Literature DB >> 22058776

2-Ethyl-piperidinium chloride.

Mohammad T M Al-Dajani, Jamal Talaat, Abdusalam Salhin, Madhukar Hemamalini, Hoong-Kun Fun.   

Abstract

In the title molecular salt, C(7)H(16)N(+)·Cl(-), the piperidinium ring adopts a chair conformation. In the crystal, the two components are connected by N-H⋯Cl and C-H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds, forming a supra-molecular double-chain structure along the c axis.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22058776      PMCID: PMC3201318          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811036804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For biological applications of piperidine, see: Waelbroeck et al. (1992 ▶); El Hadri et al. (1995 ▶). For puckering parameters, see: Cremer & Pople (1975 ▶). For the stability of the temperature controller used in the data collection, see: Cosier & Glazer (1986 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H16N+·Cl− M = 149.66 Orthorhombic, a = 24.2052 (6) Å b = 9.7594 (3) Å c = 7.2764 (2) Å V = 1718.89 (8) Å3 Z = 8 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.37 mm−1 T = 100 K 0.72 × 0.27 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009 ▶) T min = 0.778, T max = 0.948 50389 measured reflections 4453 independent reflections 3438 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.045

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.040 wR(F 2) = 0.088 S = 1.07 4453 reflections 91 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.34 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.27 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811036804/is2773sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811036804/is2773Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811036804/is2773Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H16N+·ClF(000) = 656
Mr = 149.66Dx = 1.157 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PbcnMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2n 2abCell parameters from 9898 reflections
a = 24.2052 (6) Åθ = 2.3–36.9°
b = 9.7594 (3) ŵ = 0.37 mm1
c = 7.2764 (2) ÅT = 100 K
V = 1718.89 (8) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 80.72 × 0.27 × 0.15 mm
Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer4453 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube3438 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.045
φ and ω scansθmax = 37.3°, θmin = 1.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009)h = −40→40
Tmin = 0.778, Tmax = 0.948k = −16→16
50389 measured reflectionsl = −12→12
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.088H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.07w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0343P)2 + 0.4206P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
4453 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
91 parametersΔρmax = 0.34 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.27 e Å3
Experimental. The crystal was placed in the cold stream of an Oxford Cryosystems Cobra open-flow nitrogen cryostat (Cosier & Glazer, 1986) operating at 100.0 (1) K.
Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.39971 (3)0.13082 (7)0.95142 (9)0.01471 (11)
C10.45090 (3)0.18923 (8)1.03505 (12)0.01927 (15)
H1A0.48380.14820.97610.023*
H1B0.45200.16701.16780.023*
C20.45182 (4)0.34373 (9)1.00941 (12)0.02298 (17)
H2A0.45430.36550.87680.028*
H2B0.48480.38231.07100.028*
C30.39979 (4)0.40873 (9)1.08969 (12)0.02384 (17)
H3A0.39990.50841.06470.029*
H3B0.39930.39551.22460.029*
C40.34807 (4)0.34393 (8)1.00500 (12)0.01959 (15)
H4A0.31480.38371.06380.024*
H4B0.34670.36640.87240.024*
C50.34710 (3)0.18860 (8)1.02842 (10)0.01526 (13)
H5A0.34520.16671.16250.018*
C60.29921 (4)0.11725 (8)0.93081 (12)0.01881 (14)
H6A0.30110.13820.79780.023*
H6B0.30330.01690.94550.023*
C70.24270 (4)0.16025 (11)1.00354 (15)0.02814 (19)
H7A0.21380.11060.93690.042*
H7B0.23780.25900.98550.042*
H7C0.24030.13881.13490.042*
H1NA0.4002 (5)0.0410 (14)0.9689 (17)0.021 (3)*
H2NA0.4007 (4)0.1476 (13)0.830 (2)0.024 (3)*
Cl10.401145 (8)0.182057 (18)0.52892 (2)0.01611 (5)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0164 (3)0.0142 (3)0.0135 (3)0.0003 (2)0.0004 (2)0.0007 (2)
C10.0173 (3)0.0207 (3)0.0198 (3)−0.0028 (3)−0.0031 (3)0.0026 (3)
C20.0263 (4)0.0213 (4)0.0213 (4)−0.0086 (3)−0.0037 (3)0.0031 (3)
C30.0368 (5)0.0158 (3)0.0189 (3)−0.0042 (3)−0.0016 (3)−0.0012 (3)
C40.0254 (4)0.0137 (3)0.0197 (3)0.0020 (3)0.0015 (3)0.0000 (3)
C50.0176 (3)0.0142 (3)0.0140 (3)0.0010 (2)0.0026 (3)0.0008 (2)
C60.0166 (3)0.0188 (3)0.0210 (3)−0.0001 (3)0.0004 (3)0.0002 (3)
C70.0186 (4)0.0286 (4)0.0372 (5)0.0007 (3)0.0062 (4)0.0015 (4)
Cl10.02022 (9)0.01473 (8)0.01339 (7)−0.00044 (6)0.00104 (6)0.00007 (5)
N1—C11.4935 (11)C3—H3B0.9900
N1—C51.5012 (10)C4—C51.5256 (11)
N1—H1NA0.886 (13)C4—H4A0.9900
N1—H2NA0.896 (14)C4—H4B0.9900
C1—C21.5195 (12)C5—C61.5275 (11)
C1—H1A0.9900C5—H5A1.0000
C1—H1B0.9900C6—C71.5256 (13)
C2—C31.5264 (14)C6—H6A0.9900
C2—H2A0.9900C6—H6B0.9900
C2—H2B0.9900C7—H7A0.9800
C3—C41.5318 (13)C7—H7B0.9800
C3—H3A0.9900C7—H7C0.9800
C1—N1—C5114.10 (6)C5—C4—C3112.20 (7)
C1—N1—H1NA108.0 (7)C5—C4—H4A109.2
C5—N1—H1NA109.2 (7)C3—C4—H4A109.2
C1—N1—H2NA108.0 (7)C5—C4—H4B109.2
C5—N1—H2NA108.7 (7)C3—C4—H4B109.2
H1NA—N1—H2NA108.7 (11)H4A—C4—H4B107.9
N1—C1—C2109.93 (7)N1—C5—C4108.57 (7)
N1—C1—H1A109.7N1—C5—C6107.40 (6)
C2—C1—H1A109.7C4—C5—C6114.38 (7)
N1—C1—H1B109.7N1—C5—H5A108.8
C2—C1—H1B109.7C4—C5—H5A108.8
H1A—C1—H1B108.2C6—C5—H5A108.8
C1—C2—C3110.69 (7)C7—C6—C5113.19 (7)
C1—C2—H2A109.5C7—C6—H6A108.9
C3—C2—H2A109.5C5—C6—H6A108.9
C1—C2—H2B109.5C7—C6—H6B108.9
C3—C2—H2B109.5C5—C6—H6B108.9
H2A—C2—H2B108.1H6A—C6—H6B107.8
C2—C3—C4110.41 (7)C6—C7—H7A109.5
C2—C3—H3A109.6C6—C7—H7B109.5
C4—C3—H3A109.6H7A—C7—H7B109.5
C2—C3—H3B109.6C6—C7—H7C109.5
C4—C3—H3B109.6H7A—C7—H7C109.5
H3A—C3—H3B108.1H7B—C7—H7C109.5
C5—N1—C1—C2−58.09 (9)C1—N1—C5—C6−179.25 (6)
N1—C1—C2—C356.11 (9)C3—C4—C5—N1−54.61 (9)
C1—C2—C3—C4−55.59 (9)C3—C4—C5—C6−174.51 (7)
C2—C3—C4—C555.68 (9)N1—C5—C6—C7176.69 (7)
C1—N1—C5—C456.59 (8)C4—C5—C6—C7−62.75 (10)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1NA···Cl1i0.886 (14)2.220 (14)3.1054 (7)176.9 (11)
N1—H2NA···Cl10.899 (15)2.217 (15)3.1149 (7)177.8 (12)
C1—H1A···Cl1ii0.992.803.6121 (8)139
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1NA⋯Cl1i0.886 (14)2.220 (14)3.1054 (7)176.9 (11)
N1—H2NA⋯Cl10.899 (15)2.217 (15)3.1149 (7)177.8 (12)
C1—H1A⋯Cl1ii0.992.803.6121 (8)139

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  4 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Binding properties of nine 4-diphenyl-acetoxy-N-methyl-piperidine (4-DAMP) analogues to M1, M2, M3 and putative M4 muscarinic receptor subtypes.

Authors:  M Waelbroeck; J Camus; M Tastenoy; J Christophe
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Syntheses, activity and modeling studies of 3- and 4-(sulfo- and sulfonamidoalkyl)pyridine and piperidine-2-carboxylic acid derivatives as analogs of NMDA receptor antagonists.

Authors:  A el Hadri; P Maldivi; G Leclerc; J P Rocher
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.