Literature DB >> 22058294

The extent of the bone defect affects the outcome of femoral reconstruction in revision surgery with impacted bone grafting: a five- to 17-year follow-up study.

E Garcia-Cimbrelo1, E Garcia-Rey, A Cruz-Pardos.   

Abstract

We report the results of 79 patients (81 hips) who underwent impaction grafting at revision hip replacement using the Exeter femoral stem. Their mean age was 64 years (31 to 83). According to the Endoklinik classification, 20 hips had a type 2 bone defect, 40 had type 3, and 21 had type 4. The mean follow-up for unrevised stems was 10.4 years (5 to 17). There were 12 re-operations due to intra- and post-operative fractures, infection (one hip) and aseptic loosening (one hip). All re-operations affected type 3 (6 hips) and 4 (6 hips) bone defects. The survival rate for re-operation for any cause was 100% for type 2, 81.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 67.1 to 95.3) for type 3, and 70.8% (95% CI 51.1 to 90.5) for type 4 defects at 14 years. The survival rate with further revision for aseptic loosening as the end point was 98.6% (95% CI 95.8 to 100). The final clinical score was higher for patients with type 2 bone defects than type 4 regarding pain, function and range of movement. Limp was most frequent in the type 4 group (p < 0.001). The mean subsidence of the stem was 2.3 mm (SD 3.7) for hips with a type 2 defect, 4.3 mm (SD 7.2) for type 3 and 9.6 mm (SD 10.8) for type 4 (p = 0.022). The impacted bone grafting technique has good clinical results in femoral revision. However, major bone defects affect clinical outcome and also result in more operative complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22058294     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B11.27321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  5 in total

Review 1.  Particle disease: biologic mechanisms of periprosthetic osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jiri Gallo; Stuart B Goodman; Yrjö T Konttinen; Milan Raska
Journal:  Innate Immun       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 2.680

2.  Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?

Authors:  Kirill Gromov; Alma B Pedersen; Søren Overgaard; Peter Gebuhr; Henrik Malchau; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  What is the long-term survival of impaction allografting of the femur?

Authors:  Kevin L Garvin; Beau S Konigsberg; Natalie D Ommen; Elizabeth R Lyden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Osteogenic activity of silver-loaded coral hydroxyapatite and its investigation in vivo.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Qing-Shui Yin; Chu-Song Zhou; Hong Xia; Ying Zhang; Yan-Peng Jiao
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Medium-term follow-up of 92 femoral component revisions using a third-generation cementing technique.

Authors:  Martijn A J Te Stroet; Wim H C Rijnen; Jean W M Gardeniers; Albert Van Kampen; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.