Literature DB >> 22063416

The relationship between different pork carcass lean yield definitions and the market carcass value.

M Marcoux1, C Pomar, L Faucitano, C Brodeur.   

Abstract

Cutout and dissection data from 265 carcasses were used to study the impact of the lean yield definition on their ability to discriminate lean carcasses from fat carcasses. The same data were used to evaluate the relationship between the various definitions of lean yield, such as the lean yield predicted by the Destron optical probe (LYDESTRON), the saleable meat yield (SMY), the Canadian lean yield (LY2000) and the lean meat percentage (TVM), and the market carcass value. Based on the highest number of carcasses assigned to the extreme grades (leaner and fatter), the TVM had the greatest discriminating capability based on carcass leanness. The correlation coefficients obtained between market carcass value and LYDESTRON, SMY, LY2000 and TVM were 0.14, 0.54, 0.36 and 0.23, respectively. These weak correlations demonstrate that lean yield alone does not adequately explain the variation in market value between carcasses. Lean yield therefore cannot be used to estimate market value independently of the definition used.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 22063416     DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Meat Sci        ISSN: 0309-1740            Impact factor:   5.209


  4 in total

1.  Characteristics of pork belly consumption in South Korea and their health implication.

Authors:  Jee-Hwan Choe; Han-Sul Yang; Sang-Hoon Lee; Gwang-Woong Go
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-09

2.  Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Pork Belly Components in Yorkshire Pigs.

Authors:  H S Kang; B M Lopez; T H Kim; H S Kim; S H Kim; K C Nam; K S Seo
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.509

3.  The impact of feeding diets of high or low energy concentration on carcass measurements and the weight of primal and subprimal lean cuts.

Authors:  A P Schinckel; M E Einstein; S Jungst; J O Matthews; B Fields; C Booher; T Dreadin; C Fralick; S Tabor; A Sosnicki; E Wilson; R D Boyd
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Framework for life cycle assessment of livestock production systems to account for the nutritional quality of final products.

Authors:  Graham A McAuliffe; Taro Takahashi; Michael R F Lee
Journal:  Food Energy Secur       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.109

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.