Literature DB >> 22068989

Reporting of effect direction and size in abstracts of systematic reviews.

Elaine M Beller1, Paul P Glasziou, Sally Hopewell, Douglas G Altman.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 22068989     DOI： 10.1001/jama.2011.1620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN： 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

1.  Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.

Authors:  Matthew J Page; Joanne E McKenzie; Jamie Kirkham; Kerry Dwan; Sharon Kramer; Sally Green; Andrew Forbes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-10-01

2.  A methodological survey of the analysis, reporting and interpretation of Absolute Risk ReductiOn in systematic revieWs (ARROW): a study protocol.

Authors:  Pablo Alonso-Coello; Alonso Carrasco-Labra; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Ignacio Neumann; Elie A Akl; Xin Sun; Bradley C Johnston; Matthias Briel; Jason W Busse; Demián Glujovsky; Carlos E Granados; Alfonso Iorio; Affan Irfan; Laura Martínez García; Laura M García; Reem A Mustafa; Anggie Ramirez-Morera; Iván Solà; Kari A O Tikkinen; Shanil Ebrahim; Per O Vandvik; Yuqing Zhang; Anna Selva; Andrea J Sanabria; Oscar E Zazueta; Robin W M Vernooij; Holger J Schünemann; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-13

3.  Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers' interpretation: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Amélie Yavchitz; Philippe Ravaud; Sally Hopewell; Gabriel Baron; Isabelle Boutron
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Developing evidence-based dentistry skills: how to interpret randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews.

Authors:  Juliana Kiriakou; Nikolaos Pandis; Phoebus Madianos; Argy Polychronopoulou
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.750

5.  A comparison of quality of abstracts of systematic reviews including meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in high-impact general medicine journals before and after the publication of PRISMA extension for abstracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jean Joel R Bigna; Lewis N Um; Jobert Richie N Nansseu
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-13

6.  Reporting quality in abstracts of meta-analyses of depression screening tool accuracy: a review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Danielle B Rice; Lorie A Kloda; Ian Shrier; Brett D Thombs
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Are child-centric aspects in newborn and child health systematic review and meta-analysis protocols and reports adequately reported?-two systematic reviews.

Authors:  Mufiza Farid-Kapadia; Kariym C Joachim; Chrinna Balasingham; April Clyburne-Sherin; Martin Offringa
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-06

8.  PRISMA for Abstracts: reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts.

Authors:  Elaine M Beller; Paul P Glasziou; Douglas G Altman; Sally Hopewell; Hilda Bastian; Iain Chalmers; Peter C Gøtzsche; Toby Lasserson; David Tovey
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 9.  Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Vivian Welch; Mark Petticrew; Jennifer Petkovic; David Moher; Elizabeth Waters; Howard White; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2015-10-08

10.  Looking back on your statistical tool.

Authors:  Younsuk Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.