Literature DB >> 22059579

Using genome-wide information to minimize the loss of diversity in conservation programmes.

M A R de Cara1, J Fernández, M A Toro, B Villanueva.   

Abstract

We study here the effect of using genome-wide marker data versus genealogical data in population management for the maintenance of diversity in conservation schemes using optimal contributions. We re-examine the benefits of using molecular data for different population and genome sizes and compare different management strategies according to the group of individuals where we take decisions (parents or offspring). We also study the consequences of using estimated genealogical coancestries calculated from molecular information. Using genome-wide marker data performed usually better than using genealogical data or estimated genealogical coancestry to maintain expected and observed heterozygosity. Furthermore, when we could take decisions acting on the offspring, a larger heterozygosity was maintained than when we based our decisions on the potential parents.
© 2011 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22059579     DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2011.00971.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet        ISSN: 0931-2668            Impact factor:   2.380


  21 in total

1.  Purging deleterious mutations in conservation programmes: combining optimal contributions with inbred matings.

Authors:  M Á R de Cara; B Villanueva; M Á Toro; J Fernández
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Changes in Allele Frequencies When Different Genomic Coancestry Matrices Are Used for Maintaining Genetic Diversity.

Authors:  Elisabeth Morales-González; Jesús Fernández; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Miguel Ángel Toro; Beatriz Villanueva
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.096

3.  Advantages of using molecular coancestry in the removal of introgressed genetic material.

Authors:  Carmen Amador; Jesús Fernández; Theo He Meuwissen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Characterizing homozygosity across United States, New Zealand and Australian Jersey cow and bull populations.

Authors:  Jeremy T Howard; Christian Maltecca; Mekonnen Haile-Mariam; Ben J Hayes; Jennie E Pryce
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Using genome-wide measures of coancestry to maintain diversity and fitness in endangered and domestic pig populations.

Authors:  Mirte Bosse; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Ole Madsen; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Oliver A Ryder; Frédéric Austerlitz; Martien A M Groenen; M Angeles R de Cara
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Genome-wide estimates of coancestry and inbreeding in a closed herd of ancient Iberian pigs.

Authors:  María Saura; Almudena Fernández; M Carmen Rodríguez; Miguel A Toro; Carmen Barragán; Ana I Fernández; Beatriz Villanueva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Genomic selection for recovery of original genetic background from hybrids of endangered and common breeds.

Authors:  Carmen Amador; Ben J Hayes; Hans D Daetwyler
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  Artificial selection with traditional or genomic relationships: consequences in coancestry and genetic diversity.

Authors:  Silvia Teresa Rodríguez-Ramilo; Luis Alberto García-Cortés; María Ángeles Rodríguez de Cara
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Investigation of regions impacting inbreeding depression and their association with the additive genetic effect for United States and Australia Jersey dairy cattle.

Authors:  Jeremy T Howard; Mekonnen Haile-Mariam; Jennie E Pryce; Christian Maltecca
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Maintaining genetic diversity using molecular coancestry: the effect of marker density and effective population size.

Authors:  Fernando Gómez-Romano; Beatriz Villanueva; María Angeles Rodríguez de Cara; Jesús Fernández
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.