Literature DB >> 22064870

1,1'-(Propane-1,3-di-yl)bis-(3-phenyl-urea).

Pramod Pansuriya1, Hariska Naidu, Holger B Friedrich, Glenn E M Maguire.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(17)H(20)N(4)O(2), has crystallographic inversion symmetry. In the crystal structure, inter-molecular hydrogen bonding between adjacent urea groups gives rise to infinite polymeric chains diagonally across the bc plane. With a centroid-centroid distance of 3.295 (2) Å, π-π stacking is present in the crystal along the same plane.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22064870      PMCID: PMC3201411          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811035343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For applications of ureas, see: Park et al. (2011 ▶); Ahmed et al. (2011 ▶); Sharma et al. (2010 ▶); Vos et al. (2010 ▶); Dawn et al. (2011 ▶). For related structures, see: Koevoets et al. (2005 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C17H20N4O2 M = 312.37 Monoclinic, a = 33.811 (7) Å b = 4.598 (1) Å c = 9.891 (2) Å β = 98.957 (4)° V = 1518.9 (6) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.09 mm−1 T = 173 K 0.50 × 0.21 × 0.02 mm

Data collection

Bruker Kappa DUO APEXII diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (TWINABS; Sheldrick, 2007 ▶)T min = 0.955, T max = 0.998 1930 measured reflections 1930 independent reflections 1811 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.042

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.033 wR(F 2) = 0.092 S = 1.05 1930 reflections 114 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.27 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.19 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2006 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2006 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811035343/hg5067sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811035343/hg5067Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811035343/hg5067Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C17H20N4O2F(000) = 664
Mr = 312.37Dx = 1.366 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMelting point: 504 K
Hall symbol: -C 2ycMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 33.811 (7) ÅCell parameters from 1930 reflections
b = 4.598 (1) Åθ = 2.4–28.5°
c = 9.891 (2) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
β = 98.957 (4)°T = 173 K
V = 1518.9 (6) Å3Plate, colourless
Z = 40.50 × 0.21 × 0.02 mm
Bruker Kappa DUO APEXII diffractometer1930 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1811 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.042
0.5° φ scans and ω scansθmax = 28.5°, θmin = 2.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (TWINABS; Sheldrick, 2007)h = −44→44
Tmin = 0.955, Tmax = 0.998k = 0→6
1930 measured reflectionsl = 0→13
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.092H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.05w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0565P)2 + 0.4485P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1930 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
114 parametersΔρmax = 0.27 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.19 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
O10.42150 (2)0.94129 (16)0.45600 (10)0.0258 (2)
N10.39232 (3)0.5132 (2)0.37683 (12)0.0243 (2)
H1N0.3915 (4)0.335 (4)0.3917 (18)0.035 (4)*
N20.44667 (3)0.5183 (2)0.54828 (11)0.0228 (2)
H2N0.4448 (5)0.331 (4)0.5513 (17)0.039 (5)*
C10.36029 (3)0.6418 (2)0.28699 (11)0.0204 (2)
C20.36739 (3)0.8527 (3)0.19350 (13)0.0243 (2)
H20.39400.91500.18970.029*
C30.33567 (4)0.9726 (3)0.10557 (14)0.0285 (3)
H30.34051.11880.04230.034*
C40.29688 (4)0.8801 (3)0.10954 (14)0.0297 (3)
H40.27520.96310.04940.036*
C50.28992 (4)0.6679 (3)0.20069 (14)0.0303 (3)
H50.26330.60250.20230.036*
C60.32140 (4)0.5478 (3)0.29065 (14)0.0267 (3)
H60.31640.40260.35410.032*
C70.42011 (3)0.6716 (2)0.46010 (12)0.0194 (2)
C80.47434 (3)0.6748 (2)0.64875 (13)0.0247 (3)
H8A0.45900.80790.69980.030*
H8B0.49210.79510.60070.030*
C90.50000.4779 (3)0.75000.0195 (3)
H9B0.48290.35230.79800.023*0.50
H9A0.51710.35230.70200.023*0.50
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0313 (4)0.0117 (4)0.0306 (4)0.0004 (3)−0.0070 (4)−0.0002 (3)
N10.0283 (4)0.0126 (4)0.0281 (5)−0.0010 (4)−0.0078 (4)0.0011 (4)
N20.0262 (4)0.0130 (4)0.0260 (5)−0.0007 (3)−0.0057 (4)0.0003 (4)
C10.0240 (5)0.0158 (5)0.0195 (5)0.0011 (4)−0.0025 (4)−0.0027 (4)
C20.0259 (5)0.0235 (5)0.0228 (6)−0.0003 (4)0.0018 (4)0.0003 (5)
C30.0366 (6)0.0261 (6)0.0215 (5)0.0016 (5)0.0008 (5)0.0045 (5)
C40.0295 (6)0.0282 (6)0.0277 (6)0.0056 (5)−0.0073 (5)−0.0024 (5)
C50.0239 (5)0.0311 (6)0.0343 (7)−0.0022 (4)−0.0010 (5)−0.0025 (5)
C60.0291 (5)0.0237 (5)0.0256 (6)−0.0042 (4)−0.0005 (5)0.0014 (5)
C70.0225 (5)0.0149 (4)0.0201 (5)0.0004 (4)0.0006 (4)−0.0007 (4)
C80.0273 (5)0.0148 (5)0.0280 (6)−0.0005 (4)−0.0086 (5)−0.0002 (4)
C90.0205 (6)0.0147 (6)0.0216 (7)0.000−0.0023 (6)0.000
O1—C71.2416 (13)C3—H30.9500
N1—C71.3607 (14)C4—C51.373 (2)
N1—C11.4187 (14)C4—H40.9500
N1—H1N0.833 (19)C5—C61.3909 (17)
N2—C71.3492 (14)C5—H50.9500
N2—C81.4463 (14)C6—H60.9500
N2—H2N0.862 (19)C8—C91.5180 (14)
C1—C21.3866 (17)C8—H8A0.9900
C1—C61.3898 (17)C8—H8B0.9900
C2—C31.3857 (16)C9—C8i1.5180 (14)
C2—H20.9500C9—H9B0.9900
C3—C41.3850 (19)C9—H9A0.9900
C7—N1—C1122.95 (9)C6—C5—H5119.7
C7—N1—H1N117.3 (11)C1—C6—C5119.51 (13)
C1—N1—H1N118.5 (11)C1—C6—H6120.2
C7—N2—C8118.57 (9)C5—C6—H6120.2
C7—N2—H2N119.8 (11)O1—C7—N2121.22 (10)
C8—N2—H2N121.1 (11)O1—C7—N1122.76 (10)
C2—C1—C6119.85 (11)N2—C7—N1116.02 (9)
C2—C1—N1120.98 (11)N2—C8—C9113.49 (9)
C6—C1—N1119.15 (11)N2—C8—H8A108.9
C3—C2—C1119.95 (11)C9—C8—H8A108.9
C3—C2—H2120.0N2—C8—H8B108.9
C1—C2—H2120.0C9—C8—H8B108.9
C4—C3—C2120.25 (13)H8A—C8—H8B107.7
C4—C3—H3119.9C8i—C9—C8106.78 (12)
C2—C3—H3119.9C8i—C9—H9B110.4
C5—C4—C3119.78 (11)C8—C9—H9B110.4
C5—C4—H4120.1C8i—C9—H9A110.4
C3—C4—H4120.1C8—C9—H9A110.4
C4—C5—C6120.65 (12)H9B—C9—H9A108.6
C4—C5—H5119.7
C7—N1—C1—C253.70 (18)N1—C1—C6—C5−178.50 (11)
C7—N1—C1—C6−128.16 (14)C4—C5—C6—C1−0.7 (2)
C6—C1—C2—C31.05 (18)C8—N2—C7—O16.54 (18)
N1—C1—C2—C3179.18 (11)C8—N2—C7—N1−173.82 (12)
C1—C2—C3—C4−0.77 (19)C1—N1—C7—O1−6.0 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C5−0.2 (2)C1—N1—C7—N2174.39 (12)
C3—C4—C5—C61.0 (2)C7—N2—C8—C9174.67 (10)
C2—C1—C6—C5−0.34 (19)N2—C8—C9—C8i−177.37 (13)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1N···O1ii0.834 (18)2.124 (18)2.8742 (14)149.7 (13)
N2—H2N···O1ii0.864 (18)2.119 (18)2.8904 (14)148.4 (15)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1N⋯O1i0.834 (18)2.124 (18)2.8742 (14)149.7 (13)
N2—H2N⋯O1i0.864 (18)2.119 (18)2.8904 (14)148.4 (15)

Symmetry code: (i) .

  7 in total

1.  Kinetic switching between two modes of bisurea surfactant self-assembly.

Authors:  Matthijn R J Vos; Philippe E L G Leclère; Hugo Meekes; Elias Vlieg; Roeland J M Nolte; Nico A J M Sommerdijk
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Molecular recognition in a thermoplastic elastomer.

Authors:  Rolf A Koevoets; Ron M Versteegen; Huub Kooijman; Anthony L Spek; Rint P Sijbesma; E W Meijer
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  cyclo-Bis(urea-3,6-dichlorocarbazole) as a chromogenic and fluorogenic receptor for anions and a selective sensor of zinc and copper cations.

Authors:  Nisar Ahmed; Inacrist Geronimo; In-Chul Hwang; N Jiten Singh; Kwang S Kim
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 5.236

5.  (Bis)urea and (bis)thiourea inhibitors of lysine-specific demethylase 1 as epigenetic modulators.

Authors:  Shiv K Sharma; Yu Wu; Nora Steinbergs; Michael L Crowley; Allison S Hanson; Robert A Casero; Patrick M Woster
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Self-assembly approach toward chiral bimetallic catalysts: bis-urea-functionalized (salen)cobalt complexes for the hydrolytic kinetic resolution of epoxides.

Authors:  Jongwoo Park; Kai Lang; Khalil A Abboud; Sukwon Hong
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 5.236

7.  Self-assembled phenylethynylene bis-urea macrocycles facilitate the selective photodimerization of coumarin.

Authors:  Sandipan Dawn; Mahender B Dewal; David Sobransingh; Monissa C Paderes; Arief C Wibowo; Mark D Smith; Jeanette A Krause; Perry J Pellechia; Linda S Shimizu
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 15.419

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  1,1'-(Ethane-1,2-di-yl)bis-(3-phenyl-thio-urea).

Authors:  Pramod B Pansuriya; Holger B Friedrich; Glenn E M Maguire
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-10-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.