Soyang Kwon1, Ningqi Hou, Meme Wang. 1. Consortium to Lower Obesity in Chicago Children, Children's Memorial Hospital, 2300 Children's Plaza, Chicago, IL 60614, USA. skwon@childrensmemorial.org
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to compare physical activity (PA) levels between cancer survivors and those without cancer diagnosis (non-cancer participants). METHODS: Using data from the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we conducted secondary data analysis to compare PA between 31,078 cancer survivors with history of single-site cancer diagnosis at least 2 years prior to the survey, including cancer survivors of prostate [n = 2,951], female breast [n = 5,695], colon [n = 1,436], cervix [n = 2,211], endometrium [n = 1,080], and ovary [n = 732], and 235,351 non-cancer participants between 40 and 79 years of age. Self-reported PA and cancer history data were collected through telephone interviews. Weekly moderate- to vigorous-intensity PA levels were calculated in moderate-to-intensity physical activity equivalent (MIE). Least-squares means of MIE were obtained from sex, age groups (40-64 years [middle-aged] and 65-79 years [older]), and cancer site-specific multivariable linear regression models, adjusting for age, age(2), race/ethnicity, household income, and education. RESULTS: Prostate cancer survivors reported participating in approximately 20 min/week more MIE, compared to their non-cancer counterparts (P < 0.10 for the middle-aged group; P < 0.01 for the older group). Middle-aged cervical and endometrial cancer survivors reported approximately 10 min/week less MIE (P < 0.05 and P < 0.15, respectively). Adjusted means of MIE were not different between cancer survivors of colon, female breast, or ovary and non-cancer participants. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates higher PA levels among prostate cancer survivors and lower PA levels among middle-aged cervical and endometrial cancer survivors, compared to sex- and age group-matched general populations.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to compare physical activity (PA) levels between cancer survivors and those without cancer diagnosis (non-cancerparticipants). METHODS: Using data from the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we conducted secondary data analysis to compare PA between 31,078 cancer survivors with history of single-site cancer diagnosis at least 2 years prior to the survey, including cancer survivors of prostate [n = 2,951], female breast [n = 5,695], colon [n = 1,436], cervix [n = 2,211], endometrium [n = 1,080], and ovary [n = 732], and 235,351 non-cancerparticipants between 40 and 79 years of age. Self-reported PA and cancer history data were collected through telephone interviews. Weekly moderate- to vigorous-intensity PA levels were calculated in moderate-to-intensity physical activity equivalent (MIE). Least-squares means of MIE were obtained from sex, age groups (40-64 years [middle-aged] and 65-79 years [older]), and cancer site-specific multivariable linear regression models, adjusting for age, age(2), race/ethnicity, household income, and education. RESULTS:Prostate cancer survivors reported participating in approximately 20 min/week more MIE, compared to their non-cancer counterparts (P < 0.10 for the middle-aged group; P < 0.01 for the older group). Middle-aged cervical and endometrial cancer survivors reported approximately 10 min/week less MIE (P < 0.05 and P < 0.15, respectively). Adjusted means of MIE were not different between cancer survivors of colon, female breast, or ovary and non-cancerparticipants. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates higher PA levels among prostate cancer survivors and lower PA levels among middle-aged cervical and endometrial cancer survivors, compared to sex- and age group-matched general populations.
Authors: Bernardine M Pinto; Nancy C Maruyama; Matthew M Clark; Dean G Cruess; Elyse Park; Mary Roberts Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Michelle M Yore; Sandra A Ham; Barbara E Ainsworth; Judy Kruger; Jared P Reis; Harold W Kohl; Caroline A Macera Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Brigid M Lynch; David W Dunstan; Genevieve N Healy; Elisabeth Winkler; Elizabeth Eakin; Neville Owen Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2009-11-01 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Jean K Brown; Tim Byers; Colleen Doyle; Kerry S Coumeya; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Lawrence H Kushi; Anne McTieman; Cheryl L Rock; Noreen Aziz; Abby S Bloch; Barbara Eldridge; Kathryn Hamilton; Carolyn Katzin; Amy Koonce; Julie Main; Connie Mobley; Marion E Morra; Margaret S Pierce; Kimberly Andrews Sawyer Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2003 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Elizabeth G Eakin; Danny R Youlden; Peter D Baade; Sheleigh P Lawler; Marina M Reeves; Jane S Heyworth; Lin Fritschi Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2007-07-19 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Amerigo Rossi; Carol Ewing Garber; Gurpreet Kaur; Xiaonan Xue; Gary L Goldberg; Nicole S Nevadunsky Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Shirley M Bluethmann; Wayne Foo; Renate M Winkels; Scherezade K Mama; Kathryn H Schmitz Journal: J Aging Phys Act Date: 2020-04-24 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Ashley F Haggerty; David B Sarwer; Kathryn H Schmitz; Emily M Ko; Kelly C Allison; Christina S Chu Journal: Nutr Cancer Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 2.900
Authors: Sarah J Kitson; Olivia Aurangzeb; Jawaria Parvaiz; Artitaya Lophatananon; Kenneth R Muir; Emma J Crosbie Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2022-09-01
Authors: Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Michael L Pennell; Nazmus Saquib; Michelle Naughton; Xiaochen Zhang; Aladdin H Shadyab; Candyce H Kroenke; Jennifer W Bea; Lindsay L Peterson; Tracy Crane; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Electra D Paskett Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2021-12-07 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Ashley F Haggerty; Sarah Huepenbecker; David B Sarwer; Jacqueline Spitzer; Greer Raggio; Christina S Chu; Emily Ko; Kelly C Allison Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-11-28 Impact factor: 5.482