Literature DB >> 22060578

The effects of non-vacuum packaging systems on drip loss from chilled beef.

S R Payne1, C J Durham, S M Scott, C E Devine.   

Abstract

This study investigated drip loss in chilled beef (hot-boned m. longissimus lumborum (LL)) under conventional packaging systems, in which a vacuum is applied, and non-vacuum packaging systems. The use of vacuum during the packaging process (vacuum packaging, CO(2) atmosphere packaging) was associated with increased drip. Drip was lower in heat-shrunk vacuum packaging than in non-shrunk vacuum packaging. A slow vacuum onset had no effect on drip formation, or may have increased it. The extent of pressure reduction (vacuum; range 0-1 atm) did not significantly affect drip formation, although the standard vacuum pressure (0 atm) tended to cause more drip loss than higher pressures. The three non-vacuum anaerobic packaging systems tested were: flushed with carbon dioxide without the pressure being reduced below atmospheric (Flush), or the same system with no CO(2) flush but a proprietary oxygen absorber added (Scavenger), or a combination of both (Flush/Scavenger). Storage was at -1.5 °C for up to 20 weeks. The Flush and Flush/Scavenger systems had considerably lower drip loss than the CAP standard system (6.4%, 6.5%, and 9.1% respectively); the Scavenger system had the lowest drip loss (5.2%). Drip losses generally increased with storage period, irrespective of packaging system. All non-vacuum packaging systems except the Flush system had very low oxygen levels (<0.l% v v ). The Flush system had considerably higher levels of oxygen (0.9%) with associated browning of meat samples. All packaging systems gave a hygienic shelf-life of at least 16 weeks. At 16 weeks, microbial numbers were highest (5 × 10(6)) in the Scavenger system. The meat from all packaging systems was acceptable to taste panels even after 16 weeks of storage at -1.5 °C. There were no significant differences between any of the packaging systems for any of the sensory attributes tested. The packaging systems with the best all round performance were the Flush/Scavenger and the Scavenger systems, depending on the storage-life required.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 22060578     DOI: 10.1016/s0309-1740(97)00135-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Meat Sci        ISSN: 0309-1740            Impact factor:   5.209


  3 in total

1.  Effect of Modified Atmosphere Packaging and Vacuum Packaging on Quality Characteristics of Low Grade Beef during Cold Storage.

Authors:  S J Hur; S K Jin; J H Park; S W Jung; H J Lyu
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.509

2.  Evaluation of the weight loss of raw beef cuts vacuumpackaged with two different techniques.

Authors:  Simone Stella; Daniela Garavaglia; Giorgia Francini; Valeria Viganò; Cristian Bernardi; Erica Tirloni
Journal:  Ital J Food Saf       Date:  2019-12-05

3.  Effect of Essential Oils and Vacuum Packaging on Spoilage-Causing Microorganisms of Marinated Camel Meat during Storage.

Authors:  Tareq M Osaili; Fayeza Hasan; Anas A Al-Nabulsi; Dinesh Kumar Dhanasekaran; Reyad Shaker Obaid; Mona S Hashim; Hadia M Radwan; Leila Cheikh Ismail; Haydar Hasan; Moez Al-Islam E Faris; Farah Naja; Ioannis N Savvaidis; Amin N Olaimat; Mutamed Ayyash; Richard Holley
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-12-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.