Literature DB >> 22064044

Selective voting in convex-hull ensembles improves classification accuracy.

Ralph L Kodell1, Chuanlei Zhang, Eric R Siegel, Radhakrishnan Nagarajan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Classification algorithms can be used to predict risks and responses of patients based on genomic and other high-dimensional data. While there is optimism for using these algorithms to improve the treatment of diseases, they have yet to demonstrate sufficient predictive ability for routine clinical practice. They generally classify all patients according to the same criteria, under an implicit assumption of population homogeneity. The objective here is to allow for population heterogeneity, possibly unrecognized, in order to increase classification accuracy and further the goal of tailoring therapies on an individualized basis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A new selective-voting algorithm is developed in the context of a classifier ensemble of two-dimensional convex hulls of positive and negative training samples. Individual classifiers in the ensemble are allowed to vote on test samples only if those samples are located within or behind pruned convex hulls of training samples that define the classifiers.
RESULTS: Validation of the new algorithm's increased accuracy is carried out using two publicly available datasets having cancer as the outcome variable and expression levels of thousands of genes as predictors. Selective voting leads to statistically significant increases in accuracy from 86.0% to 89.8% (p<0.001) and 63.2% to 67.8% (p<0.003) compared to the original algorithm.
CONCLUSION: Selective voting by members of convex-hull classifier ensembles significantly increases classification accuracy compared to one-size-fits-all approaches. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22064044      PMCID: PMC3666100          DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2011.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Intell Med        ISSN: 0933-3657            Impact factor:   5.326


  10 in total

1.  A model-free ensemble method for class prediction with application to biomedical decision making.

Authors:  Ralph L Kodell; Bruce A Pearce; Songjoon Baek; Hojin Moon; Hongshik Ahn; John F Young; James J Chen
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 5.326

2.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura J van 't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Augustinus A M Hart; Mao Mao; Hans L Peterse; Karin van der Kooy; Matthew J Marton; Anke T Witteveen; George J Schreiber; Ron M Kerkhoven; Chris Roberts; Peter S Linsley; René Bernards; Stephen H Friend
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Broad patterns of gene expression revealed by clustering analysis of tumor and normal colon tissues probed by oligonucleotide arrays.

Authors:  U Alon; N Barkai; D A Notterman; K Gish; S Ybarra; D Mack; A J Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Selection bias in gene extraction on the basis of microarray gene-expression data.

Authors:  Christophe Ambroise; Geoffrey J McLachlan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Idiosyncratic drug hepatotoxicity.

Authors:  Neil Kaplowitz
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  Diagnosis of multiple cancer types by shrunken centroids of gene expression.

Authors:  Robert Tibshirani; Trevor Hastie; Balasubramanian Narasimhan; Gilbert Chu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Ensemble methods for classification of patients for personalized medicine with high-dimensional data.

Authors:  Hojin Moon; Hongshik Ahn; Ralph L Kodell; Songjoon Baek; Chien-Ju Lin; James J Chen
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 8.  Diclofenac-induced liver injury: a paradigm of idiosyncratic drug toxicity.

Authors:  Urs A Boelsterli
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 4.219

9.  A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer.

Authors:  Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Laura J van't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Augustinus A M Hart; Dorien W Voskuil; George J Schreiber; Johannes L Peterse; Chris Roberts; Matthew J Marton; Mark Parrish; Douwe Atsma; Anke Witteveen; Annuska Glas; Leonie Delahaye; Tony van der Velde; Harry Bartelink; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Emiel T Rutgers; Stephen H Friend; René Bernards
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Classification methods for the development of genomic signatures from high-dimensional data.

Authors:  Hojin Moon; Hongshik Ahn; Ralph L Kodell; Chien-Ju Lin; Songjoon Baek; James J Chen
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.583

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Subpopulation-specific confidence designation for more informative biomedical classification.

Authors:  Chuanlei Zhang; Ralph L Kodell
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 5.326

2.  Patient-Specific Variations in Biomarkers across Gingivitis and Periodontitis.

Authors:  Radhakrishnan Nagarajan; Craig S Miller; Dolph Dawson; Mohanad Al-Sabbagh; Jeffrey L Ebersole
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Novel Use of Proteomic Profiles in a Convex-Hull Ensemble Classifier to Predict Gynecological Cancer Patients' Susceptibility to Gastrointestinal Mucositis as Side Effect of Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Ralph L Kodell; Randy S Haun; Eric R Siegel; Chuanlei Zhang; Angela B Trammel; Martin Hauer-Jensen; Alexander F Burnett
Journal:  J Proteomics Bioinform       Date:  2015-06-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.