Literature DB >> 22057837

The shape of the myelosuppression time profile is related to the probability of developing neutropenic fever in patients with docetaxel-induced grade IV neutropenia.

Emma K Hansson1, Lena E Friberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is associated with the risk of developing febrile neutropenia (FN). The aim was to describe the time course of myelosuppression in breast cancer patients treated with docetaxel and to investigate how the shape of the predicted myelosuppression time course and earlier proposed risk factors influence the probability of developing FN.
METHODS: Neutrophil counts from 140 breast cancer patients with observed grade IV neutropenia during the first course of docetaxel treatment were included. Twenty-six of the patients (19%) experienced FN. The myelosuppression time course was described using a semi-mechanistic myelosuppression model in NONMEM. The individual myelosuppression model parameters [baseline neutrophil count, mean transit time (MTT) and drug effect parameter (EC(50))], myelosuppression descriptors (nadir, duration of grade IV neutropenia) and earlier suggested risk factors (age, performance status, haemoglobin and liver function) were explored to be related to FN by logistic regression.
RESULTS: The neutrophil time course following docetaxel treatment was well described by the model. EC(50) and MTT were both significantly related to the probability of developing FN where low parameter values result in a rapid decline, low nadir and an increased risk of FN. None of the evaluated risk factors or myelosuppression descriptors were significant.
CONCLUSION: The probability to develop FN in patients who experience grade IV neutropenia was dependent on the myelosuppression time profile. Patients with a rapid neutrophil decline and high drug sensitivity had a higher probability to develop FN. Model-based parameter estimates were superior predictors over descriptive values such as the nadir or duration of neutropenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22057837     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-011-1769-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  10 in total

Review 1.  Bringing Model-Based Prediction to Oncology Clinical Practice: A Review of Pharmacometrics Principles and Applications.

Authors:  Núria Buil-Bruna; José-María López-Picazo; Salvador Martín-Algarra; Iñaki F Trocóniz
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-12-14

2.  The risk of febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients following adjuvant chemotherapy is predicted by the time course of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein by modelling.

Authors:  Ida Netterberg; Mats O Karlsson; Elisabet I Nielsen; Angelica L Quartino; Henrik Lindman; Lena E Friberg
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Model-based approach to early predict prolonged high grade neutropenia in carboplatin-treated patients and guide G-CSF prophylactic treatment.

Authors:  Mélanie L Pastor; Céline M Laffont; Laurence Gladieff; Etienne Chatelut; Didier Concordet
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Disease Progression Modeling: Key Concepts and Recent Developments.

Authors:  Sarah F Cook; Robert R Bies
Journal:  Curr Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2016-08-15

5.  Effects of Prophylactic Administration of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor on Peripheral Leukocyte and Neutrophil Counts Levels After Chemotherapy in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Wei Tian; Yali Wang; Yunxiang Zhou; Yihan Yao; Yongchuan Deng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Dose schedule optimization and the pharmacokinetic driver of neutropenia.

Authors:  Mayankbhai Patel; Santhosh Palani; Arijit Chakravarty; Johnny Yang; Wen Chyi Shyu; Jerome T Mettetal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Pharmacodynamic modeling of adverse effects of anti-cancer drug treatment.

Authors:  A H M de Vries Schultink; A A Suleiman; J H M Schellens; J H Beijnen; A D R Huitema
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 8.  Quantitative translational modeling to facilitate preclinical to clinical efficacy & toxicity translation in oncology.

Authors:  Andy Zx Zhu
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2018-04-23

9.  Developing Exposure/Response Models for Anticancer Drug Treatment: Special Considerations.

Authors:  D R Mould; A-C Walz; T Lave; J P Gibbs; B Frame
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01-21

Review 10.  Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling in oncology: a tool for predicting clinical response.

Authors:  Brendan C Bender; Emilie Schindler; Lena E Friberg
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.335

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.