BACKGROUND: Identification of T-cell reactivity to β-cell antigen epitopes is an important goal for studying pathogenesis and for designing and monitoring of immunotherapeutic interventions in type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: We performed a multicentre validation of known human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I CD8+ T-cell epitopes. To this end, peripheral blood T-cell responses were measured in 35 recently (<2 years) diagnosed HLA-A*02:01+ T1D patients using blind-coded HLA-A2 tetramers (TMrs) and pentamers (PMrs), encompassing two epitopes of preproinsulin (PPI; PPIA12-20 and PPIB10-18) and two epitopes of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD; GAD114-122 and GAD536-545). We also compared the readout of TMrs and PMrs with a CD8+ T-cell interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay. RESULTS: Despite the minute frequencies of autoreactive cells detected by TMrs/PMrs, most (73-77%) T1D patients had responses to one or more of the epitopes used. All four epitopes were recognized by T1D patients, with a prevalence ranging from 5 to 25%. TMrs and PMrs detected more positive responses to the β-cell epitopes than CD8+ T-cell interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot. However, concordance between positive responses to TMrs and PMrs was limited. CONCLUSIONS: Using a multicentre blind-coded setup and three different T-cell assays, we have validated PPI and GAD epitopes as commonly recognized CD8+ T-cell targets in recently diagnosed T1D patients. Both TMrs and PMrs showed higher detection sensitivity than the CD8+ T-cell interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay. However, there are some important methodological issues that need to be addressed in using these sensitive techniques for detecting low frequency responses.
BACKGROUND: Identification of T-cell reactivity to β-cell antigen epitopes is an important goal for studying pathogenesis and for designing and monitoring of immunotherapeutic interventions in type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: We performed a multicentre validation of known human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I CD8+ T-cell epitopes. To this end, peripheral blood T-cell responses were measured in 35 recently (<2 years) diagnosed HLA-A*02:01+ T1D patients using blind-coded HLA-A2 tetramers (TMrs) and pentamers (PMrs), encompassing two epitopes of preproinsulin (PPI; PPIA12-20 and PPIB10-18) and two epitopes of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD; GAD114-122 and GAD536-545). We also compared the readout of TMrs and PMrs with a CD8+ T-cell interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay. RESULTS: Despite the minute frequencies of autoreactive cells detected by TMrs/PMrs, most (73-77%) T1D patients had responses to one or more of the epitopes used. All four epitopes were recognized by T1D patients, with a prevalence ranging from 5 to 25%. TMrs and PMrs detected more positive responses to the β-cell epitopes than CD8+ T-cell interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot. However, concordance between positive responses to TMrs and PMrs was limited. CONCLUSIONS: Using a multicentre blind-coded setup and three different T-cell assays, we have validated PPI and GAD epitopes as commonly recognized CD8+ T-cell targets in recently diagnosed T1D patients. Both TMrs and PMrs showed higher detection sensitivity than the CD8+ T-cell interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay. However, there are some important methodological issues that need to be addressed in using these sensitive techniques for detecting low frequency responses.
Authors: Simi Ahmed; Karen Cerosaletti; Eddie James; S Alice Long; Stuart Mannering; Cate Speake; Maki Nakayama; Timothy Tree; Bart O Roep; Kevan C Herold; Todd M Brusko Journal: Diabetes Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: R R Knight; G Dolton; D Kronenberg-Versteeg; M Eichmann; M Zhao; G C Huang; K Beck; D K Cole; A K Sewell; A Skowera; M Peakman Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Ania Skowera; Kristin Ladell; David A Price; Mark Peakman; James E McLaren; Garry Dolton; Katherine K Matthews; Emma Gostick; Deborah Kronenberg-Versteeg; Martin Eichmann; Robin R Knight; Susanne Heck; Jake Powrie; Polly J Bingley; Colin M Dayan; John J Miles; Andrew K Sewell Journal: Diabetes Date: 2014-09-23 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: T Alexander; A Bondanza; P A Muraro; R Greco; R Saccardi; T Daikeler; M Kazmi; C Hawkey; B P Simoes; K Leblanc; W E Fibbe; J Moore; E Snarski; T Martin; F Hiepe; A Velardi; A Toubert; J A Snowden; D Farge Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2014-11-10 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Cate Speake; Henry T Bahnson; Johnna D Wesley; Nikole Perdue; David Friedrich; Minh N Pham; Erinn Lanxon-Cookson; William W Kwok; Birgit Sehested Hansen; Matthias von Herrath; Carla J Greenbaum Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Howard R Seay; Erik Yusko; Stephanie J Rothweiler; Lin Zhang; Amanda L Posgai; Martha Campbell-Thompson; Marissa Vignali; Ryan O Emerson; John S Kaddis; Dave Ko; Maki Nakayama; Mia J Smith; John C Cambier; Alberto Pugliese; Mark A Atkinson; Harlan S Robins; Todd M Brusko Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2016-12-08
Authors: Satwinder Kaur Singh; Bart Tummers; Ton N Schumacher; Raquel Gomez; Kees L M C Franken; Els M Verdegaal; Karoline Laske; Cécile Gouttefangeas; Christian Ottensmeier; Marij J P Welters; Cedrik M Britten; Sjoerd H van der Burg Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 6.968