Literature DB >> 22065796

A prospective study of three diagnostic sonographic methods in differentiation between benign and malignant salivary gland tumours.

S M El-Khateeb1, A E Abou-Khalaf, M M Farid, M A Nassef.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of three diagnostic sonographic methods, greyscale sonography (GSS), colour Doppler sonography (CDS) and spectral Doppler (SPD), in differentiating between benign and malignant salivary gland (SG) tumours.
METHODS: 44 patients with SG masses were examined using GSS, CDS and SPD. The morphological features of each tumour were evaluated using GSS, the distribution and number of detected blood vessels were assessed using CDS, and peak systolic velocity (PSV), resistive index (RI) and pulsatility index (PI) were measured on SPD. All cases underwent excisional biopsy and a definite tissue diagnosis was obtained.
RESULTS: Histopathological examination revealed that 28 of the 44 tumours were benign and 16 were malignant. GSS showed that malignant SG tumours had a significantly higher incidence of ill-defined borders and lymph node involvement than benign tumours, but there was no significant difference between benign and malignant SG tumours regarding echogenicity, homogeneity or sonographic shape. CDS demonstrated malignant tumours with significantly higher vascularity and a scattered distribution. Using SPD, malignant tumours had significantly higher PSV, RI and PI compared with benign tumours.
CONCLUSION: RI values above 0.7, PI values above 1.2, PSV values above 44.3 cm s(-1), ill-defined borders, lymph node involvement, Grade 2 or 3 vascularity and hilar distribution of blood vessels should alert the clinician to suspect a malignant SG tumour. After consensus on the threshold values of PSV, RI and PI in differentiating benign from malignant SG tumours, these numbers should be incorporated into the software of ultrasound machines to guide the sonographer in his or her analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22065796      PMCID: PMC3528155          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/18407834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  22 in total

1.  A comparative study of sonographic and histopathologic findings of tumorous lesions in the parotid gland.

Authors:  M Shimizu; J Ussmüller; J Hartwein; K Donath
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1999-12

Review 2.  Major salivary gland imaging.

Authors:  D M Yousem; M A Kraut; A A Chalian
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Sonography of neck lymph nodes. Part I: normal lymph nodes.

Authors:  M Ying; A Ahuja
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Sonography and scintigraphy in the diagnosis of diseases of the major salivary glands.

Authors:  R Schemelzeisen; H Milbradt; P Reimer; P Gratz; C Wittekind
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  [Color-coded duplex sonography of the parotid gland in Sjögren's syndrome].

Authors:  E Steiner; W Graninger; J Hitzelhammer; A Lakits; P Petera; P Franz; N Gritzmann
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1994-04

6.  Multi-centre clinical study evaluating the efficacy of SonoVue (BR1), a new ultrasound contrast agent in Doppler investigation of focal hepatic lesions.

Authors:  E Leen; W J Angerson; S Yarmenitis; G Bongartz; M Blomley; A Del Maschio; V Summaria; G Maresca; C Pezzoli; J B Llull
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Salivary gland tumours: is colour Doppler imaging of added value in their preoperative assessment?

Authors:  B A Ajayi; N D Pugh; G Carolan; J P Woodcock
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.424

8.  Tumor vascularization: assessment with duplex sonography.

Authors:  W Dock; F Grabenwöger; V Metz; K Eibenberger; M T Farrés
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Color Doppler sonography of salivary glands.

Authors:  C Martinoli; L E Derchi; L Solbiati; G Rizzatto; E Silvestri; M Giannoni
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Distinction between benign and malignant causes of cervical, axillary, and inguinal lymphadenopathy: value of Doppler spectral waveform analysis.

Authors:  M Y Choi; J W Lee; K J Jang
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Review on the applications of ultrasonography in dentomaxillofacial region.

Authors:  Şehrazat Evirgen; Kıvanç Kamburoğlu
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-28

2.  Characteristic power Doppler sonographic images of tumorous and non-tumorous buccal space lesions.

Authors:  I Ogura; T Kaneda; Y Sasaki; K Sekiya; S Tokunaga
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Pictorial essay: Salivary gland imaging.

Authors:  Rajul Rastogi; Sumeet Bhargava; Govindarajan Janardan Mallarajapatna; Sudhir Kumar Singh
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2012-10

Review 4.  Standards for the assessment of salivary glands - an update.

Authors:  Piotr Zajkowski; Aleksandra Ochal-Choińska
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2016-06-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.