Literature DB >> 22065811

1,3-Benzothia-zole-oxalic acid (2/1).

Ashraf Ahmad Ali Abdalsalam, Mohammad T M Al-Dajani, Nornisah Mohamed, Madhukar Hemamalini, Hoong-Kun Fun.   

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C(7)H(5)NS·0.5C(2)H(2)O(4), contains one benzothia-zole mol-ecule and half an oxalic acid mol-ecule, the complete mol-ecule being generated by inversion symmetry. The benzothia-zole mol-ecule is essentially planar, with a maximum deviation of 0.007 (1) Å. In the crystal, the benzothia-zole mol-ecules inter-act with the oxalic acid mol-ecules via O-H⋯N and C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds generating R(2) (2)(8) (× 2) and R(4) (4)(10) motifs, thereby forming supra-molecular ribbons along [101].

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22065811      PMCID: PMC3200845          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811032260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background to the biological activity of benzothia­zoles, see: Bradshaw et al. (1998 ▶); Dögruer et al. (1998 ▶); Dash et al. (1980 ▶); Cox et al. (1982 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H5NS·0.5C2H2O4 M = 180.20 Monoclinic, a = 4.0231 (3) Å b = 26.039 (2) Å c = 8.5605 (6) Å β = 116.064 (3)° V = 805.58 (10) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.35 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.62 × 0.40 × 0.04 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII DUO CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009 ▶) T min = 0.811, T max = 0.985 10970 measured reflections 3204 independent reflections 2417 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.026

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.038 wR(F 2) = 0.114 S = 1.04 3204 reflections 112 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.36 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811032260/tk2778sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811032260/tk2778Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811032260/tk2778Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H5NS·0.5C2H2O4F(000) = 372
Mr = 180.20Dx = 1.486 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 3803 reflections
a = 4.0231 (3) Åθ = 2.8–32.6°
b = 26.039 (2) ŵ = 0.35 mm1
c = 8.5605 (6) ÅT = 296 K
β = 116.064 (3)°Plate, brown
V = 805.58 (10) Å30.62 × 0.40 × 0.04 mm
Z = 4
Bruker APEXII DUO CCD area-detector diffractometer3204 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2417 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.026
φ and ω scansθmax = 33.9°, θmin = 2.8°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009)h = −6→6
Tmin = 0.811, Tmax = 0.985k = −40→40
10970 measured reflectionsl = −13→13
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.114H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.04w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0557P)2 + 0.1124P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3204 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
112 parametersΔρmax = 0.36 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.23 e Å3
Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S11.14317 (9)0.875823 (14)1.21487 (4)0.04461 (11)
N11.0034 (3)0.91965 (4)0.92292 (13)0.0385 (2)
C10.8353 (3)0.84567 (4)1.02665 (14)0.0350 (2)
C20.6466 (4)0.79950 (5)1.00741 (19)0.0448 (3)
H2A0.67630.78001.10370.054*
C30.4144 (4)0.78360 (5)0.8411 (2)0.0493 (3)
H3A0.28810.75270.82520.059*
C40.3652 (4)0.81302 (5)0.69656 (18)0.0468 (3)
H4A0.20350.80170.58610.056*
C50.5516 (4)0.85854 (5)0.71444 (15)0.0412 (3)
H5A0.51870.87800.61760.049*
C60.7919 (3)0.87487 (4)0.88198 (14)0.0329 (2)
C71.1947 (4)0.92418 (5)1.09000 (16)0.0408 (3)
H7A1.35100.95201.13950.049*
O10.7128 (3)0.94803 (4)0.47893 (12)0.0584 (3)
O21.1410 (3)0.98494 (4)0.71853 (11)0.0468 (2)
H1O21.064 (6)0.9617 (8)0.771 (3)0.070*
C80.9467 (3)0.97976 (4)0.55062 (14)0.0363 (2)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.04724 (18)0.0555 (2)0.02518 (14)−0.00784 (13)0.01050 (12)0.00106 (11)
N10.0444 (5)0.0389 (5)0.0286 (4)−0.0058 (4)0.0128 (4)−0.0010 (3)
C10.0333 (5)0.0404 (5)0.0298 (5)0.0001 (4)0.0123 (4)0.0004 (4)
C20.0428 (6)0.0456 (6)0.0446 (6)−0.0034 (5)0.0179 (5)0.0069 (5)
C30.0464 (7)0.0420 (6)0.0565 (8)−0.0098 (5)0.0199 (6)−0.0064 (6)
C40.0442 (6)0.0515 (7)0.0390 (6)−0.0080 (5)0.0131 (5)−0.0136 (5)
C50.0447 (6)0.0465 (6)0.0281 (5)−0.0032 (5)0.0121 (5)−0.0042 (4)
C60.0349 (5)0.0351 (5)0.0275 (5)−0.0006 (4)0.0126 (4)−0.0019 (4)
C70.0442 (6)0.0426 (6)0.0315 (5)−0.0082 (5)0.0129 (5)−0.0038 (4)
O10.0705 (7)0.0600 (6)0.0318 (4)−0.0320 (5)0.0108 (4)−0.0010 (4)
O20.0557 (5)0.0486 (5)0.0255 (4)−0.0169 (4)0.0081 (4)0.0029 (3)
C80.0400 (5)0.0365 (5)0.0265 (5)−0.0049 (4)0.0092 (4)0.0009 (4)
S1—C71.7222 (13)C4—C51.3748 (19)
S1—C11.7300 (12)C4—H4A0.9300
N1—C71.2979 (15)C5—C61.3979 (15)
N1—C61.3944 (14)C5—H5A0.9300
C1—C21.3926 (17)C7—H7A0.9300
C1—C61.3972 (15)O1—C81.1989 (14)
C2—C31.379 (2)O2—C81.3068 (13)
C2—H2A0.9300O2—H1O20.89 (2)
C3—C41.394 (2)C8—C8i1.540 (2)
C3—H3A0.9300
C7—S1—C189.19 (6)C4—C5—C6118.30 (12)
C7—N1—C6110.72 (10)C4—C5—H5A120.9
C2—C1—C6121.04 (11)C6—C5—H5A120.9
C2—C1—S1129.19 (10)N1—C6—C1114.05 (10)
C6—C1—S1109.76 (8)N1—C6—C5125.65 (10)
C3—C2—C1117.92 (12)C1—C6—C5120.30 (11)
C3—C2—H2A121.0N1—C7—S1116.28 (9)
C1—C2—H2A121.0N1—C7—H7A121.9
C2—C3—C4121.26 (12)S1—C7—H7A121.9
C2—C3—H3A119.4C8—O2—H1O2108.3 (15)
C4—C3—H3A119.4O1—C8—O2126.13 (11)
C5—C4—C3121.16 (12)O1—C8—C8i122.24 (12)
C5—C4—H4A119.4O2—C8—C8i111.63 (12)
C3—C4—H4A119.4
C7—S1—C1—C2179.27 (13)C2—C1—C6—N1−179.17 (11)
C7—S1—C1—C6−0.42 (9)S1—C1—C6—N10.55 (13)
C6—C1—C2—C3−0.3 (2)C2—C1—C6—C51.12 (18)
S1—C1—C2—C3−179.91 (11)S1—C1—C6—C5−179.16 (9)
C1—C2—C3—C4−0.9 (2)C4—C5—C6—N1179.48 (12)
C2—C3—C4—C51.1 (2)C4—C5—C6—C1−0.85 (19)
C3—C4—C5—C6−0.3 (2)C6—N1—C7—S10.05 (15)
C7—N1—C6—C1−0.39 (15)C1—S1—C7—N10.22 (11)
C7—N1—C6—C5179.30 (12)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H1O2···N10.89 (2)1.80 (2)2.6663 (15)166 (2)
C5—H5A···O10.932.483.3263 (17)151
C7—H7A···O2ii0.932.483.4029 (18)170
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O2—H1O2⋯N10.89 (2)1.80 (2)2.6663 (15)166 (2)
C5—H5A⋯O10.932.483.3263 (17)151
C7—H7A⋯O2i0.932.483.4029 (18)170

Symmetry code: (i) .

  5 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Synthesis and biological activity of benzothiazolo- and benzoxazolo[3,2-a]quinolinium salts.

Authors:  O Cox; H Jackson; V A Vargas; A Báez; J I Colón; B C González; M de León
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory activity of some (2-benzoxazolone-3-yl and 2-benzothiazolone-3-yl)acetic acid derivatives.

Authors:  D S Doğruer; S Unlü; M F Sahin; E Yeşilada
Journal:  Farmaco       Date:  1998-01

4.  2-(4-Aminophenyl)benzothiazoles: novel agents with selective profiles of in vitro anti-tumour activity.

Authors:  T D Bradshaw; S Wrigley; D F Shi; R J Schultz; K D Paull; M F Stevens
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.