Literature DB >> 22062341

Why do car drivers fail to give way to motorcycles at t-junctions?

David Crundall1, Elizabeth Crundall, David Clarke, Amit Shahar.   

Abstract

Studies of accident statistics suggest that motorcyclists are particularly vulnerable to collisions with other vehicles which pull out of side roads onto a main carriageway, failing to give way to the approaching motorcycle. Why might this happen? The typical response of the car driver is that they looked in the appropriate direction but simply failed to see the motorcycle. To assess the visual skills of drivers in such scenarios we compared the behaviour of novice and experienced drivers to a group of dual drivers (with both car and motorcycle experience). Participants watched a series of video clips, displayed across three screens, depicting the approach to various t-junctions. On reaching the junction, participants had to decide when it was safe to pull out. Responses and eye movements were measured. The results confirmed that dual drivers had the safest responses at junctions, especially in the presence of conflicting motorcycles. On a range of visual measures both novice and experienced drivers appeared inferior to dual drivers, though for potentially different reasons. There were however no differences in the time it took all drivers to first fixate approaching motorcycles. Instead the differences appeared to be due to the amount of time spent looking at the approaching motorcycle. The experienced drivers had shorter gazes on motorcycles than cars, suggesting that they either process less salient motorcycles faster than cars, or that they terminated the gaze prematurely perhaps because they did not realise they were fixating a motorcycle. We argue that this is potential evidence for an oculomotor basis for Look But Fail To See errors. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 22062341     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  7 in total

Review 1.  Normal blindness: when we Look But Fail To See.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Anna Kosovicheva; Benjamin Wolfe
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 24.482

2.  Negotiating left-hand and right-hand bends: a motorcycle simulator study to investigate experiential and behaviour differences across rider groups.

Authors:  Elizabeth Crundall; David Crundall; Alex W Stedmon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The effects of age and cognitive load on peripheral-detection performance.

Authors:  Steven W Savage; Lauren P Spano; Alex R Bowers
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The illusion of absence: how a common feature of magic shows can explain a class of road accidents.

Authors:  Vebjørn Ekroll; Mats Svalebjørg; Angelo Pirrone; Gisela Böhm; Sebastian Jentschke; Rob van Lier; Johan Wagemans; Alena Høye
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-03-24

5.  Analysis of hazard perception characteristics based on driving behavior considering overt and covert hazard scenarios.

Authors:  Tianzheng Wei; Tong Zhu; Chenxin Li; Haoxue Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Drivers' Visual Search Behavior Toward Vulnerable Road Users at Junctions as a Function of Cycling Experience.

Authors:  Chloe Jade Robbins; Peter Chapman
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.888

7.  Thinking aloud on the road: Thematic differences in the experiences of drivers, cyclists, and motorcyclists.

Authors:  Rich C McIlroy; Katherine L Plant; Neville A Stanton
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2021-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.