Literature DB >> 22067716

Effect of hysterectomy with ovarian preservation on ovarian function.

Patricia G Moorman1, Evan R Myers, Joellen M Schildkraut, Edwin S Iversen, Frances Wang, Nicolette Warren.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively estimate the risk for earlier ovarian failure among women undergoing hysterectomy with ovarian preservation, as compared with women of similar age without hysterectomy.
METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted among women aged 30 to 47 years undergoing hysterectomy without bilateral oophorectomy (n=406) and women with intact uteri (n=465). Blood samples and questionnaire data were obtained at baseline and annually for up to 5 years. Hazard ratios (HR) for ovarian failure, defined as follicle-stimulating hormone levels 40 international units/L or higher, were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models.
RESULTS: Ovarian failure occurred among 60 of the women with hysterectomy and 46 of the women in the control group. Women undergoing hysterectomy were at nearly a twofold increased risk for ovarian failure as compared with women with intact uteri (HR 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-2.86). The proportional hazards model further estimated that 14.8% of women with hysterectomies experienced ovarian failure after 4 years of follow-up compared with 8.0% of the women in the control group. Risk for ovarian failure was greater for women who had a unilateral oophorectomy along with their hysterectomy (HR 2.93, 95% CI 1.57-5.49), but also it was significantly increased for women who retained both ovaries (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.14-2.65).
CONCLUSION: Increased risk of earlier ovarian failure is a possible consequence of premenopausal hysterectomy. Although it is unresolved whether it is the surgery itself or the underlying condition leading to hysterectomy that is the cause of earlier ovarian failure, physicians and patients should take into account this possible sequela when considering options for treatment of benign conditions of the uterus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22067716      PMCID: PMC3223258          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318236fd12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  56 in total

1.  Reassessing hysterectomy.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stewart; Lynne T Shuster; Walter A Rocca
Journal:  Minn Med       Date:  2012-03

Review 2.  Management options for women with uterine prolapse interested in uterine preservation.

Authors:  Nathan Kow; Howard B Goldman; Beri Ridgeway
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Hysterectomy and incidence of depressive symptoms in midlife women: the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health.

Authors:  L Wilson; N Pandeya; J Byles; G Mishra
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 6.892

4.  Early menopause and other gynecologic risk indicators for chronic fatigue syndrome in women.

Authors:  Roumiana S Boneva; Jin-Mann S Lin; Elizabeth R Unger
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Hysterectomy Uniquely Impacts Spatial Memory in a Rat Model: A Role for the Nonpregnant Uterus in Cognitive Processes.

Authors:  Stephanie V Koebele; Justin M Palmer; Bryanna Hadder; Ryan Melikian; Carly Fox; Isabel M Strouse; Dale F DeNardo; Christina George; Emily Daunis; Adrianna Nimer; Loretta P Mayer; Cheryl A Dyer; Heather A Bimonte-Nelson
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.736

6.  The Design of a Randomized Trial of Vaginal Surgery for Uterovaginal Prolapse: Vaginal Hysterectomy With Native Tissue Vault Suspension Versus Mesh Hysteropexy Suspension (The Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures Randomized Trial).

Authors:  Charles W Nager; Halina Zyczynski; Rebecca G Rogers; Matthew D Barber; Holly E Richter; Anthony G Visco; Charles R Rardin; Heidi Harvie; Dennis Wallace; Susan F Meikle
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.091

7.  Incidental (Prophylactic) Salpingectomy at Benign Gynecologic Surgery and Cesarean Section: a Survey of Practice in Austria.

Authors:  F L Potz; G Tomasch; S Polterauer; R Laky; C Marth; K Tamussino
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.915

8.  Premenopausal Hysterectomy and Risk of Ovarian Cancer in African-American Women.

Authors:  Lauren C Peres; Anthony J Alberg; Elisa V Bandera; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Melissa Bondy; Michele L Cote; Ellen Funkhouser; Patricia G Moorman; Edward S Peters; Ann G Schwartz; Paul D Terry; Sarah E Abbott; Fabian Camacho; Frances Wang; Joellen M Schildkraut
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 9.  Sex hormones and stroke: Beyond estrogens.

Authors:  Farida Sohrabji; Andre Okoreeh; Aditya Panta
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.587

10.  Hysterectomy with uterosacral suspension or Uphold™ hysteropexy in women with apical prolapse: a parallel cohort study.

Authors:  Mugdha Kulkarni; Natharnia Young; Joseph Lee; Anna Rosamilia
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.