PURPOSE: To assess the Acanthamoeba trophozoite viability in vitro and treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis in a hamster model using ultraviolet light A (UV-A) and riboflavin (B2). METHODS: A sample of Acanthamoeba sp. cultured was transferred to a 96-well plate and exposed to B2 and the UV-A light (365 nm wavelength) at a power density of 3 mW/cm(2), 8 mm spot diameter, for 30 minutes. The exposure was done in triplicate. Control groups were prepared in triplicate as well: blank control, UV-A only, riboflavin only, and dead control. Cell viability assessment was done using the trypan blue dye exclusion method. Acanthamoeba keratitis was induced in Chinese hamsters; who were randomly assigned to one of the animal groups: UV-A + B2, propamidine isethionate (Brolene; Sanofi-Aventis, Ellerslie, Auckland, Australia), UV-A + B2 + propamidine isethionate (Brolene), only UV-A, only B2, and blank. Throughout the 14 days after treatment the animals were examined clinically. Histology and clinical scores of all groups were compared. RESULTS: The in vitro study showed no difference between the treatment group UV-A + B2 and the control groups. In the hamster keratitis model a significant improvement of clinical score was observed for the groups propamidine isethionate (Brolene) and UV-A + B2 + propamidine isethionate (Brolene) (P = 0.0067). Also a significant worsening of clinical score was observed in the other groups: UV-A + B2 group (P = 0.0084), only UV-A (P = 0.0078), B2 only (P = 0.0084), and blank (P = 0.0082). No difference was observed between propamidine isethionate (Brolene) and UV-A + B2 + propamidine isethionate (Brolene). CONCLUSIONS: The adjunctive use of UV-A and B2 therapy did not demonstrate antitrophozoite activity; in vivo UV-A and B2 did not demonstrate efficacy in this model.
PURPOSE: To assess the Acanthamoeba trophozoite viability in vitro and treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis in a hamster model using ultraviolet light A (UV-A) and riboflavin (B2). METHODS: A sample of Acanthamoeba sp. cultured was transferred to a 96-well plate and exposed to B2 and the UV-A light (365 nm wavelength) at a power density of 3 mW/cm(2), 8 mm spot diameter, for 30 minutes. The exposure was done in triplicate. Control groups were prepared in triplicate as well: blank control, UV-A only, riboflavin only, and dead control. Cell viability assessment was done using the trypan blue dye exclusion method. Acanthamoeba keratitis was induced in Chinese hamsters; who were randomly assigned to one of the animal groups: UV-A + B2, propamidine isethionate (Brolene; Sanofi-Aventis, Ellerslie, Auckland, Australia), UV-A + B2 + propamidine isethionate (Brolene), only UV-A, only B2, and blank. Throughout the 14 days after treatment the animals were examined clinically. Histology and clinical scores of all groups were compared. RESULTS: The in vitro study showed no difference between the treatment group UV-A + B2 and the control groups. In the hamster keratitis model a significant improvement of clinical score was observed for the groups propamidine isethionate (Brolene) and UV-A + B2 + propamidine isethionate (Brolene) (P = 0.0067). Also a significant worsening of clinical score was observed in the other groups: UV-A + B2 group (P = 0.0084), only UV-A (P = 0.0078), B2 only (P = 0.0084), and blank (P = 0.0082). No difference was observed between propamidine isethionate (Brolene) and UV-A + B2 + propamidine isethionate (Brolene). CONCLUSIONS: The adjunctive use of UV-A and B2 therapy did not demonstrate antitrophozoite activity; in vivo UV-A and B2 did not demonstrate efficacy in this model.
Authors: Ricardo Lamy; Elliot Chan; Samuel D Good; Vicky Cevallos; Travis C Porco; Jay M Stewart Journal: Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 4.207
Authors: Renata T Kashiwabuchi; Fabio R S Carvalho; Yasin A Khan; Flavio Hirai; Mauro S Campos; Peter J McDonnell Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2012-11-25 Impact factor: 3.117