OBJECTIVE: Prognosis is worse in unmarried patients compared with married patients with heart failure (HF). The reasons for differences in outcomes are unclear, but variations in medication adherence may play a role, because medication adherence is essential to achieving better outcomes. The study objective was to determine whether medication adherence mediated the relationship between marital status and cardiac event-free survival in patients with HF. METHODS: Demographic, clinical, and psychosocial data were collected by questionnaires and medical record review for 136 patients with HF (aged 61 ± 11 years, 70% were male, 60% were in New York Heart Association class III/IV). Medication adherence was monitored objectively for 3 months using the Medication Event Monitoring System. Cardiac event-free survival data were obtained by patient/family interview, hospital database, and death certificate review. A series of regression and Cox survival analyses were performed to determine whether medication adherence mediated the relationship between marital status and event-free survival. RESULTS: Cardiac event-free survival was worse in unmarried patients than in married patients. Unmarried patients were more likely to be nonadherent and 2 times more likely to experience an event than married patients (P = .017). Marital status was not a significant predictor of event-free survival after entering medication adherence in the model, demonstrating a mediation effect of adherence on the relationship of marital status to survival. CONCLUSION: Medication adherence mediated the relationship between marital status and event-free survival. It is important to design interventions to increase medication adherence that take into account subgroups, such as unmarried patients, who are at higher risk for nonadherence. Copyright Â
OBJECTIVE: Prognosis is worse in unmarried patients compared with married patients with heart failure (HF). The reasons for differences in outcomes are unclear, but variations in medication adherence may play a role, because medication adherence is essential to achieving better outcomes. The study objective was to determine whether medication adherence mediated the relationship between marital status and cardiac event-free survival in patients with HF. METHODS: Demographic, clinical, and psychosocial data were collected by questionnaires and medical record review for 136 patients with HF (aged 61 ± 11 years, 70% were male, 60% were in New York Heart Association class III/IV). Medication adherence was monitored objectively for 3 months using the Medication Event Monitoring System. Cardiac event-free survival data were obtained by patient/family interview, hospital database, and death certificate review. A series of regression and Cox survival analyses were performed to determine whether medication adherence mediated the relationship between marital status and event-free survival. RESULTS: Cardiac event-free survival was worse in unmarried patients than in married patients. Unmarried patients were more likely to be nonadherent and 2 times more likely to experience an event than married patients (P = .017). Marital status was not a significant predictor of event-free survival after entering medication adherence in the model, demonstrating a mediation effect of adherence on the relationship of marital status to survival. CONCLUSION: Medication adherence mediated the relationship between marital status and event-free survival. It is important to design interventions to increase medication adherence that take into account subgroups, such as unmarried patients, who are at higher risk for nonadherence. Copyright Â
Authors: Wilfried Mullens; Zuheir Abrahams; George Sokos; Gary S Francis; Randall C Starling; James B Young; David O Taylor; W H Wilson Tang Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2008-05-22 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Deborah B Diercks; Gregg C Fonarow; J Douglas Kirk; Charles L Emerman; Judd E Hollander; Jim Edward Weber; Richard L Summers; Janet Wynne; W Franklin Peacock Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Michael A Freeman; John R Pleis; Kellee R Bornemann; Emilee Croswell; Mary Amanda Dew; Chung-Chou H Chang; Galen E Switzer; Anthony Langone; Anuja Mittal-Henkle; Somnath Saha; Mohan Ramkumar; Jareen Adams Flohr; Christie P Thomas; Larissa Myaskovsky Journal: Transplantation Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Olivia R Ghosh-Swaby; Mary Tan; Akshay Bagai; Andrew T Yan; Shaun G Goodman; Shamir R Mehta; Harold N Fisher; Eric A Cohen; Thao Huynh; Warren J Cantor; Michel R Le May; Jean-Pierre Déry; Robert C Welsh; Jacob A Udell Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2018-03-25 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Lisa M Hooper; Lauren E Huffman; John C Higginbotham; George C T Mugoya; Annie K Smith; Tia N Dumas Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2017-04-05