Literature DB >> 22071024

Predictors of bone mineral density testing in patients at high risk of osteoporosis: secondary analyses from the OSTEOPHARM randomized trial.

Nesé Yuksel1, Ross T Tsuyuki, Sumit R Majumdar.   

Abstract

In a randomized trial, we demonstrated that a community pharmacist osteoporosis screening intervention doubled the rates of bone mineral density (BMD) testing in high-risk patients. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to evaluate the potentially modifiable factors associated with BMD testing. From 2005 to 2007, 15 pharmacies randomized 262 patients to intervention (education, pamphlets, point-of-care quantitative heel ultrasound [QUS]) or usual care. The main outcome was BMD testing within 4mo. Multivariate regression was used to determine independent correlates of BMD testing. The median age of the cohort was 62yr, 65% were women, and 49% (n=129) were randomized to intervention. Compared with patients who were not tested, those with BMD were more likely to be women (p=0.007) and have excellent or very good health (p<0.001). Postrandomization correlates of BMD test were intervention (p=0.017), greater osteoporosis knowledge (p=0.004), and osteoporosis-specific physician visits (p<0.001). In adjusted analyses, only female sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-7.4) and osteoporosis-specific visits (aOR: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.4-7.8) were independently associated with BMD testing. In analyses restricted to intervention patients, abnormal QUS (aOR: 3.7, 95% CI: 1.4-9.1) was the only independent predictor of BMD test. Future interventions should incorporate the finding that osteoporosis-specific visits and abnormal QUS results were strongly associated with getting a BMD testing and should give greater attention to men.
Copyright © 2012 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22071024     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  3 in total

Review 1.  Patient education in osteoporosis prevention: a systematic review focusing on methodological quality of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Jana-Carina Morfeld; Vera Vennedey; Dirk Müller; Dawid Pieper; Stephanie Stock
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Pharmacist interventions in osteoporosis management: a systematic review.

Authors:  Catherine Laird; Helen Benson; Kylie A Williams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 5.071

3.  A Systematic Review of the Effect of Individualized Risk Communication Strategies on Screening Uptake and Its Psychological Predictors: The Role of Psychology Theory.

Authors:  Kathryn Bould; Blanaid Daly; Stephen Dunne; Suzanne Scott; Koula Asimakopoulou
Journal:  Health Psychol Res       Date:  2016-12-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.