Literature DB >> 22072382

Epigenetic priors for identifying active transcription factor binding sites.

Gabriel Cuellar-Partida1, Fabian A Buske, Robert C McLeay, Tom Whitington, William Stafford Noble, Timothy L Bailey.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Accurate knowledge of the genome-wide binding of transcription factors in a particular cell type or under a particular condition is necessary for understanding transcriptional regulation. Using epigenetic data such as histone modification and DNase I, accessibility data has been shown to improve motif-based in silico methods for predicting such binding, but this approach has not yet been fully explored.
RESULTS: We describe a probabilistic method for combining one or more tracks of epigenetic data with a standard DNA sequence motif model to improve our ability to identify active transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs). We convert each data type into a position-specific probabilistic prior and combine these priors with a traditional probabilistic motif model to compute a log-posterior odds score. Our experiments, using histone modifications H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K9ac and H3K27ac, as well as DNase I sensitivity, show conclusively that the log-posterior odds score consistently outperforms a simple binary filter based on the same data. We also show that our approach performs competitively with a more complex method, CENTIPEDE, and suggest that the relative simplicity of the log-posterior odds scoring method makes it an appealing and very general method for identifying functional TFBSs on the basis of DNA and epigenetic evidence.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: FIMO, part of the MEME Suite software toolkit, now supports log-posterior odds scoring using position-specific priors for motif search. A web server and source code are available at http://meme.nbcr.net. Utilities for creating priors are at http://research.imb.uq.edu.au/t.bailey/SD/Cuellar2011. CONTACT: t.bailey@uq.edu.au SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22072382      PMCID: PMC3244768          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  28 in total

1.  CisModule: de novo discovery of cis-regulatory modules by hierarchical mixture modeling.

Authors:  Qing Zhou; Wing H Wong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  DNase-chip: a high-resolution method to identify DNase I hypersensitive sites using tiled microarrays.

Authors:  Gregory E Crawford; Sean Davis; Peter C Scacheri; Gabriel Renaud; Mohamad J Halawi; Michael R Erdos; Roland Green; Paul S Meltzer; Tyra G Wolfsberg; Francis S Collins
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Informative priors based on transcription factor structural class improve de novo motif discovery.

Authors:  Leelavati Narlikar; Raluca Gordân; Uwe Ohler; Alexander J Hartemink
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Distant conserved sequences flanking endothelial-specific promoters contain tissue-specific DNase-hypersensitive sites and over-represented motifs.

Authors:  John A Bernat; Gregory E Crawford; Aleksey Y Ogurtsov; Francis S Collins; David Ginsburg; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome.

Authors:  Artem Barski; Suresh Cuddapah; Kairong Cui; Tae-Young Roh; Dustin E Schones; Zhibin Wang; Gang Wei; Iouri Chepelev; Keji Zhao
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Heintzman; Rhona K Stuart; Gary Hon; Yutao Fu; Christina W Ching; R David Hawkins; Leah O Barrera; Sara Van Calcar; Chunxu Qu; Keith A Ching; Wei Wang; Zhiping Weng; Roland D Green; Gregory E Crawford; Bing Ren
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 7.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The 5' ends of Drosophila heat shock genes in chromatin are hypersensitive to DNase I.

Authors:  C Wu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-08-28       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Genome-wide profiles of STAT1 DNA association using chromatin immunoprecipitation and massively parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Gordon Robertson; Martin Hirst; Matthew Bainbridge; Misha Bilenky; Yongjun Zhao; Thomas Zeng; Ghia Euskirchen; Bridget Bernier; Richard Varhol; Allen Delaney; Nina Thiessen; Obi L Griffith; Ann He; Marco Marra; Michael Snyder; Steven Jones
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells.

Authors:  Tarjei S Mikkelsen; Manching Ku; David B Jaffe; Biju Issac; Erez Lieberman; Georgia Giannoukos; Pablo Alvarez; William Brockman; Tae-Kyung Kim; Richard P Koche; William Lee; Eric Mendenhall; Aisling O'Donovan; Aviva Presser; Carsten Russ; Xiaohui Xie; Alexander Meissner; Marius Wernig; Rudolf Jaenisch; Chad Nusbaum; Eric S Lander; Bradley E Bernstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  56 in total

1.  MCAST: scanning for cis-regulatory motif clusters.

Authors:  Charles E Grant; James Johnson; Timothy L Bailey; William Stafford Noble
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Base-resolution methylation patterns accurately predict transcription factor bindings in vivo.

Authors:  Tianlei Xu; Ben Li; Meng Zhao; Keith E Szulwach; R Craig Street; Li Lin; Bing Yao; Feiran Zhang; Peng Jin; Hao Wu; Zhaohui S Qin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Genome-wide footprinting: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Myong-Hee Sung; Songjoon Baek; Gordon L Hager
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  A DNA shape-based regulatory score improves position-weight matrix-based recognition of transcription factor binding sites.

Authors:  Jichen Yang; Stephen A Ramsey
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  Interrogating the Accessible Chromatin Landscape of Eukaryote Genomes Using ATAC-seq.

Authors:  Georgi K Marinov; Zohar Shipony
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

6.  DeFCoM: analysis and modeling of transcription factor binding sites using a motif-centric genomic footprinter.

Authors:  Bryan Quach; Terrence S Furey
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Genome-wide in silico prediction of gene expression.

Authors:  Robert C McLeay; Tom Lesluyes; Gabriel Cuellar Partida; Timothy L Bailey
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  TAD-free analysis of architectural proteins and insulators.

Authors:  Raphaël Mourad; Olivier Cuvier
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Prediction of regulatory motifs from human Chip-sequencing data using a deep learning framework.

Authors:  Jinyu Yang; Anjun Ma; Adam D Hoppe; Cankun Wang; Yang Li; Chi Zhang; Yan Wang; Bingqiang Liu; Qin Ma
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Using DNase digestion data to accurately identify transcription factor binding sites.

Authors:  Kaixuan Luo; Alexander J Hartemink
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.