Literature DB >> 22066704

Universal pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for total knee arthroplasty may not be necessary in low-risk populations: a nationwide study in Taiwan.

C-H Lee1, C-L Cheng, C-H Chang, Yea-Huei Kao Yang, L-J Lin, T-C Lin, C-Y Yang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thromboprophylaxis should be universally administered in major orthopedic surgery. However, epidemiology of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following major knee surgery in Asia is scarce.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of thromboprophylaxis and calculate the incidence and risk factors of symptomatic VTE following major knee surgery in Taiwan.
METHODS: We used Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database to retrospectively identify patients (≥45 years) who underwent major knee surgery from 1998 to 2007 and collected the medical records within 3 months after the discharge. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors of symptomatic VTE after the surgery.
RESULTS: We identified 113 844 patients (mean age, 69.0 ± 7.7 years; female, 75.2%) receiving major knee arthroplasties. The mean length of stay was 9.1 ± 3.3 days. The overall pharmacological thromboprophylaxis rate was 2.2%. The 3-month cumulative incidence of procedure-related symptomatic VTE was 0.46% (95% CI, 0.42–0.50%). The median time to the first post-operation VTE was 7 days, with 85.4% occurring within 2 weeks after the discharge.Logistic regression analysis showed that previous VTE, malignancy, heart failure and neurologic disorder with extremity paralysis or pararesis were independent risk factors (P < 0.05) for symptomatic VTE following major knee arthroplasties.
CONCLUSIONS: The thromboprophylaxis rate is low, which may be due to the very low incidence of symptomatic VTE after the surgery in Taiwan. Most symptomatic VTE occurred within 2 weeks after the surgery. Universal thromboprophylaxis for knee arthroplasties may not be necessary in Taiwan, but it should be considered in some high-risk populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22066704     DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04555.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  6 in total

Review 1.  Management of Venous Thromboembolisms: Part I. The Consensus for Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Authors:  Kang-Ling Wang; Pao-Hsien Chu; Cheng-Han Lee; Pei-Ying Pai; Pao-Yen Lin; Kou-Gi Shyu; Wei-Tien Chang; Kuan-Ming Chiu; Chien-Lung Huang; Chung-Yi Lee; Yen-Hung Lin; Chun-Chieh Wang; Hsueh-Wei Yen; Wei-Hsian Yin; Hung-I Yeh; Chern-En Chiang; Shing-Jong Lin; San-Jou Yeh
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 2.  Risk factors for venous thromboembolism of total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of evidences in ten years.

Authors:  Zi-hao Zhang; Bin Shen; Jing Yang; Zong-ke Zhou; Peng-de Kang; Fu-xing Pei
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 3.  Causes of venous thrombosis.

Authors:  F R Rosendaal
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2016-10-04

4.  Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis and its impact on venous thromboembolism following total knee and hip arthroplasty in Korea: A nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Ho-Young Yhim; Juhyun Lee; Ji Yun Lee; Jeong-Ok Lee; Soo-Mee Bang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Reduced cardiac function and risk of venous thromboembolism in Asian countries.

Authors:  Ruiqi Zhu; Liang Tang; Yu Hu
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2017-04-24

6.  Incidence and Related Factors for Low-Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis in Breast Cancer Patients Who Underwent Surgical Resection: What Do We Know and What Should We Care.

Authors:  Liqiang Chen; Qiang Feng; Wenjuan Wang; Lanbo Liu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.