Why the OPLS-AA force field cannot produce the β-hairpin structure of H1 peptide in solution when comparing with the GROMOS 43A1 force field?

The optimal combination of force field and water model is an essential problem that is able to increase molecular dynamics simulation quality for different types of proteins and peptides. In this work, an attempt has been made to explore the problem by studying H1 peptide using four different models based on different force fields, water models and electrostatic schemes. The driving force for H1 peptide conformation transition and the reason why the OPLS-AA force field cannot produce the β-hairpin structure of H1 peptide in solution while the GROMOS 43A1 force field can do were investigated by temperature replica exchange molecular dynamics simulation (T-REMD). The simulation using the GROMOS 43A1 force field preferred to adopt a β-hairpin structure, which was in good agreement with the several other simulations and the experimental evidences. However, the simulation using the OPLS-AA force field has a significant difference from the simulations with the GROMOS 43A1 force field simulation. The results show that the driving force in H1 peptide conformation transition is solvent exposure of its hydrophobic residues. However, the subtle balances between residue-residue interactions and residue-solvent interaction are disrupted by using the OPLS-AA force field, which induced the reduction in the number of residue-residue contact. Similar solvent exposure of the hydrophobic residues is observed for all the conformations sampled using the OPLS-AA force field. For H1 peptide which exhibits large solvent exposure of the hydrophobic residues, the GROMOS 43A1 force field with the SPC water model can provide more accurate results.