Literature DB >> 22069077

Comparison of Comet assay dose-response for ethyl methanesulfonate using freshly prepared versus cryopreserved tissues.

Leslie Recio1, Grace E Kissling, Cheryl A Hobbs, Kristine L Witt.   

Abstract

The National Toxicology Program (NTP) is using the Comet assay to evaluate genotoxic potential, and is investigating the integration of this assay into repeat-dose toxicity studies. To reduce sample-to-sample variability, address logistical concerns associated with evaluating multiple tissues from many animals, and accommodate sample collection at geographically distant testing facilities, tissue samples collected for Comet analysis by the NTP are routinely flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in a -80°C freezer until evaluation. To compare data obtained from frozen tissues to data from freshly isolated tissues, we conducted a dose-response study in male Sprague Dawley rats. Rats (5 per treatment group) were administered ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS; 0, 25, 50, 100, or 200 mg/kg) by gavage twice at an interval of 21 hr; blood, liver, stomach, and colon tissues were harvested 3 hr after the second treatment. Single-cell preparations from each of the four tissues were put into Hank's balanced salt solution with 10% fresh dimethyl sulfoxide. One aliquot of each tissue preparation was used for immediate analysis, while additional aliquots were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in a -80°C freezer for 1 or 8 weeks. One set of 8-week frozen samples was shipped roundtrip via air courier from Research Triangle Park, NC to Rochester, NY prior to analysis. For all four tissues, results from frozen, nontransported samples showed a similar dose-response pattern for EMS-induced genotoxicity. We also demonstrated that for three tissues (blood, liver, stomach), air transport did not alter the sensitivity of the Comet assay for detecting DNA damage.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22069077     DOI: 10.1002/em.20694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  7 in total

1.  A comparison of transgenic rodent mutation and in vivo comet assay responses for 91 chemicals.

Authors:  David Kirkland; Dan D Levy; Matthew J LeBaron; Marilyn J Aardema; Carol Beevers; Javed Bhalli; George R Douglas; Patricia A Escobar; Christopher S Farabaugh; Melanie Guerard; George E Johnson; Rohan Kulkarni; Frank Le Curieux; Alexandra S Long; Jasmin Lott; David P Lovell; Mirjam Luijten; Francesco Marchetti; John J Nicolette; Stefan Pfuhler; Daniel J Roberts; Leon F Stankowski; Veronique Thybaud; Sandy K Weiner; Andrew Williams; Kristine L Witt; Robert Young
Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 2.873

Review 2.  High throughput sample processing and automated scoring.

Authors:  Gunnar Brunborg; Petra Jackson; Sergey Shaposhnikov; Hildegunn Dahl; Amaya Azqueta; Andrew R Collins; Kristine B Gutzkow
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Cryopreservation of ovaries from neonatal marmoset monkeys.

Authors:  Hideyuki H Motohashi; Hidetoshi Ishibashi
Journal:  Exp Anim       Date:  2016-02-15

4.  Evaluation of Genotoxic Pressure along the Sava River.

Authors:  Stoimir Kolarević; Mustafa Aborgiba; Margareta Kračun-Kolarević; Jovana Kostić; Predrag Simonović; Vladica Simić; Aleksandra Milošković; Georg Reischer; Andreas Farnleitner; Zoran Gačić; Radmila Milačič; Tea Zuliani; Janja Vidmar; Marija Pergal; Marina Piria; Momir Paunović; Branka Vuković-Gačić
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Genetic and rat toxicity studies of cyclodextrin glucanotransferase.

Authors:  Robert R Maronpot; Cheryl A Hobbs; Jeffrey Davis; Carol Swartz; Molly Boyle; Mihoko Koyanagi; Shim-Mo Hayashi
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2016-03-07

6.  Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cell phone radiofrequency radiation in male and female rats and mice following subchronic exposure.

Authors:  Stephanie L Smith-Roe; Michael E Wyde; Matthew D Stout; John W Winters; Cheryl A Hobbs; Kim G Shepard; Amanda S Green; Grace E Kissling; Keith R Shockley; Raymond R Tice; John R Bucher; Kristine L Witt
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  Validation of freezing tissues and cells for analysis of DNA strand break levels by comet assay.

Authors:  Petra Jackson; Lourdes M Pedersen; Zdenka O Kyjovska; Nicklas R Jacobsen; Anne T Saber; Karin S Hougaard; Ulla Vogel; Håkan Wallin
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.000

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.