OBJECTIVE: The relaxation response (RR) is a physiological state that is the counterpart to the stress response. We investigate the psychological and biological effects, as well as the correlation between these two effects that are associated with short-term vs. long-term practice of techniques that elicit the RR ("RR practice"). METHODS: The study comprised both a cross sectional and an 8-week prospective design. The study sample included individuals with a long-term RR practice ("long-term practitioners" n = 28) and those with no prior RR practice experience ("novices" n = 28). The novices received 8 weeks of RR-elicitation training ("RR training") for the prospective analysis (short-term practice). RESULTS: Long-term practitioners reported lower levels of psychological distress than the novices before they received RR training. As a result of the 8-week RR training, novices significantly reduced their psychological distress to levels comparable to that of long-term practitioners. Long-term practitioners had greater immediate (after listening to a RR-eliciting CD) decreases in psychological distress level than the 8-week trained novices. Furthermore, the reduction in psychological distress levels for long-term practitioners correlated with a reduction in biological measures of stress, after controlling for baseline values. There was no reduction in biological measures and no correlation with psychological measures in the 8-week trained novices. CONCLUSIONS: While our data indicate that even a short-term 8-week RR-eliciting practice can decrease psychological distress levels, only after years of RR practice does psychological distress reduction coincide with biological change. Published by Elsevier Inc.
OBJECTIVE: The relaxation response (RR) is a physiological state that is the counterpart to the stress response. We investigate the psychological and biological effects, as well as the correlation between these two effects that are associated with short-term vs. long-term practice of techniques that elicit the RR ("RR practice"). METHODS: The study comprised both a cross sectional and an 8-week prospective design. The study sample included individuals with a long-term RR practice ("long-term practitioners" n = 28) and those with no prior RR practice experience ("novices" n = 28). The novices received 8 weeks of RR-elicitation training ("RR training") for the prospective analysis (short-term practice). RESULTS: Long-term practitioners reported lower levels of psychological distress than the novices before they received RR training. As a result of the 8-week RR training, novices significantly reduced their psychological distress to levels comparable to that of long-term practitioners. Long-term practitioners had greater immediate (after listening to a RR-eliciting CD) decreases in psychological distress level than the 8-week trained novices. Furthermore, the reduction in psychological distress levels for long-term practitioners correlated with a reduction in biological measures of stress, after controlling for baseline values. There was no reduction in biological measures and no correlation with psychological measures in the 8-week trained novices. CONCLUSIONS: While our data indicate that even a short-term 8-week RR-eliciting practice can decrease psychological distress levels, only after years of RR practice does psychological distress reduction coincide with biological change. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Anne-Marie Duchemin; Beth A Steinberg; Donald R Marks; Kristin Vanover; Maryanna Klatt Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Ana Howarth; Muhammad Riaz; Linda Perkins-Porras; Jared G Smith; Jeevakan Subramaniam; Claire Copland; Mike Hurley; Iain Beith; Michael Ussher Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2019-04-22
Authors: Annika B E Benz; Raphaela J Gaertner; Maria Meier; Eva Unternaehrer; Simona Scharndke; Clara Jupe; Maya Wenzel; Ulrike U Bentele; Stephanie J Dimitroff; Bernadette F Denk; Jens C Pruessner Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2022-06-10
Authors: David S Black; Steve W Cole; Michael R Irwin; Elizabeth Breen; Natalie M St Cyr; Nora Nazarian; Dharma S Khalsa; Helen Lavretsky Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2012-07-15 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Manoj K Bhasin; Jeffery A Dusek; Bei-Hung Chang; Marie G Joseph; John W Denninger; Gregory L Fricchione; Herbert Benson; Towia A Libermann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rinske A Gotink; Paula Chu; Jan J V Busschbach; Herbert Benson; Gregory L Fricchione; M G Myriam Hunink Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 3.240