Literature DB >> 22070989

International casemix and funding models: lessons for rehabilitation.

Lynne Turner-Stokes1, Stephen Sutch, Robert Dredge, Kathy Eagar.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This series of articles for rehabilitation in practice aims to cover a knowledge element of the rehabilitation medicine curriculum. Nevertheless they are intended to be of interest to a multidisciplinary audience. The competency addressed in this article is 'An understanding of the different international models for funding of health care services and casemix systems, as exemplified by those in the US, Australia and the UK.'
BACKGROUND: Payment for treatment in healthcare systems around the world is increasingly based on fixed tariff models to drive up efficiency and contain costs. Casemix classifications, however, must account adequately for the resource implications of varying case complexity. Rehabilitation poses some particular challenges for casemix development.
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this educational narrative review are (a) to provide an overview of the development of casemix in rehabilitation, (b) to describe key characteristics of some well-established casemix and payment models in operation around the world and (c) to explore opportunities for future development arising from the lessons learned.
RESULTS: Diagnosis alone does not adequately describe cost variation in rehabilitation. Functional dependency is considered a better cost indicator, and casemix classifications for inpatient rehabilitation in the United States and Australia rely on the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Fixed episode-based prospective payment systems are shown to contain costs, but at the expense of poorer functional outcomes. More sophisticated models incorporating a mixture of episode and weighted per diem rates may offer greater flexibility to optimize outcome, while still providing incentive for throughput.
CONCLUSION: The development of casemix in rehabilitation poses similar challenges for healthcare systems all around the world. Well-established casemix systems in the United States and Australia have afforded valuable lessons for other countries to learn from, but have not provided all the answers. A range of casemix and payment models is required to cater for different healthcare cultures, and casemix tools must capture all the key cost-determinants of treatment for patients with complex needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22070989     DOI: 10.1177/0269215511417468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rehabil        ISSN: 0269-2155            Impact factor:   3.477


  10 in total

1.  Research on the Current Situation and Countermeasures of Inpatient Cost and Medical Insurance Payment Method for Rehabilitation Services in City S.

Authors:  Dongfeng Tang; Jinwei Bian; Meihui He; Ning Yang; Dan Zhang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-28

2.  The Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment scale: a psychometric analysis from a large multicentre neurorehabilitation dataset.

Authors:  Roxana Alexandrescu; Richard J Siegert; Lynne Turner-Stokes
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.033

3.  Assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in neurological rehabilitation: translation, adaptation and face validity of the Danish version of Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended.

Authors:  Thomas Maribo; Asger R Pedersen; Jim Jensen; Jørgen F Nielsen
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.474

4.  Length of Hospital Stay After Stroke: A Korean Nationwide Study.

Authors:  Ji-Ho Kang; Hee-Joon Bae; Young-Ah Choi; Sang Heon Lee; Hyung Ik Shin
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2016-08-24

5.  Phase of Illness in palliative care: Cross-sectional analysis of clinical data from community, hospital and hospice patients.

Authors:  Harriet Mather; Ping Guo; Alice Firth; Joanna M Davies; Nigel Sykes; Alison Landon; Fliss E M Murtagh
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 4.762

6.  Hospital financing of ischaemic stroke: determinants of funding and usefulness of DRG subcategories based on severity of illness.

Authors:  Sarah Dewilde; Lieven Annemans; Hilde Pincé; Vincent Thijs
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Responsiveness of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability And Health (ICF) Clinical Functioning Information Tool (ClinFIT) in Routine Clinical Practice in an Australian Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting.

Authors:  Bhasker Amatya; Alaeldin Elmalik; Krystal Song; Su Yi Lee; Mary P Galea; Fary Khan
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Capturing patients' needs in casemix: a systematic literature review on the value of adding functioning information in reimbursement systems.

Authors:  Maren Hopfe; Gerold Stucki; Ric Marshall; Conal D Twomey; T Bedirhan Üstün; Birgit Prodinger
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Development and validation of a casemix classification to predict costs of specialist palliative care provision across inpatient hospice, hospital and community settings in the UK: a study protocol.

Authors:  Ping Guo; Mendwas Dzingina; Alice M Firth; Joanna M Davies; Abdel Douiri; Suzanne M O'Brien; Cathryn Pinto; Sophie Pask; Irene J Higginson; Kathy Eagar; Fliss E M Murtagh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Challenges and Adverse Outcomes of Implementing Reimbursement Mechanisms Based on the Diagnosis-Related Group Classification System: A systematic review.

Authors:  Mohsen Barouni; Leila Ahmadian; Hossein Saberi Anari; Elham Mohsenbeigi
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2020-10-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.