Literature DB >> 2205768

Ethical issues in administrative continuous improvement. Applying the concept of prior notification to the conduct of firm trials.

H I Goldberg1.   

Abstract

Consensus exists concerning the distinctions to be drawn between clinical practice and research. When the latter is undertaken, established regulations require that protocols including plans for obtaining subjects' informed consent be submitted to Institutional Review Boards for approval. Less consensus or codification exists concerning evaluations conducted by managers in health care settings. The recent development of firm systems, in which randomized, controlled designs are employed to evaluate administrative interventions, provides a unique context in which to consider whether the subjects of administrative evaluations should be afforded protections granted subjects of clinical research. Accordingly, the history of firm trials from an ethical perspective is reviewed. At the University of Washington, participants of such studies are informed through the process of prior notification, an adaptation of procedures employed widely to inform patients that records or specimens may be used in epidemiologic or biomedical research. Prior notification appears to be a useful refinement of the firm system methodology, one that may have application to managerial manipulations in other arenas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Cleveland Metropolitan General Hospital; Health Care and Public Health; University of Washington

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2205768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  1 in total

1.  When does quality improvement count as research? Human subject protection and theories of knowledge.

Authors:  J Lynn
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.