Literature DB >> 22069235

Perfusion parameters analysis of the vertebral bone marrow in patients with Ph¹⁻ chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph(neg) MPN): a dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) study.

Nikos Courcoutsakis1, Athina Spanoudaki, Thomas G Maris, Emmanuel Astrinakis, Emmanuel Spanoudakis, Constantinos Tsatalas, Panos Prassopoulos.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate perfusion parameters of the vertebral bone marrow in patients with Philadelphia negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph(neg) MPN) using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study enrolled 24 patients with Ph(neg) MPN: 12 patients with myelofibrosis (Group A), 6 with essential thrombocythemia (ET), and 6 with polycythemia vera (PV) (Group B) who underwent DCE-MRI of the lumbosacral spine. Twelve normal individuals served as control group (Group C). Wash-in (WIN), wash-out (WOUT), maximum contrast-enhancement (CE  max), time-to-peak (TTPK), time-to-maximum slope (TMSP), and the WIN/TMSP ratio (WTSP) were calculated.
RESULTS: WIN, CE(max) , and WTSP parameters were higher in Group A than in Group C (P < 0.05). These parameters were significant (P < 0.0001) in discriminating patients with myelofibrosis from normal individuals with sensitivities 74.14%, 87.93%, 74.14%, and specificities 91.07%, 83.93%, 91.07%, respectively. WIN, WOUT, CE(max) , and WTSP parameters were higher in Group A than in Group B (P < 0.05). Group B exhibited no differences in perfusion parameters as compared with Group C with the exception of WOUT.
CONCLUSION: Patients with myelofibrosis exhibited increased perfusion parameters in vertebral bone marrow, which could be consisted with increased vascularity, probably related to neoangiogenesis as opposed to ET or PV patients showing no increased perfusion. DCE-MRI may be of value in discriminating subgroups of Ph(neg) MPN patients and in indicating those progressing to myelofibrosis.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22069235     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  5 in total

1.  Study of proximal femoral bone perfusion with 3D T1 dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Jean-François Budzik; Guillaume Lefebvre; Gerard Forzy; Mazen El Rafei; David Chechin; Anne Cotten
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Dynamic MR imaging of osteoid osteomas: correlation of semiquantitative and quantitative perfusion parameters with patient symptoms and treatment outcome.

Authors:  Pedro A Gondim Teixeira; Anne Chanson; Marine Beaumont; Sophie Lecocq; Matthias Louis; Béatrice Marie; François Sirveaux; Alain Blum
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Effect of arterial deprivation on growing femoral epiphysis: quantitative magnetic resonance imaging using a piglet model.

Authors:  Jung-Eun Cheon; Won Joon Yoo; In-One Kim; Woo Sun Kim; Young Hun Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  The value of bone marrow, liver, and spleen imaging in diagnosis, prognostication, and follow-up monitoring of myeloproliferative neoplasms: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stefanie Slot; Niels W C J van de Donk; René H J Otten; Bouke J H Boden; Josée Zijlstra; Pieter G H M Raijmakers; Sonja Zweegman
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.909

5.  A Pilot Study of Quantitative MRI Parametric Response Mapping of Bone Marrow Fat for Treatment Assessment in Myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Gary D Luker; Huong Marie Nguyen; Benjamin A Hoff; Craig J Galbán; Diego Hernando; Thomas L Chenevert; Moshe Talpaz; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2016-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.