Jin Hyun Cho1, Kyoung Mee Kim, Miyeon Kwon, Jung Han Kim, Jeeyun Lee. 1. Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Irwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Patients with metastatic melanoma have a poor prognosis and few treatment options are available. We evaluated the anti-tumor activity and safety of nilotinib, a KIT inhibitor, in patients with metastatic melanoma harboring KIT alterations, either mutations or amplifications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was open-label, single center, prospective phase II clinical trial. Between October 2009 and April 2011, 11 patients with metastatic melanoma harboring KIT gene mutations or KIT gene amplifications were enrolled in the first stage of phase II study and nilotinib was administered orally at a dose of 400 mg twice a day until disease progression or intolerable toxicities. The primary endpoint was response rate and secondary endpoints were safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 11 patients, 9 patients were evaluable for treatment response. Of 9 patients, three patients had KIT mutations in exon 11, Leu576Pro, Val559Ala and Lys558Arg; and 6 patients had KIT amplifications > 50 copies compared to control DNA. Two patients achieved partial response (22.2%) and 5 patients achieved stable disease (55.6%). In two patients who responded to nilotinib, both had KIT mutations and showed durable response for 8.4 months and 10.0+ months. Of note, one patient with KIT amplification had stable disease with response for 6 months. A decrease in tumor size from baseline was observed in four patients (44.4%). Nilotinib 800 mg/d was very well tolerated with grade 1 nausea and grade 1 dry-eye being the most common adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: We have decided to publish the preliminary results because anti-tumor activity of nilotinib was promising in KIT mutated patients. Although our results are preliminary, nilotinib had very favorable toxicity profile with durable response in metastatic melanoma patients with KIT mutations. The anti-tumor activity of nilotinib in melanoma patients with KIT amplification is yet to be determined in future studies. Currently, phase II nilotinib trial is ongoing in Korea as multi-center study.
PURPOSE: Patients with metastatic melanoma have a poor prognosis and few treatment options are available. We evaluated the anti-tumor activity and safety of nilotinib, a KIT inhibitor, in patients with metastatic melanoma harboring KIT alterations, either mutations or amplifications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was open-label, single center, prospective phase II clinical trial. Between October 2009 and April 2011, 11 patients with metastatic melanoma harboring KIT gene mutations or KIT gene amplifications were enrolled in the first stage of phase II study and nilotinib was administered orally at a dose of 400 mg twice a day until disease progression or intolerable toxicities. The primary endpoint was response rate and secondary endpoints were safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 11 patients, 9 patients were evaluable for treatment response. Of 9 patients, three patients had KIT mutations in exon 11, Leu576Pro, Val559Ala and Lys558Arg; and 6 patients had KIT amplifications > 50 copies compared to control DNA. Two patients achieved partial response (22.2%) and 5 patients achieved stable disease (55.6%). In two patients who responded to nilotinib, both had KIT mutations and showed durable response for 8.4 months and 10.0+ months. Of note, one patient with KIT amplification had stable disease with response for 6 months. A decrease in tumor size from baseline was observed in four patients (44.4%). Nilotinib 800 mg/d was very well tolerated with grade 1 nausea and grade 1 dry-eye being the most common adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: We have decided to publish the preliminary results because anti-tumor activity of nilotinib was promising in KIT mutated patients. Although our results are preliminary, nilotinib had very favorable toxicity profile with durable response in metastatic melanoma patients with KIT mutations. The anti-tumor activity of nilotinib in melanoma patients with KIT amplification is yet to be determined in future studies. Currently, phase II nilotinib trial is ongoing in Korea as multi-center study.
Authors: Jun Guo; Lu Si; Yan Kong; Keith T Flaherty; Xiaowei Xu; Yanyan Zhu; Christopher L Corless; Li Li; Haifu Li; Xinan Sheng; Chuanliang Cui; Zhihong Chi; Siming Li; Mei Han; Lili Mao; Xuede Lin; Nan Du; Xiaoshi Zhang; Junling Li; Baocheng Wang; Shukui Qin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jun Ho Yi; Seong Yoon Yi; Hye Ran Lee; Soon Il Lee; Do Hyoung Lim; Jung Han Kim; Keon Woo Park; Jeeyun Lee Journal: Melanoma Res Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Carol Beadling; Erick Jacobson-Dunlop; F Stephen Hodi; Claudia Le; Andrea Warrick; Janice Patterson; Ajia Town; Amy Harlow; Frank Cruz; Sharl Azar; Brian P Rubin; Susan Muller; Rob West; Michael C Heinrich; Christopher L Corless Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-11-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Xiaofeng Jiang; Jun Zhou; Noah K Yuen; Christopher L Corless; Michael C Heinrich; Jonathan A Fletcher; George D Demetri; Hans R Widlund; David E Fisher; F Stephen Hodi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-12-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ellen Weisberg; Paul W Manley; Werner Breitenstein; Josef Brüggen; Sandra W Cowan-Jacob; Arghya Ray; Brian Huntly; Doriano Fabbro; Gabriele Fendrich; Elizabeth Hall-Meyers; Andrew L Kung; Jürgen Mestan; George Q Daley; Linda Callahan; Laurie Catley; Cara Cavazza; Mohammad Azam; Azam Mohammed; Donna Neuberg; Renee D Wright; D Gary Gilliland; James D Griffin Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Hans Prenen; Gunther Guetens; Gert de Boeck; Maria Debiec-Rychter; Paul Manley; Patrick Schoffski; Allan T van Oosterom; Ernst de Bruijn Journal: Pharmacology Date: 2006-03-08 Impact factor: 2.547
Authors: Angela Hamblin; Sarah Wordsworth; Jilles M Fermont; Suzanne Page; Kulvinder Kaur; Carme Camps; Pamela Kaisaki; Avinash Gupta; Denis Talbot; Mark Middleton; Shirley Henderson; Anthony Cutts; Dimitrios V Vavoulis; Nick Housby; Ian Tomlinson; Jenny C Taylor; Anna Schuh Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Emma Shtivelman; Michael Q A Davies; Patrick Hwu; James Yang; Michal Lotem; Moshe Oren; Keith T Flaherty; David E Fisher Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2014-04-15
Authors: Catherine B Meador; Christine M Micheel; Mia A Levy; Christine M Lovly; Leora Horn; Jeremy L Warner; Douglas B Johnson; Zhongming Zhao; Ingrid A Anderson; Jeffrey A Sosman; Cindy L Vnencak-Jones; Kimberly B Dahlman; William Pao Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 12.531