Literature DB >> 22055750

Effect of off-frequency sampling in magnetic resonance elastography.

Curtis L Johnson1, Danchin D Chen, William C Olivero, Bradley P Sutton, John G Georgiadis.   

Abstract

In magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), shear waves at a certain frequency are encoded through bipolar gradients that switch polarity at a controlled encoding frequency and are offset in time to capture wave propagation using a controlled sampling frequency. In brain MRE, there is a possibility that the mechanical actuation frequency is different from the vibration frequency, leading to a mismatch with encoding and sampling frequencies. This mismatch can occur in brain MRE from causes both extrinsic and intrinsic to the brain, such as scanner bed vibrations or active damping in the head. The purpose of this work was to investigate how frequency mismatch can affect MRE shear stiffness measurements. Experiments were performed on a dual-medium agarose gel phantom, and the results were compared with numerical simulations to quantify these effects. It is known that off-frequency encoding alone results in a scaling of wave amplitude, and it is shown here that off-frequency sampling can result in two main effects: (1) errors in the overall shear stiffness estimate of the material on the global scale and (2) local variations appearing as stiffer and softer structures in the material. For small differences in frequency, it was found that measured global stiffness of the brain could theoretically vary by up to 12.5% relative to actual stiffness with local variations of up to 3.7% of the mean stiffness. It was demonstrated that performing MRE experiments at a frequency other than that of tissue vibration can lead to artifacts in the MRE stiffness images, and this mismatch could explain some of the large-scale scatter of stiffness data or lack of repeatability reported in the brain MRE literature.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22055750     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2011.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  4 in total

1.  Correlated noise in brain magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Ariel J Hannum; Grace McIlvain; Damian Sowinski; Matthew D J McGarry; Curtis L Johnson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  3D multislab, multishot acquisition for fast, whole-brain MR elastography with high signal-to-noise efficiency.

Authors:  Curtis L Johnson; Joseph L Holtrop; Matthew D J McGarry; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen; John G Georgiadis; Bradley P Sutton
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Magnetic resonance elastography to estimate brain stiffness: Measurement reproducibility and its estimate in pseudotumor cerebri patients.

Authors:  Arunark Kolipaka; Peter A Wassenaar; Sangmin Cha; Wael M Marashdeh; Xiaokui Mo; Prateek Kalra; Bradley Gans; Brian Raterman; Eric Bourekas
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2018-02-11       Impact factor: 1.605

Review 4.  Stiffness reconstruction methods for MR elastography.

Authors:  Daniel Fovargue; David Nordsletten; Ralph Sinkus
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 4.044

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.