Literature DB >> 22058847

trans-Dibromidobis(1-ethyl-3-methyl-imidazol-2-yl-idene)palladium(II).

Solveig R Madsen1, Nina Lock, Jacob Overgaard, Bo B Iversen.   

Abstract

The title compound, trans-[PdBr(2)(C(6)H(10)N(2))(2)], was synthesized ionothermally in the ionic liquid solvent 1-ethyl-3-methyl-imidazolium bromide. In the crystal, the Pd(II) atoms are square-planarly coordinated to two Br atoms and two neutral (C(6)H(10)N(2)) ligands. The Pd(II) atom is located on an inversion centre.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22058847      PMCID: PMC3200790          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811030480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

The title complex shares many features with a number of known structures, which also contain a PdII atom square-planarly coordinated to two bromide ligands in trans-conformation as well as two equivalent organic ligands (Hahn et al., 2004 ▶; Huynh & Wu, 2009 ▶). A few of these structures even have the same space group and in some structures the organic ligand is also an imidazolium derivative (Dash et al., 2010 ▶). The title compound was obtained in a attempt to simplify the synthesis of the cis-complex which was described previously (Madsen et al., 2011 ▶). For information on the ionothermal synthesis method, see: Welton (1999 ▶); Babai & Mudring (2006 ▶); Morris (2009 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[PdBr2(C6H10N2)2] M = 486.54 Monoclinic, a = 8.3093 (2) Å b = 8.6868 (2) Å c = 12.0788 (3) Å β = 101.741 (1)° V = 853.62 (4) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 5.76 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.15 × 0.15 × 0.1 mm

Data collection

Bruker X8 APEXII diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2008a ▶) T min = 0.585, T max = 0.711 27485 measured reflections 2582 independent reflections 1894 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.022

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.044 wR(F 2) = 0.167 S = 1.63 2582 reflections 88 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 1.84 e Å−3 Δρmin = −1.02 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2011 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2011 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008b ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008b ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811030480/zk2019sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811030480/zk2019Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[PdBr2(C6H10N2)2]F(000) = 472
Mr = 486.54Dx = 1.893 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 9872 reflections
a = 8.3093 (2) Åθ = 5.5–54.7°
b = 8.6868 (2) ŵ = 5.76 mm1
c = 12.0788 (3) ÅT = 296 K
β = 101.741 (1)°Square, colourless
V = 853.62 (4) Å30.15 × 0.15 × 0.1 mm
Z = 2
Bruker X8 APEXII diffractometer2582 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1894 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.022
Detector resolution: 12.00 pixels mm-1θmax = 30.5°, θmin = 2.7°
Narrow slices collected using φ and ω scansh = −11→11
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2008a)k = −12→12
Tmin = 0.585, Tmax = 0.711l = −15→17
27485 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.044Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.167H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.63w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0705P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2582 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.008
88 parametersΔρmax = 1.84 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −1.02 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N20.8710 (5)0.9917 (3)0.7471 (3)0.0598 (9)
C10.9896 (5)0.9475 (5)0.8355 (3)0.0570 (8)
C30.9059 (7)0.9436 (6)0.6478 (4)0.0735 (11)
H30.84110.95940.57630.088*
C51.2461 (7)0.7839 (10)0.8505 (6)0.118 (2)
H5A1.22690.7470.92250.142*
H5B1.26750.69580.80620.142*
C21.0451 (6)0.8718 (7)0.6700 (4)0.0852 (14)
H21.10020.82940.61760.102*
C61.3777 (13)0.8815 (14)0.8675 (10)0.197 (5)
H6A1.4730.82890.90840.295*
H6B1.35480.96910.91040.295*
H6C1.39770.91520.79590.295*
C40.7242 (7)1.0768 (7)0.7604 (5)0.0953 (17)
H4A0.65721.09730.68730.143*
H4B0.75631.17230.79860.143*
H4C0.66291.01660.80410.143*
Br11.09068 (7)1.25854 (6)0.96387 (4)0.0893 (2)
N11.0978 (4)0.8699 (5)0.7886 (3)0.0772 (10)
Pd11110.0555 (2)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N20.075 (2)0.060 (2)0.0438 (19)0.0033 (13)0.0110 (16)0.0020 (13)
C10.064 (2)0.063 (2)0.047 (2)−0.0089 (17)0.0168 (16)−0.0047 (18)
C30.104 (4)0.073 (3)0.044 (2)−0.009 (3)0.016 (2)−0.002 (2)
C50.080 (3)0.189 (7)0.088 (4)0.017 (4)0.023 (3)−0.011 (4)
C20.100 (4)0.104 (4)0.059 (3)−0.001 (3)0.033 (3)−0.006 (3)
C60.136 (7)0.207 (12)0.231 (13)−0.009 (9)0.000 (7)0.036 (9)
C40.104 (4)0.114 (4)0.064 (3)0.052 (4)0.010 (3)0.006 (3)
Br10.1261 (5)0.0831 (4)0.0624 (4)−0.0312 (3)0.0278 (3)−0.0070 (2)
N10.0732 (19)0.108 (3)0.0529 (19)0.008 (2)0.0181 (16)−0.0060 (19)
Pd10.0597 (3)0.0696 (4)0.0386 (3)−0.00208 (16)0.01357 (18)−0.00364 (15)
N2—C11.353 (6)C2—N11.410 (6)
N2—C31.356 (6)C2—H20.93
N2—C41.463 (6)C6—H6A0.96
C1—N11.338 (5)C6—H6B0.96
C1—Pd12.023 (4)C6—H6C0.96
C3—C21.293 (7)C4—H4A0.96
C3—H30.93C4—H4B0.96
C5—C61.366 (12)C4—H4C0.96
C5—N11.503 (7)Br1—Pd12.4364 (5)
C5—H5A0.97Pd1—C1i2.023 (4)
C5—H5B0.97Pd1—Br1i2.4364 (5)
C1—N2—C3111.0 (4)H6A—C6—H6B109.5
C1—N2—C4123.1 (4)C5—C6—H6C109.5
C3—N2—C4125.9 (4)H6A—C6—H6C109.5
N1—C1—N2104.7 (3)H6B—C6—H6C109.5
N1—C1—Pd1129.1 (3)N2—C4—H4A109.5
N2—C1—Pd1126.2 (3)N2—C4—H4B109.5
C2—C3—N2107.9 (4)H4A—C4—H4B109.5
C2—C3—H3126N2—C4—H4C109.5
N2—C3—H3126H4A—C4—H4C109.5
C6—C5—N1108.5 (8)H4B—C4—H4C109.5
C6—C5—H5A110C1—N1—C2109.1 (4)
N1—C5—H5A110C1—N1—C5126.4 (4)
C6—C5—H5B110C2—N1—C5124.3 (4)
N1—C5—H5B110C1—Pd1—C1i180.000 (2)
H5A—C5—H5B108.4C1—Pd1—Br189.14 (12)
C3—C2—N1107.2 (4)C1i—Pd1—Br190.86 (12)
C3—C2—H2126.4C1—Pd1—Br1i90.86 (12)
N1—C2—H2126.4C1i—Pd1—Br1i89.14 (12)
C5—C6—H6A109.5Br1—Pd1—Br1i180
C5—C6—H6B109.5
C3—N2—C1—N1−0.5 (5)Pd1—C1—N1—C58.6 (7)
C4—N2—C1—N1178.1 (4)C3—C2—N1—C1−2.4 (6)
C3—N2—C1—Pd1176.8 (3)C3—C2—N1—C5173.7 (5)
C4—N2—C1—Pd1−4.7 (6)C6—C5—N1—C1−91.6 (8)
C1—N2—C3—C2−1.1 (6)C6—C5—N1—C293.0 (8)
C4—N2—C3—C2−179.6 (5)N1—C1—Pd1—Br1100.3 (4)
N2—C3—C2—N12.1 (6)N2—C1—Pd1—Br1−76.2 (4)
N2—C1—N1—C21.7 (5)N1—C1—Pd1—Br1i−79.7 (4)
Pd1—C1—N1—C2−175.4 (3)N2—C1—Pd1—Br1i103.8 (4)
N2—C1—N1—C5−174.3 (5)
C1—Pd12.023 (4)
Br1—Pd12.4364 (5)
C1—Pd1—C1i180
C1—Pd1—Br189.14 (12)
C1i—Pd1—Br190.86 (12)
Br1—Pd1—Br1i180

Symmetry code: (i) .

  5 in total

1.  Room-Temperature Ionic Liquids. Solvents for Synthesis and Catalysis.

Authors:  Thomas Welton
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  1999-08-11       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  A comparison between nickel and palladium precatalysts of 1,2,4-triazole based N-heterocyclic carbenes in hydroamination of activated olefins.

Authors:  Chandrakanta Dash; Mobin M Shaikh; Ray J Butcher; Prasenjit Ghosh
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 4.390

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Ionothermal synthesis--ionic liquids as functional solvents in the preparation of crystalline materials.

Authors:  Russell E Morris
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  Crystal engineering in ionic liquids. The crystal structures of [Mppyr]3[NdI6] and [Bmpyr]4[NdI6][Tf2N].

Authors:  Arash Babai; Anja-Verena Mudring
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 5.165

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.