Literature DB >> 22071201

Right minithoracotomy versus full sternotomy for the aortic valve replacement: preliminary results.

Fabrizio Sansone1, Giuseppe Punta, Francesco Parisi, Guglielmo Mario Actis Dato, Edoardo Zingarelli, Roberto Flocco, Pier Giuseppe Forsennati, Gian Luca Bardi, Stefano del Ponte, Riccardo Casabona.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for aortic valve replacement (AVR) is going to increase with different techniques described so far. We hereby report the results of AVR through a right minithoracotomy (RM) compared to a median sternotomy (MS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred patients operated for isolated AVR by the same surgeon (chief of the department) were enrolled and allocated to: MS (group A, 50 patients, 26 females, mean age 69.9 ± 12.4 years). RM (group B, 50 patients, 27 females, mean age 71.6 ± 11.2 years). Mean logistic Euroscores were, respectively, 6.5 ± 4.0 and 8.0 ± 5.9 (p=ns).
RESULTS: Mean duration of cardiopulmonary by-pass (CPB) was 62.8 ± 18.3 min in group A and 101.4 ± 35.2 min in group B (p<0.05); cross-clamp was 44.8 ± 13.4 min in group A and 74.6 ± 26.7 min in group B (p<0.05). Thirty-day mortality was 2 (4%) in group A and 0 in group B (p=ns). ICU stay and hospital stay did not significantly differ amongst two groups. The incidence of bleeding was lower in group B, showing a slight reduction of blood transfusions and re-explorations (p=ns).
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that RM offers a good 30-day survival and a lower incidence of mediastinitis or osteomyelitis. The risk of insufficient vision or sudden complications is safely managed by enlarging the surgical incision through a transverse sternotomy. Copyright Â
© 2011 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22071201     DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2011.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung Circ        ISSN: 1443-9506            Impact factor:   2.975


  7 in total

Review 1.  Custodiol for myocardial protection and preservation: a systematic review.

Authors:  J James B Edelman; Michael Seco; Ben Dunne; Shannon J Matzelle; Michelle Murphy; Pragnesh Joshi; Tristan D Yan; Michael K Wilson; Paul G Bannon; Michael P Vallely; Jurgen Passage
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-11

2.  Aortic Valve Replacement: Treatment by Sternotomy versus Minimally Invasive Approach.

Authors:  Renata Tosoni Rodrigues Ferreira; Roberto Rocha e Silva; Evaldo Marchi
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

Review 3.  Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Bilal H Kirmani; Sion G Jones; S C Malaisrie; Darryl A Chung; Richard Jnn Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-10

4.  A comparison of aortic valve replacement via an anterior right minithoracotomy with standard sternotomy: a propensity score analysis of 492 patients.

Authors:  Michael E Bowdish; Dawn S Hui; John D Cleveland; Wendy J Mack; Raina Sinha; Rupesh Ranjan; Robbin G Cohen; Craig J Baker; Mark J Cunningham; Mark L Barr; Vaughn A Starnes
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  Right anterior mini-thoracotomy vs. conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a propensity-matched comparison.

Authors:  Mauro Del Giglio; Elisa Mikus; Roberto Nerla; Antonio Micari; Simone Calvi; Alberto Tripodi; Gianluca Campo; Elisa Maietti; Fausto Castriota; Alberto Cremonesi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Comparing Aortic Valve Replacement through Right Anterolateral Thoracotomy with Median Sternotomy.

Authors:  Abdul Gani Ahangar; Aakib Hamid Charag; Mohd Lateef Wani; Farooq Ahmad Ganie; Shyam Singh; Syed Asrar Ahmad Qadri; Zameer Ahmad Shah
Journal:  Int Cardiovasc Res J       Date:  2013-09-01

7.  Initial Experience with Aortic Valve Replacement via a Minimally Invasive Approach: A Comparison of Stented, Stentless and Sutureless Valves.

Authors:  Johanna Konertz; Konstantin Zhigalov; Alexander Weymann; Pascal M Dohmen
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-04-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.