Literature DB >> 22057894

Managing emissions of active pharmaceutical ingredients from manufacturing facilities: an environmental quality standard approach.

Richard J Murray-Smith1, Vyvyan T Coombe, Marie Haag Grönlund, Fredrik Waern, James A Baird.   

Abstract

Active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) residues have been found to be widespread in the aquatic environment, albeit in most cases at trace levels, with the route to the environment predominantly being via therapeutic use and subsequent excretion to sewer. Although manufacturing discharges may be a low overall contributor to environmental concentrations, they need to be managed effectively so that they do not adversely affect the local receiving environment. In order to achieve this, a risk-based approach is proposed that identifies the long-term and short-term concentrations, referred to as environmental reference concentrations (ERCs) and maximum tolerable concentrations (MTCs), respectively, of an API which should not be exceeded in the aquatic environment receiving effluent from pharmaceutical manufacturing sites. The ERC approach is based on established environmental quality standard concepts currently used in much national and international legislation. Building on these concepts, the approach takes into account indirect exposure of potential consumers such as fish-eating mammals and humans, as well as primary producers (e.g., algae) and primary and secondary consumers (e.g., invertebrates and fish). Although chronic toxicity data are preferred for ERC derivation, acute data, with appropriate considerations of uncertainty, may be used when chronic data are not available. This approach takes all available information into account, particularly for older established medicines that may predate current regulatory requirements for environmental data, and consequently helps prioritize resources for environmental testing. The ERC approach has been applied to 30 of AstraZeneca's APIs. Merits of the approach are discussed together with opportunities for potential future refinement.
Copyright © 2011 SETAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22057894     DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  8 in total

1.  Drug pollution: industry responds.

Authors:  Jason Snape; Wesley White
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Sources, impacts and trends of pharmaceuticals in the marine and coastal environment.

Authors:  Sally Gaw; Kevin V Thomas; Thomas H Hutchinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Environmental Risk Assessment of Pharmaceutical Mixtures: Demands, Gaps, and Possible Bridges.

Authors:  Thomas Backhaus
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 4.  Comparative metabolism as a key driver of wildlife species sensitivity to human and veterinary pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Thomas H Hutchinson; Judith C Madden; Vinny Naidoo; Colin H Walker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Implementing ecopharmacovigilance in practice: challenges and potential opportunities.

Authors:  Gisela Holm; Jason R Snape; Richard Murray-Smith; John Talbot; David Taylor; Pernilla Sörme
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Pollution from drug manufacturing: review and perspectives.

Authors:  D G Joakim Larsson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Environmental Risk Assessment for the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Mycophenolic Acid in European Surface Waters.

Authors:  Jürg Oliver Straub; Rik Oldenkamp; Thomas Pfister; Andreas Häner
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 8.  Management options for reducing the release of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes to the environment.

Authors:  Amy Pruden; D G Joakim Larsson; Alejandro Amézquita; Peter Collignon; Kristian K Brandt; David W Graham; James M Lazorchak; Satoru Suzuki; Peter Silley; Jason R Snape; Edward Topp; Tong Zhang; Yong-Guan Zhu
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.