Literature DB >> 22056980

Effect of sugar-sweetened beverages on body weight in children: design and baseline characteristics of the Double-blind, Randomized INtervention study in Kids.

Janne Catharine de Ruyter1, Margreet Renate Olthof, Lothar David Jan Kuijper, Martijn Bernard Katan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages is associated with overweight in observational studies. A possible explanation is that liquid sugars do not satiate and that their intake is not compensated by reduced caloric intake from other foods. However, evidence from intervention studies for this hypothesis is inconclusive because previous studies were not blinded. Hence results may have been influenced by expectations and behavioral cues rather than by physiological mechanisms.
METHODS: We designed the Double-blind, Randomized INtervention study in Kids (DRINK) to examine the effect on body weight of covertly replacing sugar-sweetened by sugar-free beverages. Children were only eligible if they habitually drank sugar-sweetened beverages. We recruited 642 healthy children (mean age 8.2, range 4.8-11.9). We designed, tested and produced custom-made beverages containing 10% sugar and sugar-free beverages with the same sweet taste and look. Children receive one 250 mL can of study beverage daily for 18 months. We perform body measurements at 0, 6, 12 and 18 months. The primary outcome is the z-score of BMI for age. The maximum predicted difference in this score between groups is 0.72, which corresponds with a difference in body weight of 2.3 kg. DISCUSSION: The double-blind design eliminates behavioral factors that affect body weight. If children gain less body fat when drinking sugar-free than when drinking sugar-sweetened beverages that would show that liquid sugar indeed bypasses biological satiation mechanisms. It would also suggest that a reduction in liquid sugars could decrease body fat more effectively than reduction of other calorie sources.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22056980     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  16 in total

1.  High Sucrose Intake Ameliorates the Accumulation of Hepatic Triacylglycerol Promoted by Restraint Stress in Young Rats.

Authors:  Adriana Corona-Pérez; Mauricio Díaz-Muñoz; Ida Soto Rodríguez; Estela Cuevas; Margarita Martínez-Gómez; Francisco Castelán; Jorge Rodríguez-Antolín; Leticia Nicolás-Toledo
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 1.880

2.  Will reducing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption reduce obesity? Evidence supporting conjecture is strong, but evidence when testing effect is weak.

Authors:  K A Kaiser; J M Shikany; K D Keating; D B Allison
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 9.213

3.  Pediatric Obesity-Assessment, Treatment, and Prevention: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Dennis M Styne; Silva A Arslanian; Ellen L Connor; Ismaa Sadaf Farooqi; M Hassan Murad; Janet H Silverstein; Jack A Yanovski
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Stevia, Nature's Zero-Calorie Sustainable Sweetener: A New Player in the Fight Against Obesity.

Authors:  Margaret Ashwell
Journal:  Nutr Today       Date:  2015-05-14

5.  Students' Consumption of Beverages and Snacks at School and Away from School: A Case Study in the North East of Italy.

Authors:  Carmen Losasso; Veronica Cappa; Marian L Neuhouser; Valerio Giaccone; Igino Andrighetto; Antonia Ricci
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2015-10-07

6.  The potential impact on obesity of a 10% tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Ireland, an effect assessment modelling study.

Authors:  Adam D M Briggs; Oliver T Mytton; David Madden; Donal O'Shea; Mike Rayner; Peter Scarborough
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  The effect of sugar-free versus sugar-sweetened beverages on satiety, liking and wanting: an 18 month randomized double-blind trial in children.

Authors:  Janne C de Ruyter; Martijn B Katan; Lothar D J Kuijper; Djin G Liem; Margreet R Olthof
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Sugar-sweetened beverage intake and cancer recurrence and survival in CALGB 89803 (Alliance).

Authors:  Michael A Fuchs; Kaori Sato; Donna Niedzwiecki; Xing Ye; Leonard B Saltz; Robert J Mayer; Rex B Mowat; Renaud Whittom; Alexander Hantel; Al Benson; Daniel Atienza; Michael Messino; Hedy Kindler; Alan Venook; Shuji Ogino; Kana Wu; Walter C Willett; Edward L Giovannucci; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Do sugar-sweetened beverages cause adverse health outcomes in children? A systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Adrienne Stevens; Candyce Hamel; Kavita Singh; Mohammed T Ansari; Esther Myers; Paula Ziegler; Brian Hutton; Arya Sharma; Lise M Bjerre; Shannon Fenton; Robert Gow; Stasia Hadjiyannakis; Kathryn O'Hara; Catherine Pound; Erinn Salewski; Ian Shrier; Noreen Willows; David Moher; Mark Tremblay
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2014-09-04

Review 10.  Low-energy sweeteners and body weight: a citation network analysis.

Authors:  Mie Normand; Christian Ritz; David Mela; Anne Raben
Journal:  BMJ Nutr Prev Health       Date:  2021-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.