Comparison of CO(2) stunning with manual electrical stunning (50 Hz) of pigs on carcass and meat quality.

The effects of carbon dioxide stunning on carcass and pork quality attributes were compared with the effects of manual electrical stunning using either head-only or head-to-brisket electrodes. A total of 30 Large White×Landrace boars (homozygous dominant for the halothane gene) were randomly allocated immediately prior to slaughter to one of three stunning treatments: carbon dioxide (90% CO(2)), head only (HO; 1.3 A for 4 s at a frequency of 50 Hz) or head to brisket (HBR; 1.3 A for 4 s at a frequency of 50 Hz) electrical stunning. The pH of the M. longissimus thoracis (LT) muscle measured at two sites [between the fifth and sixth thoracic vertebrae (Site 1) and the last thoracic rib (Site 2)] at 40 min post-slaughter was lower (P<0.001) in HBR stunned pigs compared with both CO(2) and HO stunned pigs. No differences in ultimate pH of the LT at either measurement site were found due to stunning method. However, a faster (P<0.05) relative rate of pH decline was found in the LT at Site 1 from HBR stunned pigs compared with CO(2) stunned pigs. No difference in the relative rate of muscle pH decline (P>0.05) between stunning methods was found in the LT muscle at Site 2. Pork from HBR stunned pigs was paler (P<0.05) and had a higher (P<0.001) percentage drip loss compared with pork from HO and CO(2) stunned pigs. LT muscles from HBR stunned pigs had lower (P<0.001) WB shear force values compared with pork from HO stunned pigs (6.57 vs. 8.12 kg, S.E.D. 0.49). Carcass quality was improved by CO(2) stunning, with less (P<0.05) ecchymosis-affected pork trimmed from shoulder primals compared with electrically stunned pigs. These results indicate that manual electrical stunning of pigs using HO tongs and CO(2) stunning reduced percentage drip loss, reduced muscle lightness and reduced the rate of muscle pH decline compared with pigs manually electrically stunned using HBR tongs.