Literature DB >> 22062373

The effect of increasing carcass weight of finishing boars and gilts on joint composition and meat quality.

V E Beattie1, R N Weatherup, B W Moss, N Walker.   

Abstract

Two hundred and eighty-eight crossbred (3/4 Landrace × 1/4 Large White) pigs, comprising equal numbers of boars and gilts, were housed in single sex groups from 50 kg liveweight to slaughter at liveweights of 92, 105, 118 and 131 kg (carcass weights of 70, 80, 90 and 100 kg). Sample joints from the left longissimus dorsi muscle were obtained at slaughter for dissection and meat quality assessment. As carcass weight increased there were significant (p<0.001) increases in eye muscle area and subcutaneous fat content. Lean content decreased (p<0.001) with increasing carcass weight while intermuscular fat content was not affected. There was a significant interaction between carcass weight and gender with % drip loss in pork from gilts at 100 kg having a higher drip loss than boars and gilts at all other weights. There were small but significant (p<0.01) reductions in ultimate pH with increasing carcass weight. Cooking loss was also reduced (p<0.001) at the heavier weights. There was no effect of carcass weight on shear force or on intramuscular fat. Dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP) contents of m. L. dorsi increased (p<0.001) at heavier weights while sarcomere length decreased (p=0.001). Compared with boars, gilts had greater eye muscle area (p<0.05), more subcutaneous fat (p<0.001). Meat from gilts in comparison with boars had higher % DM and % CP contents (p<0.001), higher intramuscular fat content and shear force (p<0.05). It is concluded that meat quality may be improved when carcass weight is increased from 70 to 100 kg. ©

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 22062373     DOI: 10.1016/s0309-1740(98)00169-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Meat Sci        ISSN: 0309-1740            Impact factor:   5.209


  5 in total

1.  Effect of hot carcass weight on loin, ham, and belly quality from pigs sourced from a commercial processing facility,.

Authors:  B N Harsh; E K Arkfeld; D A Mohrhauser; D A King; T L Wheeler; A C Dilger; S D Shackelford; D D Boler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Description, evaluation, and validation of the Teagasc Pig Production Model1.

Authors:  Julia Adriana Calderón Díaz; Laurence Shalloo; Jarkko K Niemi; Ilias Kyriazakis; Michael McKeon; Gerard McCutcheon; Alan Bohan; Edgar G Manzanilla
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  A canonical correlation analysis of the association between carcass and ham traits in pigs used to produce dry-cured ham.

Authors:  Henrique T Ventura; Paulo S Lopes; José V Peloso; Simone E F Guimarães; Antonio Policarpo S Carneiro; Paulo L S Carneiro
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 1.771

4.  Meat Quality of Crossbred Porkers without the Gene RYR1 (T) Depending on Slaughter Weight.

Authors:  Grażyna Czyżak-Runowska; Janusz Wojtczak; Andrzej Łyczyński; Jacek Wójtowski; Maria Markiewicz-Kęszycka; Daniel Stanisławski; Marek Babicz
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.509

5.  Influence of an increased content of pea and yellow lupin protein in the diet of pigs on meat quality.

Authors:  Aleksandra Cebulska; Hanna Jankowiak; Eva Weisbauerová; Pavel Nevrkla
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2021-12-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.