Literature DB >> 22054333

Urgent suspected cancer referrals from general practice: audit of compliance with guidelines and referral outcomes.

Paul Baughan1, Jennifer Keatings, Bill O'Neill.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Late diagnosis contributes to the UK having poorer cancer survival than many countries in Europe. Cancer referral guidelines help GPs decide which patients to refer urgently for further investigation. AIM: To examine primary care referral patterns, compliance with referral guidance, and eventual outcome for patients. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Prospective audit within general practice in Scotland.
METHOD: GPs in Scotland reviewed all urgent suspected cancer referrals over a 6-month period. They noted the final diagnosis and assessed whether the referral was in accordance with agreed referral guidelines.
RESULTS: A total of 18 775 urgent suspected cancer referrals were analysed from 516 GP practices. The referral rate ranged from 3.7 to 24.0 per 1000 per annum; 30.8% of referrals were for patients aged under 50 years, yet this age group accounts for only 11.1% of all diagnosed cancers; 10.3% of all urgent cancer referrals were for suspected melanoma, despite this cancer accounting for only 4.1% of new cancers. The proportion of patients subsequently diagnosed with cancer was greatest for leukaemia (61.7%), prostate (52.6%), and lung cancer referrals (39.7%), and lowest for melanoma (11.8%), oesophago-gastric (11.2%), brain (10.6%), and laryngeal cancer referrals (7.8%). Compliance with referral guidelines was 90.9%. A large proportion of referrals considered to be outside the guidelines still had a cancer diagnosed (urological 15.9%, lung 8.8%, colorectal 8.4%, and breast 6.4%).
CONCLUSION: There is wide variation in GP referral rates for suspected cancer with a greater than expected proportion of referrals for younger people. Many referrals considered to be outside the national guidelines were diagnosed with cancer, suggesting factors other than those in referral guidelines alert GPs to the possibility of cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22054333      PMCID: PMC3207087          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X606591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  12 in total

1.  Urgent GP referrals for suspected lung, colorectal, prostate and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Victoria L Allgar; Richard D Neal; Nasreen Ali; Brenda Leese; Phil Heywood; Gill Proctor; Joyce Evans
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Positive predictive values of ≥5% in primary care for cancer: systematic review.

Authors:  Mark Shapley; Gemma Mansell; Joanne L Jordan; Kelvin P Jordan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Diagnosis of lung cancer in primary care: a structured review.

Authors:  William Hamilton; Deborah Sharp
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 2.267

4.  Stage, survival and delays in lung, colorectal, prostate and ovarian cancer: comparison between diagnostic routes.

Authors:  Richard D Neal; Victoria L Allgar; Nasreen Ali; Brenda Leese; Phil Heywood; Gill Proctor; Joyce Evans
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Survival for eight major cancers and all cancers combined for European adults diagnosed in 1995-99: results of the EUROCARE-4 study.

Authors:  Franco Berrino; Roberta De Angelis; Milena Sant; Stefano Rosso; Magdalena Bielska-Lasota; Magdalena B Lasota; Jan W Coebergh; Mariano Santaquilani
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Inter general practice variability in use of referral guidelines for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S K P John; O M Jones; N Horseman; P Thomas; R D Howell; J B J Fozard
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Diagnosis of colorectal cancer in primary care: the evidence base for guidelines.

Authors:  William Hamilton; Deborah Sharp
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.267

8.  Non-standard management of breast cancer increases with age in the UK: a population based cohort of women > or =65 years.

Authors:  K Lavelle; C Todd; A Moran; A Howell; N Bundred; M Campbell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  The CAPER studies: five case-control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying the risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patients.

Authors:  W Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative in England: assembling the evidence.

Authors:  M A Richards
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  25 in total

1.  Cancer and primary care: the clinical and research agenda.

Authors:  William Hamilton; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Urgent suspected cancer referrals from general practice.

Authors:  Chris Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  International variation in adherence to referral guidelines for suspected cancer: a secondary analysis of survey data.

Authors:  Brian D Nicholson; David Mant; Richard D Neal; Nigel Hart; Willie Hamilton; Bethany Shinkins; Greg Rubin; Peter W Rose
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Investigating cancer symptoms in older people: what are the issues and where is the evidence?

Authors:  Daniel Jones; Erica di Martino; Nathaniel L Hatton; Claire Surr; Niek de Wit; Richard D Neal
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Just stick to the facts: remember Goodhart's law.

Authors:  A Gordon Baird
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Systematic review of clinical features of suspected prostate cancer in primary care.

Authors:  Sheila-Mae Young; Praveen Bansal; Emily T Vella; Antonio Finelli; Cheryl Levitt; Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Variation in use of the 2-week referral pathway for suspected cancer: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  David Meechan; Carolynn Gildea; Louise Hollingworth; Mike A Richards; Di Riley; Greg Rubin
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Interventions to reduce the time to diagnosis of brain tumours.

Authors:  Robin Grant; Therese Dowswell; Eve Tomlinson; Paul M Brennan; Fiona M Walter; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; David William Hunt; Helen Bulbeck; Ashleigh Kernohan; Tomos Robinson; Theresa A Lawrie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-09-04

9.  The Danish cancer pathway for patients with serious non-specific symptoms and signs of cancer-a cross-sectional study of patient characteristics and cancer probability.

Authors:  Mads Lind Ingeman; Morten Bondo Christensen; Flemming Bro; Søren T Knudsen; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Age and Gender Variations in Cancer Diagnostic Intervals in 15 Cancers: Analysis of Data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

Authors:  Nafees U Din; Obioha C Ukoumunne; Greg Rubin; William Hamilton; Ben Carter; Sal Stapley; Richard D Neal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.