O Barrera; Sara Van Calcar; Chunxu Qu; Keith A Ching; Wei Wang; Zhiping Weng; Roland D Green; Gregory E Crawford; Bing Ren Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2007-02-04 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Gordon Robertson; Martin Hirst; Matthew Bainbridge; Misha Bilenky; Yongjun Zhao; Thomas Zeng; Ghia Euskirchen; Bridget Bernier; Richard Varhol; Allen Delaney; Nina Thiessen; Obi L Griffith; Ann He; Marco Marra; Michael Snyder; Steven Jones Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2007-06-11 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Tarjei S Mikkelsen; Manching Ku; David B Jaffe; Biju Issac; Erez Lieberman; Georgia Giannoukos; Pablo Alvarez; William Brockman; Tae-Kyung Kim; Richard P Koche; William Lee; Eric Mendenhall; Aisling O'Donovan; Aviva Presser; Carsten Russ; Xiaohui Xie; Alexander Meissner; Marius Wernig; Rudolf Jaenisch; Chad Nusbaum; Eric S Lander; Bradley E Bernstein Journal: Nature Date: 2007-07-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Tianlei Xu; Ben Li; Meng Zhao; Keith E Szulwach; R Craig Street; Li Lin; Bing Yao; Feiran Zhang; Peng Jin; Hao Wu; Zhaohui S Qin Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Jinyu Yang; Anjun Ma; Adam D Hoppe; Cankun Wang; Yang Li; Chi Zhang; Yan Wang; Bingqiang Liu; Qin Ma Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2019-09-05 Impact factor: 16.971