Literature DB >> 22058015

An adaptation of the human HepaRG cells to the in vitro micronucleus assay.

Rozenn Jossé1, Alexandra Rogue, Elisabeth Lorge, André Guillouzo.   

Abstract

The in vitro micronucleus test is considered as an attractive tool for genotoxicity testing of chemicals because of its simplicity of scoring and wide applicability in different cell types. However, most of the cells currently in use are devoid of the enzyme equipment required for activation of promutagens in the genotoxic metabolites. We postulated that the human HepaRG cell line, which can express xenobiotic metabolising enzymes at levels close to those found in primary human hepatocytes and has retained the indefinite growth capacity of transformed cells, could represent a more suitable model for genotoxicity testing of chemicals requiring metabolic activation. Based on the recommendations of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development test guideline TG 487 for testing of chemicals, HepaRG cell cultures containing >80% mature hepatocytes were treated in situ with various chemicals for 24 h followed by a 3-day mitogenic stimulation with epidermal growth factor without cytokinesis block. In such culture conditions, HepaRG cells underwent >1.5 cell cycle per cell during the mitogenic stimulation. While non-genotoxic compounds (mannitol and staurosporine) did not increase the rate of micronucleated mononucleated cells, all aneugens (colchicine, nocodazole and dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene) as well as the direct acting clastogen methyl methanesulfonate and clastogens requiring metabolic activation (aflatoxin B1, benzo(a)pyrene and 2-nitrofluorene) induced a statistically significant concentration-related increase in the number of mono-micronucleated cells. The micronucleus test was also performed after 7-day repeat exposure of HepaRG cells to the chemicals. Noticeably, a time-dependent effect was obtained with the three clastogens requiring metabolic activation. In conclusion, our results obtained with HepaRG hepatocytes exposed to various genotoxic compounds requiring or not bioactivation, compared favorably with those reported in various other cell types. They support the view that metabolically competent HepaRG cells have unique potential benefits for testing genotoxic compounds using the in vitro micronucleus assay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22058015     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/ger076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  9 in total

1.  DMSO-free highly differentiated HepaRG spheroids for chronic toxicity, liver functions and genotoxicity studies.

Authors:  Marie Cuvellier; Frédéric Ezan; Georges Baffet; Sophie Langouët; Sophie Rose; Jennifer Carteret; Arnaud Bruyère; Vincent Legagneux; Fabrice Nesslany
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 5.153

2.  Towards better prediction of xenobiotic genotoxicity: CometChip technology coupled with a 3D model of HepaRG human liver cells.

Authors:  Audrey Barranger; Ludovic Le Hégarat
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 6.168

3.  Sensitive CometChip assay for screening potentially carcinogenic DNA adducts by trapping DNA repair intermediates.

Authors:  Le P Ngo; Norah A Owiti; Carol Swartz; John Winters; Yang Su; Jing Ge; Aoli Xiong; Jongyoon Han; Leslie Recio; Leona D Samson; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Comparison of methods used for evaluation of mutagenicity/genotoxicity of model chemicals - parabens.

Authors:  J Chrz; B Hošíková; L Svobodová; D Očadlíková; H Kolářová; M Dvořáková; K Kejlová; L Malina; G Jírová; A Vlková; M Mannerström
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 1.881

5.  Transcriptional and Epigenetic Consequences of DMSO Treatment on HepaRG Cells.

Authors:  Hélène Dubois-Pot-Schneider; Caroline Aninat; Kathrin Kattler; Karim Fekir; Kathleen Jarnouen; Virginie Cerec; Denise Glaise; Abdulrahman Salhab; Gilles Gasparoni; Kubo Takashi; Seiichi Ishida; Jörn Walter; Anne Corlu
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 7.666

6.  Carboxylated short single-walled carbon nanotubes but not plain and multi-walled short carbon nanotubes show in vitro genotoxicity.

Authors:  Maria Mrakovcic; Claudia Meindl; Gerd Leitinger; Eva Roblegg; Eleonore Fröhlich
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Use of HuH6 and other human-derived hepatoma lines for the detection of genotoxins: a new hope for laboratory animals?

Authors:  Monika Waldherr; Miroslav Mišík; Franziska Ferk; Jana Tomc; Bojana Žegura; Metka Filipič; Wolfgang Mikulits; Sören Mai; Oskar Haas; Wolfgang W Huber; Elisabeth Haslinger; Siegfried Knasmüller
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Flow cytometric micronucleus assay and TGx-DDI transcriptomic biomarker analysis of ten genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals in human HepaRG™ cells.

Authors:  Julie K Buick; Andrew Williams; Rémi Gagné; Carol D Swartz; Leslie Recio; Stephen S Ferguson; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2020-02-04

9.  Adaptation of the in vitro micronucleus assay for genotoxicity testing using 3D liver models supporting longer-term exposure durations.

Authors:  Gillian E Conway; Ume-Kulsoom Shah; Samantha Llewellyn; Tereza Cervena; Stephen J Evans; Abdullah S Al Ali; Gareth J Jenkins; Martin J D Clift; Shareen H Doak
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 3.000

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.