Literature DB >> 22072019

Women's perceptions of centeringpregnancy: a focus group study.

Judith W Herrman1, Stephanie Rogers, Deborah B Ehrenthal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: CenteringPregnancy, a model of group prenatal care, provides healthcare assessment, education, and support to women. The current study was designed to determine women's perceptions of the CenteringPregnancy program.
METHODS: Twenty-one women participating in CenteringPregnancy, as part of a larger study, shared their thoughts related to the strengths and weaknesses of their healthcare, thoughts on improvement, and how the care impacted their health and health behaviors. A thematic and iterative analysis process, assisted by Ethnograph 6.0, allowed for the emersion of important themes that were validated in a member check process.
RESULTS: The focus group participants provided rich insights into their prenatal experiences in CenteringPregnancy. Four substantive themes emerged from the data: It's about respect, Knowledge is Power, I'm a better mother, and Supporting each other.
CONCLUSIONS: CenteringPregnancy was well-received by urban, low-income women during their pregnancy and may have value with select populations. Themes, exemplar quotes, and participant observations may assist others interested in implementing the CenteringPregnancy model of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22072019     DOI: 10.1097/NMC.0b013e3182385204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs        ISSN: 0361-929X            Impact factor:   1.412


  7 in total

Review 1.  Group versus conventional antenatal care for women.

Authors:  Christine J Catling; Nancy Medley; Maralyn Foureur; Clare Ryan; Nicky Leap; Alison Teate; Caroline S E Homer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-04

2.  Group prenatal care: model fidelity and outcomes.

Authors:  Gina Novick; Allecia E Reid; Jessica Lewis; Trace S Kershaw; Sharon Schindler Rising; Jeannette R Ickovics
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  In a hard spot: providing group prenatal care in two urban clinics.

Authors:  Gina Novick; Lois S Sadler; Kathleen A Knafl; Nora E Groce; Holly Powell Kennedy
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.372

4.  Shared medical appointments and patient-centered experience: a mixed-methods systematic review.

Authors:  Kim H Wadsworth; Trevor G Archibald; Allison E Payne; Anita K Cleary; Byron L Haney; Adam S Hoverman
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Healthcare providers experiences with shared medical appointments for heart failure.

Authors:  Vanessa Marshall; Jeri Jewett-Tennant; Jeneen Shell-Boyd; Lauren Stevenson; Rene Hearns; Julie Gee; Kimberley Schaub; Sharon LaForest; Tracey H Taveira; Lisa Cohen; Melanie Parent; Sandesh Dev; Amy Barrette; Karen Oliver; Wen-Chih Wu; Sherry L Ball
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of customer self-audit on the quality of maternity care in Tabriz: A cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kamal Gholipour; Jafar Sadegh Tabrizi; Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi; Shabnam Iezadi; Ahmad Mardi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  A systematic review of person-centered care interventions to improve quality of facility-based delivery.

Authors:  Nicholas Rubashkin; Ruby Warnock; Nadia Diamond-Smith
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.223

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.