Literature DB >> 22062136

Differential protection of neuromuscular sensory and motor axons and their endings in Wld(S) mutant mice.

O R O Oyebode1, R Hartley, J Singhota, D Thomson, R R Ribchester.   

Abstract

Orthograde Wallerian degeneration normally brings about fragmentation of peripheral nerve axons and their sensory or motor endings within 24-48 h in mice. However, neuronal expression of the chimaeric, Wld(S) gene mutation extends survival of functioning axons and their distal endings for up to 3 weeks after nerve section. Here we studied the pattern and rate of degeneration of sensory axons and their annulospiral endings in deep lumbrical muscles of Wld(S) mice, and compared these with motor axons and their terminals, using neurone-specific transgenic expression of the fluorescent proteins yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) or cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) as morphological reporters. Surprisingly, sensory endings were preserved for up to 20 days, at least twice as long as the most resilient motor nerve terminals. Protection of sensory endings and axons was also much less sensitive to Wld(S) gene-copy number or age than motor axons and their endings. Protection of γ-motor axons and their terminals innervating the juxtaequatorial and polar regions of the spindles was less than sensory axons but greater than α-motor axons. The differences between sensory and motor axon protection persisted in electrically silent, organotypic nerve-explant cultures suggesting that residual axonal activity does not contribute to the sensory-motor axon differences in vivo. Quantitative, Wld(S)-specific immunostaining of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurones and motor neurones in homozygous Wld(S) mice suggested that the nuclei of large DRG neurones contain about 2.4 times as much Wld(S) protein as motor neurones. By contrast, nuclear fluorescence of DRG neurones in homozygotes was only 1.5 times brighter than in heterozygotes stained under identical conditions. Thus, differences in axonal or synaptic protection within the same Wld(S) mouse may most simply be explained by differences in expression level of Wld(S) protein between neurones. Mimicry of Wld(S)-induced protection may also have applications in treatment of neurotoxicity or peripheral neuropathies in which the integrity of sensory endings may be especially implicated.
Copyright © 2011 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22062136     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  7 in total

1.  Stem Cell-Derived Immature Human Dorsal Root Ganglia Neurons to Identify Peripheral Neurotoxicants.

Authors:  Lisa Hoelting; Stefanie Klima; Christiaan Karreman; Marianna Grinberg; Johannes Meisig; Margit Henry; Tamara Rotshteyn; Jörg Rahnenführer; Nils Blüthgen; Agapios Sachinidis; Tanja Waldmann; Marcel Leist
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 6.940

2.  Activity-dependent degeneration of axotomized neuromuscular synapses in Wld S mice.

Authors:  R Brown; A Hynes-Allen; A J Swan; K N Dissanayake; T H Gillingwater; R R Ribchester
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 3.  Some reminiscences on studies of age-dependent and activity-dependent degeneration of sensory and motor endings in mammalian skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Richard R Ribchester
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Altered mitochondrial bioenergetics are responsible for the delay in Wallerian degeneration observed in neonatal mice.

Authors:  Rachel A Kline; Kosala N Dissanayake; Maica Llavero Hurtado; Nicolás W Martínez; Alexander Ahl; Alannah J Mole; Douglas J Lamont; Felipe A Court; Richard R Ribchester; Thomas M Wishart; Lyndsay M Murray
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 5.996

5.  Confocal Endomicroscopy of Neuromuscular Junctions Stained with Physiologically Inert Protein Fragments of Tetanus Toxin.

Authors:  Cornelia Roesl; Elizabeth R Evans; Kosala N Dissanayake; Veronika Boczonadi; Ross A Jones; Graeme R Jordan; Leire Ledahawsky; Guy C C Allen; Molly Scott; Alanna Thomson; Thomas M Wishart; David I Hughes; Richard J Mead; Clifford C Shone; Clarke R Slater; Thomas H Gillingwater; Paul A Skehel; Richard R Ribchester
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-10-12

6.  Sarm1 Deletion, but Not WldS, Confers Lifelong Rescue in a Mouse Model of Severe Axonopathy.

Authors:  Jonathan Gilley; Richard R Ribchester; Michael P Coleman
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  Neuroprotection by WldS depends on retinal ganglion cell type and age in glaucoma.

Authors:  Michael L Risner; Silvia Pasini; Nolan R McGrady; Karis B D'Alessandro; Vincent Yao; Melissa L Cooper; David J Calkins
Journal:  Mol Neurodegener       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 14.195

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.