Literature DB >> 22057898

Protein storage and root:shoot reallocation provide tolerance to damage in a hybrid willow system.

Cris G Hochwender1, Dong H Cha, Mary Ellen Czesak, Robert S Fritz, Rebecca R Smyth, Arlen D Kaufman, Brandi Warren, Ashley Neuman.   

Abstract

To determine the mechanistic basis of tolerance, we evaluated six candidate traits for tolerance to damage using F(2) interspecific hybrids in a willow hybrid system. A distinction was made between reproductive tolerance and biomass tolerance; reproductive tolerance was designated as a plant's proportional change in catkin production following damage, while biomass tolerance referred to a plant's proportional change in biomass (i.e., regrowth) following damage. F(2) hybrids were generated to increase variation and independence among candidate traits. Using three clonally identical individuals, pre-damage candidate traits for tolerance to damage (root:shoot ratio, total nonstructural carbohydrate, and total available protein) and post-damage candidate traits (relative root:shoot ratio, phenolic ratio, and specific leaf area ratio) were measured. The range of variation for these six candidate traits was broad. Biomass was significantly increased two years after 50% shoot length removal, and catkin production was not significantly reduced when damaged, suggesting that F(2) hybrids had great biomass tolerance and reproductive tolerance. Based on multiple regression methods, increased reproductive tolerance was associated with increased protein storage and decreased relative root:shoot ratio (reduced root allocation after damage). In addition, a positive relationship between biomass tolerance and condensed tannins was detected, and both traits were associated with increased reproductive tolerance. These four factors explained 57% of the variance in the reproductive tolerance of F(2) hybrids, but biomass tolerance explained the majority of the variance in reproductive tolerance. Changes in plant architecture in response to plant damage may be the underlying mechanism that explains biomass tolerance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22057898     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2176-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  28 in total

1.  Limitations of Folin assays of foliar phenolics in ecological studies.

Authors:  H M Appel; H L Govenor; M D'Ascenzo; E Siska; J C Schultz
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Competition- and resource-mediated tradeoffs between growth and defensive chemistry in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides).

Authors:  Jack R Donaldson; Eric L Kruger; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  On quantifying tolerance of herbivory for comparative analyses.

Authors:  Michael J Wise; David E Carr
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Notes on sugar determination.

Authors:  M SMOGYI
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1952-03       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Applying the limiting resource model to plant tolerance of apical meristem damage.

Authors:  Michael J Wise; Warren G Abrahamson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Performance of several variable-selection methods applied to real ecological data.

Authors:  Paul A Murtaugh
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Additive effects of genotype, nutrient availability and type of tissue damage on the compensatory response of Salix planifolia ssp. planifolia to simulated herbivory.

Authors:  Gilles Houle; Geneviève Simard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  COSTS OF INDUCED RESPONSES AND TOLERANCE TO HERBIVORY IN MALE AND FEMALE FITNESS COMPONENTS OF WILD RADISH.

Authors:  Anurag A Agrawal; Sharon Y Strauss; Michael J Stout
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Shifts in biomass and resource allocation patterns following defoliation in Eucalyptus globulus growing with varying water and nutrient supplies.

Authors:  Alieta Eyles; Elizabeth A Pinkard; Caroline Mohammed
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 4.196

10.  Measuring plant protein with the Bradford assay : 1. Evaluation and standard method.

Authors:  C G Jones; J Daniel Hare; S J Compton
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  6 in total

1.  Low tolerance to simulated herbivory in Hawaiian seedlings despite induced changes in photosynthesis and biomass allocation.

Authors:  Kasey E Barton
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Ontogenetic patterns in the mechanisms of tolerance to herbivory in Plantago.

Authors:  Kasey E Barton
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-04-14       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Loss of specificity: native but not invasive populations of Triadica sebifera vary in tolerance to different herbivores.

Authors:  Juli Carrillo; Daniel McDermott; Evan Siemann
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Costs and benefits of omnivore-mediated plant protection: effects of plant-feeding on Salix growth more detrimental than expected.

Authors:  Adriana Puentes; Christer Björkman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Grain amaranths are defoliation tolerant crop species capable of utilizing stem and root carbohydrate reserves to sustain vegetative and reproductive growth after leaf loss.

Authors:  Erandi Vargas-Ortiz; Eduardo Espitia-Rangel; Axel Tiessen; John Paul Délano-Frier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Resource availability and repeated defoliation mediate compensatory growth in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) seedlings.

Authors:  Nadir Erbilgin; David A Galvez; Bin Zhang; Ahmed Najar
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.