Literature DB >> 22072086

Negative predictive value of intravenous contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen for patients presenting to the emergency department with undifferentiated upper abdominal pain.

Hyungjoo Ham1, Matthew D F McInnes, Michael Woo, Sylvie Lemonde.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to calculate the negative predictive value (NPV) CT of the abdomen in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with undifferentiated upper abdominal pain. Approved by the hospital research ethics board, this retrospective study examined consecutive patients presenting to the ED with undifferentiated upper abdominal pain whose intravenous contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen was reported as "normal" from June 2006-August 2010. Exclusion criteria included active malignancy, trauma, and known inflammatory bowel disease. True-negative (TN) vs. false-negative (FN) cases were categorized by consensus opinion of radiologist and emergency physician using a composite reference standard including clinical, laboratory, imaging, surgery, pathology, and patient self-reporting via phone questionnaire. The NPV was calculated with confidence intervals of 95%. The TN and FN groups were compared based on gender, age, site of pain, oral contrast use, and laboratory values. One hundred twenty-seven patients were included for analysis. The NPV was 64% (95% CI 55-72). The FN group had a higher proportion of patients with epigastric pain (p = 0.02) and a lower proportion of patients with left upper quadrant pain (p = 0.02). The WBC, lipase, and ALT were all higher in the FN group compared with the TN group. The most commonly missed pathologies were inflammatory conditions of the biliary tract and upper gastrointestinal systems. The NPV of CT for evaluation of undifferentiated upper abdominal pain in the ED was low at 64%. Physicians should consider this limitation and the commonly missed pathology when discharging patients with a "normal" CT report.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22072086     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-011-0996-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  30 in total

Review 1.  CT of bowel wall thickening: significance and pitfalls of interpretation.

Authors:  M Macari; E J Balthazar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Accuracy of MDCT in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Stephan W Anderson; Brian C Lucey; Jose C Varghese; Jorge A Soto
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Recall bias in epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  S S Coughlin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Acute biliary disease: initial CT and follow-up US versus initial US and follow-up CT.

Authors:  R T Harvey; W T Miller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Impact of CT on diagnosis and management of acute abdomen in patients initially treated without surgery.

Authors:  B Siewert; V Raptopoulos; M F Mueller; M P Rosen; M Steer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Quantifying the usefulness of CT in evaluating seniors with abdominal pain.

Authors:  Lawrence M Lewis; Allen P Klippel; Rebecca A Bavolek; Laura M Ross; Tara M Scherer; Gerald A Banet
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Cholelithiasis: evaluation with CT.

Authors:  J A Barakos; P W Ralls; S A Lapin; M B Johnson; D R Radin; P M Colletti; W D Boswell; J M Halls
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Magnifying gastroendoscopy for diagnosis of histologic gastritis in the gastric antrum.

Authors:  S Kim; K Harum; M Ito; S Tanaka; M Yoshihara; K Chayama
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.088

Review 9.  Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  E J Balthazar; P C Freeny; E vanSonnenberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Prediction rule for etiology of vague abdominal pain in the emergency room: utility for imaging triage.

Authors:  Chris Roth; Richard Tello; Kenny Sutherland; Thomas Ptak
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  3 in total

1.  Utility of CT oral contrast administration in the emergency department of a quaternary oncology hospital: diagnostic implications, turnaround times, and assessment of ED physician ordering.

Authors:  Corey T Jensen; Katherine J Blair; Ott Le; Jia Sun; Wei Wei; Brinda Rao Korivi; Ajaykumar C Morani; Nicolaus A Wagner-Bartak
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-11

2.  Retrospective cohort study on clinical predictors for acute abnormalities on CT scan in adult patients with abdominal pain.

Authors:  Hady Zgheib; Cynthia Wakil; Sami Shayya; Mohamad Kanso; Ralph Bou Chebl; Rana Bachir; Mazen El Sayed
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2020-01-27

Review 3.  Use of expert panels to define the reference standard in diagnostic research: a systematic review of published methods and reporting.

Authors:  Loes C M Bertens; Berna D L Broekhuizen; Christiana A Naaktgeboren; Frans H Rutten; Arno W Hoes; Yvonne van Mourik; Karel G M Moons; Johannes B Reitsma
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 11.069

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.