Literature DB >> 22057834

A geometry force field which converts low-resolution X-ray models to structures with properties found at ultra high resolution.

Colin McMartin1.   

Abstract

A geometry optimization force field was developed using ultra high-resolution structures and tested using high- and low-resolution X-ray structures. Protein and small molecule X-ray data was used. When applied to ultra high-resolution structures the force field conserves the internal geometry and local strain energy. When applied to low-resolution structures there is a small change in geometry accompanied by a large drop in local strain energy. Although optimization causes only small structural changes in low-resolution X-ray models, it dramatically modifies profiles for hydrogen bonding, Van der Waals contact, bonded geometry, and local strain energy, making them almost indistinguishable from those found at high resolution. Further insight into the effect of the force field was obtained by comparing geometries of homologous proteins before and after geometry optimization. Optimization causes homologous regions of structures to become similar in internal geometry and energies. Once again, the changes only require small atomic movements. These findings provide insights into the structure of molecular complexes. The new force field contains only short-range interatomic potential functions. Its effectiveness shows that local geometries are determined by short-range interactions which are well modeled by the force field. Potential applications of this study include detection of possible structural errors, correction of errors with minimal change in geometry, improved understanding and prediction of the effects of modifying ligands or proteins, and computational addition of structural water.
Copyright © 2011 The Protein Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22057834      PMCID: PMC3323782          DOI: 10.1002/pro.760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  14 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Validation of protein crystal structures.

Authors:  G J Kleywegt
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2000-03

Review 3.  Force fields for protein simulations.

Authors:  Jay W Ponder; David A Case
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  2003

4.  A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.

Authors:  Gregory L Warren; C Webster Andrews; Anna-Maria Capelli; Brian Clarke; Judith LaLonde; Millard H Lambert; Mika Lindvall; Neysa Nevins; Simon F Semus; Stefan Senger; Giovanna Tedesco; Ian D Wall; James M Woolven; Catherine E Peishoff; Martha S Head
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 5.  Proteins at atomic resolution.

Authors:  Z Dauter; V S Lamzin; K S Wilson
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.809

6.  QXP: powerful, rapid computer algorithms for structure-based drug design.

Authors:  C McMartin; R S Bohacek
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Identification of dipeptidyl nitriles as potent and selective inhibitors of cathepsin B through structure-based drug design.

Authors:  P D Greenspan; K L Clark; R A Tommasi; S D Cowen; L W McQuire; D L Farley; J H van Duzer; R L Goldberg; H Zhou; Z Du; J J Fitt; D E Coppa; Z Fang; W Macchia; L Zhu; M P Capparelli; R Goldstein; A M Wigg; J R Doughty; R S Bohacek; A K Knap
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2001-12-20       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  On the complexity of Engh and Huber refinement restraints: the angle τ as example.

Authors:  Wouter G Touw; Gert Vriend
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2010-11-16

9.  Crystallography Open Database - an open-access collection of crystal structures.

Authors:  Saulius Gražulis; Daniel Chateigner; Robert T Downs; A F T Yokochi; Miguel Quirós; Luca Lutterotti; Elena Manakova; Justas Butkus; Peter Moeck; Armel Le Bail
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 3.304

Review 10.  Limitations and lessons in the use of X-ray structural information in drug design.

Authors:  Andrew M Davis; Stephen A St-Gallay; Gerard J Kleywegt
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 7.851

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.