Literature DB >> 22067762

Immediate versus delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device following dilation and evacuation: a randomized controlled trial.

Heather L Hohmann1, Matthew F Reeves, Beatrice A Chen, Lisa K Perriera, Jennifer L Hayes, Mitchell D Creinin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to compare 6-month usage of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) when placed immediately or 3 to 6 weeks after dilation and evacuation (D&E) procedure. STUDY
DESIGN: We enrolled women undergoing D&E at 15 to 23 weeks of gestation. After completion of the D&E, subjects without contraindications to immediate IUD insertion were randomized to immediate or delayed (3 to 6 weeks later) LNG-IUD insertion. Subjects in the immediate group had the LNG-IUD placed using ultrasound guidance. All subjects returned at 3 to 6 weeks and 8 to 10 weeks after D&E and were contacted by phone at 6 months.
RESULTS: Of the 93 subjects enrolled, 88 were randomized. All 44 subjects (100%) randomized to immediate insertion had successful IUD placement, while only 20 (45.5%) of the 44 subjects randomized to delayed insertion returned for IUD placement, all of which were successful [difference 54.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 39.8%-69.3%]. Seventeen (38.6%) participants in each group were lost to follow-up. Of subjects contacted at the 6-month follow-up phone call, 23 of 27 women (85.2%) and 17 of 27 women (62.9%) were utilizing the LNG-IUD in the immediate and delayed groups, respectively (difference 22.2%, 95% CI -0.4% to 44.8%). Intrauterine device expulsion occurred in three subjects (6.8%) and one subject (5.0%) in whom the IUD was placed in the immediate and delayed groups, respectively (p=1.0). No significant adverse events occurred.
CONCLUSION: Significantly more participants had the LNG-IUD placed in the immediate insertion group compared with the delayed insertion group. Given the low risk of complications, immediate post-D&E insertion of the LNG-IUD should be offered, especially for populations that may have difficulty returning for follow-up.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22067762     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  4 in total

1.  Postabortion Contraceptive Use and Continuation When Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Is Free.

Authors:  Vinita Goyal; Caitlin Canfield; Abigail R A Aiken; Amna Dermish; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices.

Authors:  Babasola O Okusanya; Olabisi Oduwole; Emmanuel E Effa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-07-28

3.  Contraception after Abortion and Risk of Repeated Unintended Pregnancy among Health Plan Members.

Authors:  Debbie Postlethwaite; Justine Lee; Maqdooda Merchant; Amy Alabaster; Tina Raine-Bennett
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2018

4.  A Dedicated Postpartum Intrauterine Device Inserter: Pilot Experience and Proof of Concept.

Authors:  Sharad Singh; Vinita Das; Anjoo Agarwal; Rupali Dewan; Pratima Mittal; Renita Bhamrah; Klaira Lerma; Paul D Blumenthal
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2016-03-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.