BACKGROUND: In international prognostic index (IPI) risk-tailored adult patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), it is still unclear whether the addition of maintenance rituximab (MR) improves progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), after RCHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) therapy. METHODS: In our study, 207 patients (age: 21-59 years) received six 14-day cycles of RCHOP and gained overall response. After RCHOP, 98 patients were enrolled in the observation (OBS) arm. 109 patients continued to receive MR therapy. RESULTS: In IPI risk <2 profile, PFS at 5 years reached 72.9% (MR arm) versus 56% (OBS arm) (P = 0.033). In IPI risk ≥2 profile, PFS estimation at 5 years was 44.9% (MR arm) versus 33.5% (OBS arm) (P = 0.006). It is noteworthy that patients with IPI ≥2 who received MR achieved PFS similar to that for patients in the OBS arm with the IPI <2, 44.9% versus 56% (P = 0.97). In patients with an IPI <2, OS at 5 years was 83.2% (MR arm) versus 81.2% (OBS arm) (P = 0.708). In patients with an IPI ≥2, 5-year OS estimation was 44.6% (MR arm) versus 40.5% (OBS arm) (P = 0.067). Subgroup analysis of patients with an IPI ≥3 risk profile shows a survival benefit for patients receiving MR. OS at 5 years was 62% (MR arm) versus 49% (OBS arm), (P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, maintenance rituximab after RCHOP improves progression-free survival. In addition, overall survival is improved for patients with an IPI ≥3 risk profile receiving MR.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: In international prognostic index (IPI) risk-tailored adult patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), it is still unclear whether the addition of maintenance rituximab (MR) improves progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), after RCHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) therapy. METHODS: In our study, 207 patients (age: 21-59 years) received six 14-day cycles of RCHOP and gained overall response. After RCHOP, 98 patients were enrolled in the observation (OBS) arm. 109 patients continued to receive MR therapy. RESULTS: In IPI risk <2 profile, PFS at 5 years reached 72.9% (MR arm) versus 56% (OBS arm) (P = 0.033). In IPI risk ≥2 profile, PFS estimation at 5 years was 44.9% (MR arm) versus 33.5% (OBS arm) (P = 0.006). It is noteworthy that patients with IPI ≥2 who received MR achieved PFS similar to that for patients in the OBS arm with the IPI <2, 44.9% versus 56% (P = 0.97). In patients with an IPI <2, OS at 5 years was 83.2% (MR arm) versus 81.2% (OBS arm) (P = 0.708). In patients with an IPI ≥2, 5-year OS estimation was 44.6% (MR arm) versus 40.5% (OBS arm) (P = 0.067). Subgroup analysis of patients with an IPI ≥3 risk profile shows a survival benefit for patients receiving MR. OS at 5 years was 62% (MR arm) versus 49% (OBS arm), (P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, maintenance rituximab after RCHOP improves progression-free survival. In addition, overall survival is improved for patients with an IPI ≥3 risk profile receiving MR.
Authors: B D Cheson; S J Horning; B Coiffier; M A Shipp; R I Fisher; J M Connors; T A Lister; J Vose; A Grillo-López; A Hagenbeek; F Cabanillas; D Klippensten; W Hiddemann; R Castellino; N L Harris; J O Armitage; W Carter; R Hoppe; G P Canellos Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thomas M Habermann; Edie A Weller; Vicki A Morrison; Randy D Gascoyne; Peter A Cassileth; Jeffrey B Cohn; Shaker R Dakhil; Bruce Woda; Richard I Fisher; Bruce A Peterson; Sandra J Horning Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-06-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: T A Lister; D Crowther; S B Sutcliffe; E Glatstein; G P Canellos; R C Young; S A Rosenberg; C A Coltman; M Tubiana Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1989-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: N L Harris; E S Jaffe; J Diebold; G Flandrin; H K Muller-Hermelink; J Vardiman; T A Lister; C D Bloomfield Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: T Philip; C Guglielmi; A Hagenbeek; R Somers; H Van der Lelie; D Bron; P Sonneveld; C Gisselbrecht; J Y Cahn; J L Harousseau Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1995-12-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: T Kewalramani; A D Zelenetz; E E Hedrick; G B Donnelly; S Hunte; A C Priovolos; J Qin; N C Lyons; J Yahalom; S D Nimer; C H Moskowitz Journal: Blood Date: 2000-10-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: E M McKelvey; J A Gottlieb; H E Wilson; A Haut; R W Talley; R Stephens; M Lane; J F Gamble; S E Jones; P N Grozea; J Gutterman; C Coltman; T E Moon Journal: Cancer Date: 1976-10 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Howard Hochster; Edie Weller; Randy D Gascoyne; Thomas M Habermann; Leo I Gordon; Theresa Ryan; Lijun Zhang; Natalia Colocci; Stanley Frankel; Sandra J Horning Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-03-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ulrich Jaeger; Marek Trneny; Helen Melzer; Michael Praxmarer; Weerasak Nawarawong; Dina Ben Yehuda; David Goldstein; Bilijana Mihaljevic; Osman Ilhan; Veronika Ballova; Michael Hedenus; Liang-Tsai Hsiao; Wing-Yan Au; Sonja Burgstaller; Gerhard Weidinger; Felix Keil; Christian Dittrich; Cathrin Skrabs; Anton Klingler; Andreas Chott; Michael A Fridrik; Richard Greil Journal: Haematologica Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 9.941